The Scientific Dictatorship

In his 1951 essay, The Impact of Science on Society, Bertrand Russell wrote that the most important science of the future would be ”mass psychology … taken up by scientists under a scientific dictatorship.” He said that ”the influence of [the] home is obstructive” and that ”indoctrination” must begin ”before the age of ten.” He warned, ”Although this science of mass psychology will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions are generated. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen…”

Pillage and Genocide

1. The global economic crisis started in 2008 caused by the actions of the Wall Street thugs. (With Lehman brothers bank collapse)

2. Greece had no problem borrowing in 2009.

3. The previous prime minister met with Papandreou before the elections and asked him to cooperate to some austerity measures. He did not agree.

4. Papandreou wins the elections with the slogan: “There is money”

5. After (or even before) the elections Papandreou was secretly meeting with IMF chief Strauss-Kahn so he can get Greece under IMF. Strauss-Kahn admitted he was being pressured but he was unsure if EU will accept IMF to be a player in Eurozone.

6. Critical months went by without announcing any kind of austerity measures. How can this be, when Papandreou is already making secret meetings with the IMF?

7. At the same time, Papandreou and his officials were slandering Greeks in EU by crying “Greeks are corrupt” and creating unnecessary panic about the state of the Greek economy.

8. Late 2009 – early 2010. Greece can still borrow money with low interest, but the Greek government “experts” avoid doing that. Why should they?

9. Wall Street financial services companies and international Banks including German Banks picked up and amplified the panic creating a situation with the Greek bond CDSs.

10. The (privately owned) Bank of Greece had recently increased the time for speculation for the CDSs so that the speculators can go wild. Greek bond CDSs (spreads) reached incredible highs.

11. Papandreou pressures EU to receive financial help by “threatening” to go for an IMF solution outside EU.

12. This phony dilemma was staged because he had promised Strauss-Kahn to get IMF into EU. This solution was convenient for Germany because that way the IMF could enforce stricter austerity measures without having the EU looking bad.

13. After many phony negotiations meant to fool the public, a joint EU-IMF solution is announced.

14. IMF austerity measures literally kill the Greek economy and result in very low revenues.

15. Bailouts are arranged in payments only after blackmailing ensures more and more insane measures.

16. 2011: Unemployment increases, businesses close down, nobody spends money, revenues drop even more and everything is worse than in 2010.

17. All bailout money goes directly towards loans of private banks and/or interest due.

18. Greece is forced to transfer almost full ownership to EU and IMF to sell all public assets, resources and everything they can get their hands on. Additional austerity is demanded from the Greek people. They react to total enslavement and protest.

19. Debt increases exponentially because their measures have stopped most economic activity just like in Argentina and most countries IMF was installed. They have publicly admitted that their measures have failed. So why do they continue on the same path?

20. June 29 2011. The abomination known as “middle term agreement” is voted, while international bankers, European leaders (and many European citizens) want more and more blood. Greeks hope they can somehow please their bloodthirsty instincts.

“There is money”
G.Papandreou (before the Oct 2009 elections)

“The budget problem threatens our national sovereignty, for the first time since 1974.”
G.Papandreou (Dec 10, 2009)

“We need global governance, global financial governance, and we need it fast”. G.Papandreou (April 29, 2010)

Euro zone integration must progress and states requiring aid must be prepared to give up some of their sovereignty to the European Union, Germany’s finance minister was cited as saying in Stern magazine.
“Integration must progress and a state with problems that receives aid must in return give up some of its sovereignty to the EU,” Schaeuble said. (Wed Jul 27, 2011, Reuters)

There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by debt.
John Adams 1735-1826

John Perkins, author of “Confessions of An Economic Hit Man”:

We economic hit men really have been the ones responsible for creating this first truly global empire, and we work many different ways…but perhaps the most common is that we will identify a country that has resources that our corporations covet, like oil, and then arrange a huge loan to that country from the World Bank or one of its sister organizations. But the money never actually goes to the country…instead it goes to our big corporations to build infrastructure projects in that country-power plants, industrial parks, ports-things that benefit a few rich people in that country, in addition to our corporations-but really don`t help the majority of the people at all…however those people, the whole country, is left holding a huge debt. Its such a big debt that they can`t repay it, and that`s part of the plan, that they can`t repay it. And so at some point we economic hit men go back to them and say listen, you owe us a lot of money, can`t pay your debts, so, sell your oil real cheap to our oil companies…allow us to build a military base in your country…or, send troops in support of ours to someplace in the world, like Iraq…or vote with us on the next U.N. vote…to have their electric utility company privatized, and their water and sewage system privatized, and sold to US corporations or other multinational corporations. So there was a whole mushrooming thing, and it`s so typical of the way that the IMF and the World Bank work: they put a country in debt, in such a big debt it can`t pay it, and then you offer to refinance that debt, and pay even more interest, and you demand this quid pro quo which you call a “conditionality” or “good governance” which means basically that they`ve got to sell off their resources, including many of their social services; their utility companies; their school systems sometimes; their penal systems; their insurance systems, to foreign corporations. So its a double, triple, quadruple whammy.

Reshaping the International Order

What Does a World Governed by Humanistic Socialism Look Like?
Reshaping the International Order Part 1

Brent Jessop – Knowledge Driven Revolution.com
April 7, 2008

“The establishment of a New International Economic Order entails fundamental changes in political, social, cultural and other aspects of society, changes which would bring about a New International Order.” – RIO: Reshaping the International Order, 1976 (p5)

The Club of Rome is a premiere think tank composed of approximately 100 members including leading scientists, philosophers, political advisors, former politicians and many other influential bureaucrats and technocrats. This series of articles describes the major conclusions of the 1976 book Rio: Reshaping the International Order: A Report to the Club of Rome [1] coordinated by Nobel Laureate Jan Tinbergen. The RIO report “addresses the following question: what new international order should be recommended to the world’s statesmen and social groups so as to meet, to the extent practically and realistically possible, the urgent needs of today’s population and the probable needs of future generations?”

From RIO: Reshaping the International Order:

[Italicised text is original emphasis and bolded text is added by author.]

“Many in the RIO group believe that this equitable social order could best be described as humanistic socialism…” – 63

So what exactly does a new social order based on “humanistic socialism” look like? Below is the RIO group’s own description of what the future should look like.

Collective Workers and Full Employment

“Society must also deliberately aim at creating employment for all those seeking it and at ensuring that the distribution over different types of jobs achieves a balance between the satisfaction derived from the job and the satisfaction of the needs of society. The latter necessitates that certain unpleasant (heavy, dirty, dangerous) activities be performed. If these activities can be learnt relatively easily, they could be performed by all citizens. Their efforts could be organized in the form of ‘land’ or ‘neighbourhood armies’ for work in rural areas, in the field of environmental care…” – 69

“A full employment policy should be adopted by all governments as part of their development plan.” – 145

“As a counterpart to these rights, a number of duties must be accepted, especially the duty to use one’s capacities in the interest of an adequate level of production…” – 63

“Public power should be used to ensure that education is geared to meet the needs of individuals and the needs of society, that is, all individuals. The supply of qualified types of labour should be so planned as to equal, to the greatest extent possible, the demand for them by society (i.e. by the ‘organizers of production’).” – 69

A Planned World Economy

“Effective application of public power implies the need for middle and long-range planning at different levels… The UN Economic and Social Council might be best suited for undertaking such a task, perhaps assisted by the UN Development Planning Committee.” – 70

“At the highest level, the level of world affairs, international institutions must form the prime movers of planned change.” – 100

“… the optimum utilization of human and physical resources in the world as a whole.” – 140

“One of the basic questions which today faces the international community is whether it should accelerate the process of this evolution and consciously put in place the various elements of a system for global planning and the management of resources…

The achievement of this global planning and management system calls for the conscious transfer of power – a gradual transfer to be sure – from the nation State to the world organization. Only when this transfer takes place can the organization become effective and purposeful.” – 184

Private Sector and Global Free Trade

“New forms of cooperation between private initiative and public authorities will have to be characterized by a certain balance of power…” – 280

“In the trade field, an International Trade and Development Organization, formed by expanding the responsibilities of UNCTAD [United Nations Conference on Trade and Development], should be set up with a very broad mandate for overall coordination of policy issues relating to international trade in primary commodities and manufactured goods. Likewise, UNIDO’s [United Nations Industrial Development Organization] responsibilities should be increased to enable it to participate in the planning of a more equitable world industrial order;…” – 184

“This [Third World development] implies that, if a new international order is to be created, the rich nations must be prepared to give up part of their future productive capacity. To be able to do this smoothly they will need to resort to adjustment policies and such policies must form part of their development strategies… The creation of an optimal international division of labour, and as such the selective development of economic activities in Third World countries, calls for the substantial extension of such adjustment policies…

It is no longer desirable that the industrialized countries adopt policies of protecting their labour-intensive industries in the manufacturing sector. Rather, they should seek, as must the Third World, to develop those industries in which they have a comparative advantage…

The process described, albeit with distortions, is already taking place: some sectors of Western manufacturing industry are moving to Third World countries. The movement of Western European garment industries to North Africa is a case in point. As such, private initiative will no doubt prove responsible for a large part of the adjustment required. That adjustments are at present insufficient is witnessed by the millions of workers who migrate from the Third World to seek employment in the Western industrialized nations. To the extent that the adjustments brought about by private initiative on the strength of international market forces will be inadequate, and in view of the fact that private enterprises may not be sufficiently creative nor responsive to the needs of countries, adjustment must be stimulated and guided by selective taxes and subsidies. Subsidies should be offered to those industries with a clear potential for contributing to a country’s or a regions’ development efforts. Such subsidies could aim at supporting changes, where necessary, in the production mix of enterprises…

To ensure the effectiveness of adjustment policies, there is a clear need for coordination of policies both between the industrialized countries and between public authorities and the private sector…” – 112

“The industrialized countries, on their part, will have to introduce policies of adjustment, develop specialization in knowledge-intensive products and gradually introduce and enforce environmental protection standards.” – 143

“In the long term, transnational enterprises will still form part of the world structure, in either their present form of private enterprises or in a renovated form comprising genuine international ventures.” – 160

Public International Enterprises

“The possibility of genuine internationalization of some transnational enterprises or transnational operations should be further investigated. They could be owned, controlled and managed by an international development authority. The pharmaceutical industry could be used as an initial test case for analysis because of its international social implications.” – 281

“Active sharing of benefits [of the ocean], with particular regard to the needs of the less developed countries, through a variety of devices including international public enterprises, especially for fishing and offshore oil production; international tax on ocean uses, etc.” – 175

Consumption Patterns

“The rich nations… must develop new consumption styles which are less wasteful, less resource – intensive and geared to the consumption of social services rather than of superfluous consumer durables.” – 183

“Growth in equality would make it less difficult for people to accept the principle of self-restraint in the satisfaction of material needs, the ideological cornerstone of the future ‘steady state’. It would equally create the necessary social conditions for self-control of family size and the consequent reduction in population pressure; birth-control campaigns are likely to remain largely ineffective (unless enforced by coercion, which is clearly unacceptable) up to the time that peasants are freed from material insecurity, that infant mortality rates go down, and that the use of unpaid child labour is no longer necessary to make ends meet.” – 162

“Ultimately, they must aim to construct their policies on a series of ‘maxima’ which define an appropriate style of civilized living in a world of deprivation and declare that all consumption beyond that fixed maxima is not only waste but a conscious action against the welfare of large numbers of poor and disprivileged, their own children, and the prospects for a peaceful world.” – 76

Financial and Monetary Change

“(a) The gradual introduction of a system of international taxation which should be handled by a World Treasury, both to meet the current as well as the development needs of the poorer nations;

(b) The creation of an international reserve currency by an international authority, such as an International Central Bank, which should be under international management without being dominated by the interests of one particular group of nations;” -184

“The statutes of transnational enterprises should be under the supervision of, and their profits taxed by, an inter- or supranational authority.” – 160

More on the proposed changes to the financial system in part 2 of this series entitled: Reshaping the International Financial Order.

International Control of All Mineral Resources – The Common Heritage of Mankind Concept

“In the long term, and assuming progress towards the creation of an equitable international economic and social order leading to a pooling of material and non-material resources, mineral resources will need to be viewed as a common heritage of mankind. This concept implies both a real world market for all mineral resources and a system of world taxation to replace national mining taxation. The revenues collected should be redistributed among Third World countries – possibly through such an agency as IDA [International Development Association - World Bank group]…

This tax could, for instance, be introduced as one of a moderate rate and gradually be raised to something in the order of 70 per cent of profits on fossil fuels and 50 per cent of the value of production of ores (including uranium).

Such a tax would, like the present taxes on oil products, in fact be paid by the consumers…

Such a tax, at the rates proposed, would probably induce consumers to restrict their consumption of mineral raw materials…” – 148

“It is now recognized that a more elaborate system of careful husbandry and management of raw materials and scarce resources is inevitable.” – 244

The redefinition of sovereignty from “territorial sovereignty” to “functional sovereignty” as well as the establishment and expansion of the concept of the “common heritage of mankind” is discussed in more detail in part 3 of this series entitled: “Functional” Sovereignty and the Common Heritage of Mankind.

Reshaping Public Opinion

“Public opinion is no phenomenon sui generic. It is in part the result of government policies and by definition politicians cannot hide behind their own creation. If some sectors of public opinion in the industrialized countries are immersed in the rhetoric and slogans associated with misunderstanding, then much of this may be inherited from their political leaders. And if these leaders are in part responsible for a situation which impedes acceptance of the need for change, then they themselves must be held responsible for changing this situation.” – 110

The reshaping of public opinion and the importance of the scientist and experts is further described in part 4 of this series entitled: Reshaping Public Opinion and the White Coated Propagandists.

World Food Authority

“A number of measures have been proposed which should bring greater planning and coordination in the field of domestic food production and international supplies of food, including the establishment of world grain reserves… In the last analysis, it may require the setting up of a World Food Authority to supervise this vital area of human activity and survival” – 184

More on the establishment and functioning of the World Food Authority in part 5 of this series entitled: Population Control and the World Food Authority.

A Glimpse into the New Order

The final article in this series will examine a wide range of topics including: regional unions, world solidarity, foundations of the international legal system, freedom and the establishment of an standing United Nations military.

[1] Quotes from Jan Tinbergen, RIO: Reshaping the International Order: A Report to the Club of Rome (1976). ISBN 0-525-04340-3

---

 

Reshaping the International Financial Order
Reshaping the International Order Part 2

Brent Jessop – Knowledge Driven Revolution.com
April 14, 2008

“Among the instruments of implementation at the international level, I attach the highest priority to the introduction of international taxation and the establishment of an international central bank.” – Mahbub ul Haq, Director of Policy Planning World Bank (1970-1982) and RIO Member (p321)

The Club of Rome is a premiere think tank composed of approximately 100 members including leading scientists, philosophers, political advisors, former politicians and many other influential bureaucrats and technocrats. This series of articles describes the major conclusions of the 1976 book Rio: Reshaping the International Order: A Report to the Club of Rome [1] coordinated by Nobel Laureate Jan Tinbergen. The RIO report “addresses the following question: what new international order should be recommended to the world’s statesmen and social groups so as to meet, to the extent practically and realistically possible, the urgent needs of today’s population and the probable needs of future generations?”

Part 1 of this series gives an overview of the proposed new international order described by the RIO report as “humanistic socialism”. This includes: collective neighbourhood armies, a fully planned world economy, global free trade, public international enterprises, proposed changes in consumption patterns among other topics.

Below is a summary of some of the changes to the financial system proposed by The Club of Rome.

Creation of a World Reserve Currency

From RIO: Reshaping the International Order:

[Italicised text is original emphasis and bolded text is added by author.]

“Phasing out of national reserve currencies as well as gold from reserve creation, confining increasingly the latter to SDR [Special Drawing Rights] type assets created by joint decisions…” – 128

“The residual use of gold as a reserve stock for central banks should and will be phased out gradually.” – 199

“The creation of an international reserve currency by an international authority, such as an International Central Bank, which should be under international management without being dominated by the interests of one particular group of nations;” – 184

“Fundamental reforms in the international monetary system so that international liquidity is not created in such an unplanned fashion that it generates alternate cycles of inflation, stagflation and depression. If national reserve currencies are replaced by an international reserve currency, to be created and managed by the international community in line with the genuine needs for the growth of the international economic system and with special regard to the pressing needs of the Third World, it can considerably help in avoiding some of the present unplanned fluctuations in economic activity.” – 183

Some tricks never seem to get old. Prevention of “alternate cycles of inflation, stagflation and depression” is exactly the same hogwash used to sell the Federal Reserve Act to the Americans in 1913. How well did that work?

Creation of a World Treasury and Global Taxation

“It also follows that some groups must today devote their efforts to the preparation of long range proposals in order to ensure that they will be operative on time. This applies especially to investigations into the feasibility of the more ambitious long range proposals, such as the creation of a World Treasury.” – 125

“The gradual introduction of a system of international taxation which should be handled by a World Treasury, both to meet the current as well as the development needs of the poorer nations;” – 184

“The statutes of transnational enterprises should be under the supervision of, and their profits taxed by, an inter- or supranational authority.” – 160

“international commons… ocean-tolls and air-tolls should be considered…” – 165

“these observations would suggest that, in the long run, a World Treasury could form an effective instrument for attaining some of the aims of an international community. In that it would operate from a current budget of expenditures, it would require a current budget of income. This would be derived from two obvious sources: revenue from international taxes and from the world community’s ownership of productive resources. Taxes and incomes, profits, the use of scarce resources and the royalties received from concessions could figure among the most important types of revenue.” – 131

“Ultimately, there is a need for the equivalent of a World Treasury, the resources of which are derived from international taxation and ownership of international productive resources (such as the resources of the oceans).” – 133

Some Techniques of Implementation

One implementation technique requires the use of “pioneering” countries to voluntarily submit to international taxation and their new monetary order.

“A desirable form of international decision-making, however, is one in which a genuinely supranational authority takes decisions on a qualified majority principle. A qualified majority may comprise a system of weighted votes, be based on a simple majority, or based on a system in which not only the total number of representatives but also the representatives of some well defined groups must together form a majority… (b) A decision-making body can be initiated by several pioneering countries on a voluntary basis and then be gradually extended. Some of the means used could first be applied at low levels, for example, a tax on consumer durables, and be gradually raised and extended to include more categories and eventually more countries. (c) Membership of an international decision-making body should be open to both public authorities and private organizations, whether non-profit or profit-making, or a combination of these categories.” – 104

Another technique of implementation requires the use of organizations like OPEC to collect international taxes on behalf of the world community.

“The Financing of Development: A new framework for international resource transfers form an essential part of the effort to establish a new international order. It will take time to negotiate such a framework and put its various elements in place, but at least some of the principles on which this framework should be based can be spelt out. (I) An element of automation must be built into the resource transfer system. To be realistic, the world community is still too early in its stage of evolution and recognition of its interdependence to accept the concept of international taxation of the rich nations for the benefit of the poor nations. But the concept need not be accepted in its entirety: it can be introduced gradually over time through a variety of devices:… (b) certain sources of international financing can be developed – such as tax on non-renewable resources, tax on international pollutants… (c) if the rich industrialized nations are unwilling to tax themselves, others can collect and distribute these tax proceeds on the basis of what the rich nations consume – e.g. even a one-dollar per barrel ‘development levy’ by OPEC…” – 216

One World Currency

“The Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States… already lays down the fundamental principles which should govern international economic relations. The transformation, over time, of the Charter into the proposed framework treaty would greatly facilitate the establishment of a new international order. If this is to be done, some more specific provisions, omitted from the Charter, should be considered for inclusion in the framework treaty. Such provisions could include:…

(g) All States shall accept an international currency to be created by an international authority;” – 117

The Club of Rome is currently working on a project entitled Monetary Simplification Euro/Dollar: Towards a Global Currency headed by Ramon Tamames.

Conclusion

The next part in this series addresses the redefinition of sovereignty from “territorial sovereignty” to “functional sovereignty” as well as the use of the concept of the “common heritage of mankind” to gain international control of not just the oceans, atmosphere and outer space but also all material and non-material resources. Part 4 discusses the generation of public opinion and the use of white coated propagandists. The creation of a World Food Authority and its use for population control is examined in part 5. The final article in this series deals with a variety of issues including global solidarity, regional unions, legal changes and a standing United Nations Peace Force.

[1] Quotes from Jan Tinbergen, RIO: Reshaping the International Order: A Report to the Club of Rome (1976). ISBN 0-525-04340-3

---

 

“Functional” Sovereignty and the Common Heritage of Mankind
Reshaping the International Order Part 3

Brent Jessop – Knowledge Driven Revolution.com
April 21, 2008

“The achievement of this global planning and management system calls for the conscious transfer of power – a gradual transfer to be sure – from the nation State to the world organization. Only when this transfer takes place can the organization become effective and purposeful.” – RIO: Reshaping the International Order, 1976 (p185)

This article addresses the redefinition of sovereignty from “territorial sovereignty” to “functional sovereignty” by The Club of Rome. Also discussed is the use of the concept of the “common heritage of mankind” to gain international control of not just the oceans, atmosphere and outer space but also all material and non-material resources.

The Club of Rome is a premiere think tank composed of approximately 100 members including leading scientists, philosophers, political advisors, former politicians and many other influential bureaucrats and technocrats. This series of articles describes the major conclusions of the 1976 book Rio: Reshaping the International Order: A Report to the Club of Rome [1] coordinated by Nobel Laureate Jan Tinbergen. The RIO report “addresses the following question: what new international order should be recommended to the world’s statesmen and social groups so as to meet, to the extent practically and realistically possible, the urgent needs of today’s population and the probable needs of future generations?”

Part 1 of this series gives an overview of the proposed new international order described by the RIO report as “humanistic socialism”. This includes: collective neighbourhood armies, a fully planned world economy, global free trade, public international enterprises, proposed changes in consumption patterns among other topics. Changes to the financial system including international taxation and the creation of a World Treasury, World Central Bank and World Currency are examined in part 2.

Territorial Sovereignty versus Functional Sovereignty

From RIO: Reshaping the International Order:

[Italicised text is original emphasis and bolded text is added by author.]

“Given the growing list of problems confronting mankind, every effort must be made to stimulate processes which point in directions which can be deemed desirable. This would certainly apply, for example, to the tendency towards the increasing centralization of decision-making involving issues beyond national frontiers should be viewed as a logical continuation of the process of change and a precondition for the effective assertion of national sovereignty.” – 103

The “increasing centralization of [international] decision-making” being a “precondition for the effective assertion of national sovereignty” may seem contradictory. The reason for this misunderstanding is your definition of sovereignty is based on an apparently outdated “territorial sovereignty” instead of the much more modern and politically correct “functional sovereignty”.

“In other words, the traditional concept of territorial sovereignty should be replaced by the concept of functional sovereignty, which distinguishes jurisdiction over specific uses from sovereignty over geographic space. This would permit the interweaving of national jurisdiction and international competences within the same territorial space and open the possibility of applying the concept of the common heritage of mankind both beyond and within the limits of national jurisdiction.”- 172

That is right, “sovereignty” no longer involves governmental control within a geographic space, rather it refers to governmental control of specific functions within a geographic space. Which functions would depend on the dictates of a world authority.

“Acceptance of these elements calls for a reinterpretation of the concept of national sovereignty. Participation and social control suggest a functional rather than a territorial interpretation of sovereignty, or jurisdiction over determined uses rather than geographical space. Conceptually, this interpretation will make possible the progressive internationalization and socialization of all world resources – material and non-material – based upon the ‘common heritage of mankind’ principle. It also permits the secure accommodation of inclusive and exclusive uses of these resources, or, in other words, the interweaving of national and international jurisdiction within the same territorial space… Ultimately, we must air for decentralized sovereignty with the network of strong international institutions which will make it possible.” – 82

Common Heritage of Mankind as “Functional Ownership”

“… the new concepts of functional sovereignty and functional ownership (common heritage of mankind).” – 314

“The [Communist Yugoslavian] concept of social ownership and its attributes are clearly applicable to the ‘common heritage’ concept.” – 81

“Effective planning and management calls for the fundamental restructuring of the United Nations so as to give it broad economic powers and a more decisive mandate for international economic decision-making… It is also hoped that major changes in the United Nations structure will be made over the next decade so that it is not only able to play a more forceful role in world political affairs but it is also able to become more of a World Development Authority in managing the socio-economic affairs of the international community. … The most effective way of articulating the planning and management functions of this organization would be through a functional confederation of international organizations, based upon existing, restructured and, in some instances, new United Nations agencies – to be linked through an integrative machinery. This system and its machinery, if it is really to reflect interdependencies between nations and solidarity between peoples, should ultimately aim at the pooling and sharing of all resources, material and non-material, including means of production, with a view to ensuring effective planning and management of the world economy and of global resource use in a way which would meet the essential objectives of equity and efficiency.” – 185

“In the long term, and assuming progress towards the creation of an equitable international economic and social order leading to a pooling of material and non-material resources, mineral resources will need to be viewed as a common heritage of mankind. This concept implies both a real world market for all mineral resources and a system of world taxation to replace national mining taxation. The revenues collected should be redistributed among Third World countries – possibly through such an agency as IDA [International Development Association - World Bank group]…

This tax could, for instance, be introduced as one of a moderate rate and gradually be raised to something in the order of 70 per cent of profits on fossil fuels and 50 per cent of the value of production of ores (including uranium).

Such a tax would, like the present taxes on oil products, in fact be paid by the consumers…

Such a tax, at the rates proposed, would probably induce consumers to restrict their consumption of mineral raw materials…” – 148

This concept includes the manipulation of the Third World “national liberation” movements in the post colonial era. These are only stepping stones toward “functional sovereignty”.

“[Third World territorial sovereignty] is a weapon which must be used in the struggle for a new international order.” – 247

“After the exercise of national sovereignty by Third World countries over their national resources has helped to establish more equality between mineral producing and consuming countries, a switch to the concept of the ‘common heritage of mankind’ is recommended and a gradual transformation of the principle of territorial sovereignty into functional sovereignty. This must be viewed as the most desirable approach to the world management of national and other resources, material and non-material.” – 150

“Sovereignty and the Common Heritage of Mankind… the first objective to be achieved is the attainment by Third World countries of full sovereignty over their resources in compliance with the UNCERDS [United Nations Charter of the Economic Rights and Duties of States]. Only after this objective has been achieved can the concept of the common heritage of mankind, traditionally limited to resources considered as res nullius such as the oceans and outer space, be expanded to new domains such as mineral resources, science and technology, means of production and other sources of wealth. After the exercise of national sovereignty has contributed toward the creation of a more equitable international order, the aim should be to pool all world resources – material and non-material – with a view to ensuring effective planning and management of the world economy and of global resource use in a way which would meet the dual objectives of equity and efficiency. In this perspective resources would need to be managed on the basis of decentralized planetary sovereignty. Proposals contained in the following chapters for the application of the common heritage concept to particular fields should thus be viewed in this broader context.” – 123

Remember when you hear the term “Common Heritage of Mankind” it does not just refer to the oceans, atmosphere and outer space, it refers to all material and non-material resources. Anything that might be considered a source of wealth would be brought under strict international authority. Keep in mind non-material resources includes, among other things, the education of “human resources”.

Conclusion

The next part in this series discusses the generation of public opinion and the use of white coated propagandists. The creation of a World Food Authority and its use for population control is examined in part 5. The final article in this series deals with a variety of issues including global solidarity, regional unions, legal changes and a standing United Nations Peace Force.

[1] Quotes from Jan Tinbergen, RIO: Reshaping the International Order: A Report to the Club of Rome (1976). ISBN 0-525-04340-3

---

 

Reshaping Public Opinion and the White Coated Propagandists
Reshaping the International Order Part 4

Brent Jessop – Knowledge Driven Revolution.com
April 28, 2008

“Atomic and political scientists from Harvard University and MIT meeting in November 1975 concluded that an atomic war will certainly occur before the year 2000. This, they believed, could only be prevented by the decision of all nation-states to surrender their sovereignty to an authoritarian world government, a possibility they viewed as unlikely.” – RIO: Reshaping the International Order, 1976 (p46)

Public opinion is not generated by the public it is driven into them by marketing and propaganda. One of the main aspects of generating public opinion is the use of experts or specialists to tell the public what to think and give them a false sense of security derived from the belief that there are armies of experts making all of the difficult decisions for them. What if the legions of experts are just white coated propagandists?

The Club of Rome is a premiere think tank composed of approximately 100 members including leading scientists, philosophers, political advisors, former politicians and many other influential bureaucrats and technocrats. This series of articles describes the major conclusions of the 1976 book Rio: Reshaping the International Order: A Report to the Club of Rome [1] coordinated by Nobel Laureate Jan Tinbergen. The RIO report “addresses the following question: what new international order should be recommended to the world’s statesmen and social groups so as to meet, to the extent practically and realistically possible, the urgent needs of today’s population and the probable needs of future generations?”

Part 1 of this series gives an overview of the proposed new international order described by the RIO report as “humanistic socialism”. This includes: collective neighbourhood armies, a fully planned world economy, global free trade, public international enterprises, proposed changes in consumption patterns among other topics. Changes to the financial system including international taxation and the creation of a World Treasury, World Central Bank and World Currency are examined in part 2. Part 3 addresses the redefinition of sovereignty from “territorial sovereignty” to “functional sovereignty” as well as the use of the concept of the “common heritage of mankind” to gain international control of not just the oceans, atmosphere and outer space but also all material and non-material resources.

Importance of Public Opinion

Any attempt at creating a new international order requires the reshaping of public opinion from their current modes of thought into newer more appropriate forms. This important detail was not overlooked by The Club of Rome.

From RIO: Reshaping the International Order:

[Italicised text is original emphasis and bolded text is added by author.]

“The possibility of implementing ideas of a new power structure would, in democratic societies, necessitate the acceptance of such ideas by wide sections of public opinion. It is of paramount importance, therefore, that new ways and means be found to establish, within industrialized countries, contacts between formal and informal groups of concerned citizens, scientists and politicians…” – 109

“Political feasibility. Crucially important especially during the early phases of the transformation of the existing order…” – 101

“Development implies a constant destruction of sociological and psychological structures. The real problem of development is cleverly to balance positive and real improvements with severe destructions… It is the responsibility of every nation to make its own choice between economic progress and socio-psych structure destructions, and to define its own fundamental objectives for real development, which is the development of man as a totality and of the totality of men.” – (Part of RIO member Maurice Guernier’s position statement) – 321

“The satisfaction of needs implies that each person available for and willing to work should have an adequately remunerated job… Education is the most important non-material component for fulfilling individual ambitions… At a higher level, education not only contributes directly to individual satisfaction by developing that individual’s spiritual endowment, but also indirectly by preparing the individual, mentally as well as morally, for a future role in a changing world…” – 64

Reshaping Public Opinion

Public opinion is not generated from the public, but rather given to them from politicians, experts, fiction, news media, etc.

“Public opinion is no phenomenon sui generic. It is in part the result of government policies and by definition politicians cannot hide behind their own creation. If some sectors of public opinion in the industrialized countries are immersed in the rhetoric and slogans associated with misunderstanding, then much of this may be inherited from their political leaders. And if these leaders are in part responsible for a situation which impedes acceptance of the need for change, then they themselves must be held responsible for changing this situation.” – 110

No Technocracy, Just White Coated Propagandists

“One of our main weapons in this search is the vast arsenal of scientists we are potentially able to deploy. To fully utilize this resource, we must deliberately choose to focus investigation in directions we believe to be really relevant.” – 107

“In political process too, the search for ‘new combinations’ can be expected to produce valuable results. Such a search is likely to demonstrate the responsibilities which scientists and other specialists have, not only to their nations, but also to the constituency of mankind. In the past, specialists have often been reluctant to engage in political debate or to share their knowledge and fears with the general public. Given social dilemmas, they have often preferred to adopt neutral rather than value positions, to tacitly advise rather than openly advocate. This generalization no longer holds true. In many branches of science there are radical movements. Increasingly, both in the rich and poor worlds, scientists are involved in active advocacy which they see as an intellectual and ethical duty.

These observations suggest that specialists be provided with greater opportunities to participate in the making of decisions in areas of vital importance to the future of mankind This is not to suggest the creation of a technocracy nor that political will can ever be substituted by scientific expertise… Specialists must serve as ‘advocates of the unborn’ and the expansion of their role can be viewed as an example of functional representation in international decision-making.

Not only must specialists advocate courses of action in international fora, they must also more fully commit themselves to development efforts at the local level. Their commitment must be total, their allegiance to a problem or community unstinting. Experts operating through bilateral and multilateral channels have not always meet these requirements. The ‘new expert’, in actively promoting local self-reliant development, may need to subordinate his own values even his knowledge, to those of the community he is attempting to serve. We have seen the rise of ‘barefoot doctors’; we must encourage the rise of ‘barefoot experts’.” – 108

The above quote clearly states that the “new experts” should form a league of white coated propagandists willing to subordinate their knowledge (the only thing they have to offer) to a desired political agenda. It should also be noted the use of the term “functional representation”. This is significant because the Club of Rome redefines sovereignty from what they call “territorial sovereignty” to “functional sovereignty” completely changing the meaning of sovereignty. More on the redefinition of sovereignty here.

Using Other Groups

“The most important options for organizing institutions lie in three main areas. The first relates to the way in which the means of operating society are grouped into bunches which can appropriately be handled by one institution. From the viewpoint of efficiency, the most suitable approach would be to group together those means requiring similar techniques of control. The second option concerns the various levels of decision-making and the hierarchy corresponding to it. This important structural consideration applies to single institutions as well as to the relationship between persons and between institutions. … Third… Membership should not be limited to national governments; it should also embrace non-governmental organizations of many kinds operating at different levels.” – 101

“Whereas national public opinion may exist in the singular, internationally it exists in the plural… Groups of many different kinds, both in and outside the production process – students, trade unions, scientists – from both the Third World and the industrialized countries should join forces in their attempts to shape public and political opinion. The aim here must be the internationalization of attempts at ‘conscience-raising’. There would appear to be tremendous scope for a range of non-governmental organizations in this field and for cooperation among them.” – 111

“… a conscious attempt must be made to organize intellectual and political lobbies to re-educate international public and political opinion.” – 177

“Convincing Public and Political Opinion: Coordinated and intensified effort should be made, particularly in industrialized countries, to publicize the need to create an international social and economic order which is perceived as more equitable by all peoples. … The primary task of many non-governmental organizations must be to undertake the effort suggested.” – 122

The Ministry of Third World Truth

The Club of Rome proposes the creation of a Ministry of Third World Truth to help shape international public opinion.

“Such reform [of news media] should include the creation of a Third World information centre to specifically serve Third World needs and to facilitate the dissemination of information on the Third World, both in industrialized and Third World countries.” – 111

Conclusion

The creation of a World Food Authority and its use for population control is examined in part 5. The final article in this series deals with a variety of issues including global solidarity, regional unions, legal changes and a standing United Nations Peace Force.

[1] Quotes from Jan Tinbergen, RIO: Reshaping the International Order: A Report to the Club of Rome (1976). ISBN 0-525-04340-3

---

 

Population Control and a World Food Authority
Reshaping the International Order Part 5

Brent Jessop – Knowledge Driven Revolution.com
May 5, 2008

“… it is of utmost importance that an equilibrium be established between the world’s total population and the capacity of ‘spaceship earth’…” – RIO: Reshaping the International Order, 1976 (p124)

The establishment of a World Food Authority to control the food supply of the world is a major goal of The Club of Rome’s RIO report. This issue is intertwined with exaggerated fears of environmental collapse and the elite’s obsession with population control.

The Club of Rome is a premiere think tank composed of approximately 100 members including leading scientists, philosophers, political advisors, former politicians and many other influential bureaucrats and technocrats. This series of articles describes the major conclusions of the 1976 book Rio: Reshaping the International Order: A Report to the Club of Rome [1] coordinated by Nobel Laureate Jan Tinbergen. The RIO report “addresses the following question: what new international order should be recommended to the world’s statesmen and social groups so as to meet, to the extent practically and realistically possible, the urgent needs of today’s population and the probable needs of future generations?”

Part 1 of this series gives an overview of the proposed new international order described by the RIO report as “humanistic socialism”. This includes: collective neighbourhood armies, a fully planned world economy, global free trade, public international enterprises, proposed changes in consumption patterns among other topics. Changes to the financial system including international taxation and the creation of a World Treasury, World Central Bank and World Currency are examined in part 2. Part 3 addresses the redefinition of sovereignty from “territorial sovereignty” to “functional sovereignty” as well as the use of the concept of the “common heritage of mankind” to gain international control of not just the oceans, atmosphere and outer space but also all material and non-material resources. Part 4 discusses the generation of public opinion and the use of white coated propagandists.

The Environmental Scare

From RIO: Reshaping the International Order:

[Italicised text is original emphasis and bolded text is added by author.]

“History has frequently shown that people, in times of crisis and once convinced of the necessity for change, are prepared to accept policies which demand changes in their behaviour so as to help secure better lives for themselves and their children.” – 110

The threat of environmental catastrophe to further the population control agenda is nothing new and continues to this day with the manmade global warming scare. Back in the 1970′s the Club of Rome was not shy at using the environmental catastrophe card to push for population control. Below are some examples from RIO: Reshaping the International Order:

“Moreover, it has been estimated that by 1985 all land surfaces, except those so cold or at such high altitudes as to be incompatible with human habitation or exploration, will have been occupied and utilized by man.” – 89

“Although not yet proven, climatologists are being forced to conclude that our planet has in recent times passed through a period which may well have been optimal as far as food production is concerned. They believe that future decades may well be characterized by extremes – hot and cold, wet and dry – without necessarily a change in average temperature. (4)” – 90

The endnote used to back up this claim is given below:

“(4) There is certainly sufficient evidence for this concern: the Asian monsoons were unsatisfactory for three successive years between 1972-1974; severe droughts in the Sahel and other parts of Africa and the Great Plains area of the United States and Canada in 1974; an unexpected late frost in Brazil in 1975 which may have destroyed as much as 60 per cent of its 1976 coffee crop. The growing season of the best grain producing areas in the Soviet Union is now believed to [be] about a week shorter than it was in the 1950′s; an even more pronounced shift appears to have taken place in the United Kingdom.” – 97

Do these types of arguments sound familiar?

“Much effort has been made in the past ten years, in some industrialized countries, to bring the disadvantage facing many Third World countries to the attention of large numbers of people. If it has met with only limited success, it is probably because it has failed to bring out the concept of interdependence of countries and issues. More attention must in future be focused on information and education on how our planet functions and on the ‘survival fact’ that the claim of the whole is wider and deeper than the claim of any of its parts. There is also a fundamental need to develop a broadly educated political class which is capable of understanding science and the broad implications, possibilities and dangers of technological advance, and which can harness technological advance for constructive social purposes.” – 111

Population Control and The World Food Authority

“… these threats [of food shortage] might well be exacerbated by increasing population pressures and deteriorating climatological conditions.” – 135

“Population control policies carry the important indirect consequence of restricting the supply of unskilled labour, thereby raising its price.” – 73

“If the world is to be liberated from the continual nightmares of hunger and malnutrition, these and the various measures proposed by the FAO [Food and Agricultural Organization] Worlds Food Conference should be implemented to the full and call for the creation of the World Food Authority, with extensive and real powers; or, as a second best, the World Food Council proposed by the World Food Conference.” – 138

“internationally owned and internationally managed [food] buffer stocks…” – 226

“the question of introducing meat rationing should be seriously considered [for developed countries].” – 227

Food as a Weapon

The incredible power that would be accomplished from a massive concentration of food stocks under the control of a single agency did not escape the authors of this report to the Club of Rome. The reigning food situation in the world was dominated by the great dependence of many countries on the North American breadbasket. This gave the Americans a considerable amount of power over their dependent countries.

“the American Secretary for Agriculture who has observed: “Food is a weapon. It is one of the principal tools in our negotiating kit” ” – 29

The further centralization of food stocks under a single international power would only increase the abuse of food supplies not decrease it. This, quite naturally, is the point. The result of this control is well described by Bertrand Russell (who strongly supported this idea) in his 1952 book The Impact of Science of Society [2]:

“To deal with this problem [increasing population and decreasing food supplies] it will be necessary to find ways of preventing an increase in world population. If this is to be done otherwise than by wars, pestilence, and famines, it will demand a powerful international authority. This authority should deal out the world’s food to the various nations in proportion to their population at the time of the establishment of the authority. If any nation subsequently increased its population it should not on that account receive any more food. The motive for not increasing population would therefore be very compelling. What method of preventing an increase might be preferred should be left to each state to decide.” – 124

Conclusion

The final article in this series deals with a variety of issues including global solidarity, regional unions, legal changes and a standing United Nations Peace Force.

[1] Quotes from Jan Tinbergen, RIO: Reshaping the International Order: A Report to the Club of Rome (1976). ISBN 0-525-04340-3

[2] Quotes from Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society (1952). ISBN 0-415-10906-X

---

A Glimpse into the New Order
Reshaping the International Order Part 6

Brent Jessop – Knowledge Driven Revolution.com
May 12, 2008

“To obtain an equitable international social and economic order efforts will to be made by everyone… every single member of the world’s population.” – RIO: Reshaping the International Order, 1976 (p100)

This article examines a variety of issues derived from a report to The Club of Rome entitled RIO: Reshaping the International Order. These issues include legal changes for a new social order, regional unions, global solidarity, the East-West dialectic, a standing United Nations Peace Force and the redefinition of rights and freedom.

The Club of Rome is a premiere think tank composed of approximately 100 members including leading scientists, philosophers, political advisors, former politicians and many other influential bureaucrats and technocrats. This series of articles describes the major conclusions of the 1976 book Rio: Reshaping the International Order: A Report to the Club of Rome coordinated by Nobel Laureate Jan Tinbergen. The RIO report “addresses the following question: what new international order should be recommended to the world’s statesmen and social groups so as to meet, to the extent practically and realistically possible, the urgent needs of today’s population and the probable needs of future generations?”

Part 1 of this series gives an overview of the proposed new international order described by the RIO report as “humanistic socialism”. This includes: collective neighbourhood armies, a fully planned world economy, global free trade, public international enterprises, proposed changes in consumption patterns among other topics. Changes to the financial system including international taxation and the creation of a World Treasury, World Central Bank and World Currency are examined in part 2. Part 3 addresses the redefinition of sovereignty from “territorial sovereignty” to “functional sovereignty” as well as the use of the concept of the “common heritage of mankind” to gain international control of not just the oceans, atmosphere and outer space but also all material and non-material resources. Part 4 discusses the generation of public opinion and the use of white coated propagandists. The creation of a World Food Authority and its use for population control is examined in part 5.

Legal Foundation of the New Order

From RIO: Reshaping the International Order:

[Italicised text is original emphasis and bolded text is added by author.]

“The legal challenge posed by the new international order can be viewed as the transformation of a system of law based upon Western European culture into the law of the world community. … The [legal] treaty would not represent an attempt to negotiate a new world order in ‘one go’. … In that it would lay down the ‘rules of the international game’, the framework treaty might resemble an international Treaty of Rome, although inevitably much less detailed. … In addition to laying the legal basis for the creation of a new world order, the framework treaty, which could be negotiated within the U.N. system,…” -114

“The Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States already lays down the fundamental principles which should govern international economic relations. The transformation, over time, of the Charter into the proposed framework treaty would greatly facilitate the establishment of a new international order. If this is to be done, some more specific provisions, omitted from the Charter, should be considered for inclusion in the framework treaty. Such provisions could include:

(a) All States shall facilitate access to technology and scientific information;

(b) All States have the obligation to expand and liberalize international trade;

(c) Ocean space and the atmosphere beyond precise limits of national jurisdiction are the common heritage of all mankind: as such they shall be administered exclusively for peaceful purposes through international mechanisms with the participation of all States and their resources shall be exploited with particular regard to the interest of poor countries;

(d) Developed countries have the duty to ensure that net flows of real resources to poor countries shall not be less than the targets established by the U.N. General Assembly;…

(g) All States shall accept an international currency to be created by an international authority;

(h) All States shall accept the evolution of a world organization with the necessary power to plan, to make decisions and to enforce them.” – 117

“[Expansion of] the Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States… should not be envisage until major elements of the new order have been adopted by international agreement.” – 123

Regional Unions in the New Order

“Regional Integration… should be encouraged as a way:… (iii) to exploit more fully the opportunities for closer integration – up to monetary, economic and political union – that will be possible, for a long time to come, only between countries whose close interdependence on one another can generate political support for, and acceptance of, the partial mergers of ‘national sovereignty’ indispensable for such beneficial integration of their policies and institutions.” – 208

“Regional integration and harmonization can help to the extent that it widens markets and avoids wasteful competition for capital; that the manufacturing industries correspond to regionally planned priorities and are effectively controlled by the countries entering into the integration process.” – 238

Global Solidarity in the New Order

“These changes call for massive innovations in and the redirection of systems of formal and informal education. A new world can only be built through solidarity of the world’s people and the participation of large masses of people – hundreds of millions, not hundreds of thousands. The development of global awareness is a prerequisite to the peaceful creation of a new world order. It can even be said that the cultural and educational upgrading which global awareness implies, entails – or is equal to – the new order.” – 77

“they [International Institutions] must be integrated into an all embracing approach aimed at facing the global challenge of the world of today. This approach should be guided by three fundamental objectives, i.e. greater democracy, greater efficiency and greater solidarity.” – 43

“Since the rules of the game will have to be changed to create a new international order, a popularly-based desire for solidarity with developing countries must be established in the developed countries…” – 259

“Solidarity must also permeate society as a whole and engender the feeling of common interest and brotherhood… Without it, it will be impossible to mobilize the capacity for imagination and to achieve the real will required to share society’s resources.” – 62

“… environmental awareness means in reality the introduction of the long term, of the diachronic solidarity with future generations. To the extent to which the protection of the environment may entail costs, these should be looked at as an investment in the future, offset as always by a sacrifice in current consumption and in most cases justified on economic grounds by the reduced cost of preventive actions compared to the costs of remedial ones.” – 162

“It is in the sphere of human environment that the interdependencies between nations are perhaps most clearly evident.” – 32

East-West Dialectic

“As for joint industrial ventures, recent data show that the contracts signed with Western enterprises greatly outnumber the arrangements between the Eastern European partners themselves. According to a Soviet publication, thirty projects involving multilateral agreements have been concluded since 1971 among CMEA countries, whereas in 1974 and 1975 the Soviet Union alone signed an almost equal number of contracts of cooperation with large enterprises from West Germany, France, Italy, Austria, Finland, Japan and the United States, some of them running into billions of dollars… Over-all trade compulsions and competition in world markets in the present international system have grown to the point of making interdependence the law of the world. It is a factor so strong that it overpowers even ideological differences: joint ventures between centrally planned nations and large capitalist enterprises are emerging every day.” – 80

The Standing Army of the New Order

“Ensuring World Security:… The planned and phased reduction in world defence spending, the reinforcement of the U.N. Peace Force together with a World Disarmament Agency…” – 122

“Very few countries have so far pledged their support of and contribution to a standing UN Peace Force. Every effort should be made to promote progress in establishing such a force as a means for peace keeping…” – 304

“Even ‘sky spies’, if operated by a world agency rather than a nation-state, have a clear potential for international peace-keeping.” – 42

Rights and Freedom in the New Order

“The fundamental aim formulated above has its roots in the conviction that all human beings have an equal right to a life of dignity and to satisfaction in their threefold capacities as citizen, producer and consumer.” – 61

“Freedom: History has shown that an increase in the freedom of one individual or of a nation can result in the reduction of another’s freedom in the same and different realm. Freedom must thus be viewed as the maximum compatible with that of others.” – 61

“As a counterpart to these rights, a number of duties must be accepted, especially the duty to use one’s capacities in the interest of an adequate level of production…” – 63

[1] Quotes from Jan Tinbergen, RIO: Reshaping the International Order: A Report to the Club of Rome (1976). ISBN 0-525-04340-3

---

Also see series on Mankind at the Turning Point: The Second Report to The Club of Rome

The Number 1 Reason YOU became a Slave

Brent Jessop || December 14, 2005
Knowledge Driven Revolution

“Once a nation parts with the control of its currency and credit… all talk of the sovereignty of Parliament and of democracy is idle and futile” – Mackenzie King, 1935

The number 1 reason we became slaves is our complete ignorance to what money is and how it is created. The monetary systems of all the G-8 countries – including Canada – are specifically designed to force the average person and the country into debt.

You may think that because you have no personal debt that you are debt free. This is not true. As our national debt grows the value of our dollar shrinks. Combined with inflation you are loosing a lot of money.

In 2004-2005 the government paid 17.3% of all taxes collected toward ONLY THE INTEREST on the public debt. When I say the “government paid” I really mean the people of Canada since the government has no money of its own. So every dollar that you pay in taxes 17 cents of that goes directly to the private banks! This is actually a small percentage due to the low interest rates. In 1990-1991 this value peaked at 39 cents for every dollar!

What do you think we could spend this money on if it wasn’t going to the private banking system? Health care? Education? Tax cuts?

The following is a quick, simple to understand tutorial on the basics of how money is created in Canada. It explains how simple it is for us to remove ourselves from the debt cycle by printing our own money to be paid back at virtually no interest instead of borrowing the money from the private banking system at much higher interest rates (currently at 3.25%). We are printing about 5% of the money through the Bank of Canada and the other 95% comes from private banks.

The Committee on Monetary and Economic Reform

Since the numbers in the tutorial are a few years old here is a small update to the figures. You may have heard that our government has run a budget surplus for the past 8 years (1997-2005) and to their credit have reduced our Net Debt from $607.9 to 554.7 billion (Table 9). These numbers can be deceiving.

This debt reduction of $53.2 billion since 1997 had some help. In 1999 the government passed the Budget Implementation Act which allowed them to steal over $30 billion directly from public service pension surpluses. So, of this $53.2 billion reduction in the public debt, over $30 billion was “borrowed” from pensions that still need to be paid out! I am no accountant but this is just another form of debt. What will happen if the pension funds are running low on money?
One more small example from this past budget of 2004-2005. Canada’s debt dropped slightly by $1.6 billion ($556.3 – 554.7). But in September of 2004 our government sold off the remaining 50 million shares of Petro-Canada for $2.6 billion (Footnote under Table 3). Not exactly the sustainable budget surplus it is hyped up to be.

Note: The government decided to sell the shares of Petro-Canada which it owned since 1975, shortly after the stock had dropped by more than 12%. Good time to sell?

Why are you a Slave?

Imagine for a second that you are in charge of the private banks that print our money (and all G-8 country’s money) out of nothing and get billions of dollars back in the form of interest. What would you do with essentially an endless supply of money – more then you could possibly spend in a lifetime? It becomes a question of not what you can buy but who you can control – power becomes the driving force. Below is a 45 min video describing how this “capitalist banker conspiracy” functions. It may sound a little crazy but think about how well 9-11 fits into the “pressure from above, pressure from below” framework. This video was made well before 9-11.

G. Edward Griffin’s – Capitalist Conspiracy
There is also a much newer movie by Daniel Hopsicker about the banking elite and the corrupt history of the Federal Reserve located on this website entitled The Masters of The Universe.

Should we use the Gold Standard?

The video above suggests that we should use the gold standard instead of leaving our government with the ability to manipulate our monetary system. When you consider how corrupted our government is (or could become in the future) this is the obvious solution.

But what happens if someone becomes powerful enough to manipulate the price of gold?

I am not going to pretend to have all the answers to removing the control the bankers have over us. But the longer we wait the more power and more control they are going to accumulate. The first step is to spread the word about this evil that has enslaved us. We have to remember that there are very few of them and millions of us. Their control is only superficial when people become educated.

Related Article: Bankers Enthroned – Why the NDP won’t save you and details about the current bank mergers and their expansion into other financial areas.

Money for the People, and by the People
Canadian Democratic Movement || October 31, 2005

So, What Is Money?

Just as we need government for the people, and by the people, so we need money for the people, and by the people.

Money Reformers advocate essentially two things – firstly, that we change from a debt-based to a debt-free economy. That is, to a society where money, or a great deal of it, is supplied into the economy debt-free, meaning it does not require to be paid back. And secondly, Money Reformers advocate that the creation of money should be a public service, under public control for the public good.

Money is simply the medium we use to exchange goods and services. Without it, buying and selling would be impossible except, of course, by direct barter exchange.

Notes and coins are virtually worthless in their own right. They take on value only because people accept them, in exchange for goods and services. All the money in the world is useless in the middle of a barren desert.

To keep trade and economic activity functioning, there has to be enough of this medium of exchange called money in existence to allow economic activity to take place.

Hence the importance of ensuring that there is sufficient money in the economy to facilitate the exchange of goods and services, and hence the crucial importance that the creators of this money are under the direct control of the very people who need it to survive. That’s you and me.

WHERE DOES THE MONEY COME FROM?

Someone has to be responsible for making sure that there is enough money in existence. It’s not you. It’s not me. So who is it?

Each nation has a Central Bank to do this – in Canada, it’s the Bank of Canada.

Central Banks act as banker for the commercial banks, and the government – just as individuals and businesses keep accounts at commercial banks, so commercial banks and government keep accounts at the Central Bank – in our case, the Bank of Canada.

If the government wants to spend money on some public project such as a school or hospital then it will collect the money from taxes, but every year the government fails to collect enough money in taxes to pay for all its spending requirements. There is always a shortfall. So what does it do? Where does it go for money?

The government “borrows” the money this way: It prints and sells “gilt edged securities”. These are simply pieces of paper which promise an additional return to the buyer, in the future. The securities are auctioned several times a year to meet the shortage of government revenue as it arises. They are bought by individuals, insurance companies, pension funds, trust funds, and banks.

The government takes the money it has raised by these sales, and spends it on its public projects. The sum owed by the government is called “the National Debt”. These securities are becoming due regularly. That is, the government has to pay back the amount, with interest.

When the non-banking sector (individuals, insurance, pension and trust funds) buy securities, then saved money is being recycled back into the economy through government spending.

However, when banks buy government securities, then entirely new money – which has been created out of nothing by the banks specifically for these purchases – is spent into the economy by the government. The government has to find the money to repay them in full, with interest, which it does by selling even more securities and raising taxes even further! Now that’s just government debt that we’re saddled with, and have to pay back in our taxes.

ALMOST ALL MONEY ENTERS SOCIETY AS A DEBT

Money enters in other ways. There is also the money which enters society via our private debts as individuals, which we owe to commercial private banks.

It is a myth that these banks lend money they already have. When was the last time you went to your bank and found there was money missing from your account because it had been lent to someone else! Like the ancient money lenders of old, banks can lend out more than they actually hold!

The fact is that banks create money out of nothing and lend it to you at interest.

There is also commercial company debts owed to commercial banks, and there is international, or what is called “Third World” debt.

The crucial point to realise is that all of these debts – government, private, commercial and international – are debts owed to the banking system in one way or another.

Almost the entire stock of money circulating in every country in the world today represents a debt owed to the banking system. only the note and coin issue is debt-free.

The entire financial system of all nations today is what we call debt-based; meaning that the process of going into debt is relied upon, almost exclusively, by governments, to create and supply money to their economies.

The world runs o�n debt. We live in a debt-based society. We cannot get money into society without almost all of it entering, at source, as a debt.

THE POSITIVE VERSUS THE NEGATIVE ECONOMY

Money Reformers make two distinctions when we look at the economic world around us. on one hand we recognise and support the positive economy, which is characterised by mutual trade for mutual benefit, and productive, just, sustainable enterprise.

On the other hand, we have the negative economy, characterised by poverty, cut-throat competition, oppression, exploitation, war, waste, inflation, and starvation.

When we look around ourselves we are often forced to acknowledge that the economy we live in is often not a positive economy of mutual trade for mutual benefit, but rather a dog-eat-dog economy, a cannibal capitalism which has a tendency to eat itself and all those caught in it.

Money Reformers are alone today in recognising that many of the ills of the world are due directly to the twin facts that the economy of the world is based on debt – rather than on debt-free principles – and the power to create the money in the first place, is vested in the hands of a tiny minority. Recognise that the debt-engine drives the world economy in many negative directions.

Moreover, while some people highlight “the redistribution of wealth” as a possible solution, Money Reformers, highlight the fundamental monopoly power of money creation enjoyed by the few to the detriment of the many.

The fact that many of the economic and social ills which beset society and the world today are due to the power to create money being concentrated in the hands of a tiny minority, rather than democratically distributed in the hands of the People.

This democratic imperative can be summed up in the slogans: It’s the People’s Money and Money for the People, and by the People.

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR DEMOCRACY?

Banks are businesses out to make profits. Since they alone decide to whom they will lend, they effectively decide what is produced, where it is produced and who produces it, and all on the basis of profitability to the bank, rather than what is beneficial to the community.

Our money, instead of being supplied debt-free as a means of exchange, now comes as a debt owed to bankers providing them with vast profits, power and control, as the rest of us struggle with an increasing burden of debt.

By supplying money to those of whom they approve and denying it to those of whom they disapprove, financiers can create boom or bust, and support or undermine individuals, organisations, economies and governments.

We, the people, don’t have the power to create the money. The money we require just to survive is only available from the banks. To a large extent, we are at the mercy of the banking system and we are effectively enslaved by them. We cry Freedom from Debt Slavery!

Until the power to create money is taken out of the hands of the banks, and the hands of the private interests who do it for profit and control, then we can never say that we live in a democracy.

The nation’s economy is our economy. We create the real wealth through our ingenuity, enterprise and hard work. The current banking system operates as a massive drain on that public wealth as well as concentrating power and control in the hands of a tiny, private minority.

So what do we need to do? Essentially, we need to move towards an economy based upon debt-free principles where much more money than at present comes into society debt-free, and we need to move towards democratic control over the money creation process.

PRINCIPLES OF DEBT-FREE FINANCE

Money must be based on the real wealth of society – that is, on people, skills and materials. If you have the people, skills and materials, then that which is physically possible and socially desirable can be made financially possible.

If the people have something they want to do in their community, and if they have the skills and the materials, then they should not be prevented for “lack of money”.

The overall purpose of an economic system is simply to provide goods and services – as, when and where required – in order to satisfy human needs.

Money is simply the means of exchange for the goods and services produced by the people and their skills and resources. It is not a commodity in itself.

In this regard, money should be our servant – not our master. And since money, at source, is created out of nothing, there is no need for it to be scarce.

SO HERE’S THE LEAST WE SHOULD BE DEMANDING

For a start, we can see that we’re paying our taxes to enrich a banking system which never had the money in the first place!

We can see that the government is raising money it doesn’t have, by borrowing from banks which don’t have the money either, but only the legal authority to create out of nothing.

The government then expects us, through our taxes, to pay back the banks with the real money that we’ve worked for! The obvious question arises: Why doesn’t the government just create the money itself?

Instead of borrowing the money from the banking system, and forcing us to pay it back in our taxes, the government could simply create the money itself, spend it into society and not need to ask for it back.

And, yes, the government – or a state appointed authority – could do exactly that. Instead it enslaves us all to the banking system and that’s a scandal!

How We Are Paying For the Introduction of a Global Dictatorship-regime

Posted by Anders under English, Euromed

Who is profiting from the present planned global financial crisis?
The EU? “Times of economic difficulty have accelerated integration. The EU needs to move beyond past failures” – although just now the EU rather seems to be dissolving.
Who profits from the collapse of the present financial order to create a new, possibly gold-based order as advocated by the CFR-illuminist, former FED-boss Alan Greenspan? Who is to “police” the coming new financial world order? The IMF?
“What has been most important of this crisis in terms of global governance, has been the ability for central bankers to operate very quickly together” (US Council on Foreign Relations).

On Sept. 22, 2008, Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur said on the floor of the House (excerpt): Let’s play Wall Street Bailout.
Rule one: Rush the decision. Time the game to fall in the week before Congress is set to adjourn and just six weeks before a historic election so your opponents will be preoccupied, pressured, distracted, and in a hurry.
Rule two: Disarm the public through fear. Warn that the entire global financial system will collapse and the world will fall into another Great Depression. Control the media enough to ensure that the public will not notice this. Bailout will indebt them for generations, taking from them trillions of dollars they earned and deserve to keep.
Rule three: Hide from the public and most of the Congress just who is arranging this deal. Communicate with the public through leaks to media insiders. Limit any open congressional hearings. Communicate with Congress via private teleconferencing calls. Heighten political anxiety by contacting each political party separately. Treat members of Congress condescendingly, telling them that the matter is so complex that they must rely on those few insiders who really do know what’s going on.
Rule four: Divert attention and keep people confused. Manage the news cycle so Congress and the public have no time to examine who destroyed the prudent banking system that served America so well for 60 years after the financial meltdown of the 1920s.
Rule five: Always keep in mind the goal is to privatize gains to a few and socialize loss to the many. For 30 years in one financial scandal after another, Wall Street game masters have kept billions of dollars of their gain and shifted their losses to American taxpayers. Once this bailout is in place, the greed game will begin again.

This inspiring speech and Ms. Kaptur´s fascinating body language can be seen on this video.

On Sept 19, 2008 the blog ”Radio Utopie” pointed to the following in an excellent survey.

The Paulson bail-out plan as published in the New York Times comprises some very thought-provoking elements (excerpt – in parentheses my comments)
Sec. 2. …The Secretary is authorized to purchase, and to make and fund commitments to purchase, on such terms and conditions as determined by the Secretary, mortgage-related assets from any financial institution having its headquarters in the United States.
(b) The Secretary is authorized to take such actions as the Secretary deems necessary to carry out the authorities in this Act, including, without limitation:
(1) appointing such employees as may be required …;
(2) entering into contracts…. without regard to any other provision of law regarding public contracts;
(3) designating financial institutions as financial agents of the Government, and they shall perform all such reasonable duties related to this Act as financial agents of the Government as may be required of them; (The FED? Goldman Sachs? Morgan Stanley? J.P. Morgan?)
(a)The Secretary may, at any time, exercise any rights received in connection with mortgage-related assets purchased under this Act.
(b) The Secretary shall have authority to manage mortgage-related assets purchased under this Act.
(c) The Secretary may, at any time, upon terms and conditions and at prices determined by the Secretary, sell, or enter into securities loans.
Sec. 7. For the costs of administering those authorities, the Secretary may use the proceeds of the sale of any securities issued , including the payment of administrative expenses.
(Letting the criminal Wall Street bankers manage taxpayer money once more is letting the fox guard the hen house)
Sec. 8. Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency. (“What I do with taxpayer money is not for the searchlight of publicity. And it is so criminal that I don´t want to be held responsible for it!”)

Comment
Paulson is taking financial dictatorship on behalf of his illuminist masters in the Council on Foreign Relation, the Bilderberg Group and Goldman Sachs the CEO and Chairman of the Board he was until he became Secretary of the Treasury.

And he will give the Wall Street criminals taxpayer money for their valueless securities which they have already once emptied of values as well as probably reengage that ilk to manage the real estate of Americans which he buys for a song
Finanzblatt 7 Oct, 2008: As the Fed announced it wants unsecured short-term bonds, to buy so-called commercial papers in the future, and make liquidity available to the issuants. The measure is unheard-of in the nearly 100 years of history of the Fed, because Commercial Papers due to the crisis on the financial markets have often been made valueless.

The Mail Online 2 Oct, 2008: Pressure was today mounting on Gordon Brown to clarify his drastic £1.9trillion bank bail-out designed to restore confidence in the City.
The plan was unveiled last night and involves raising the personal savings guarantee to £50,000. The Prime Minister has taken the unusual step of hiring bankers UBS and N M Rothschild & Sons (both Rothscild banks) to advise him on a possible bail-out deal, independent of Chancellor Alistair Darling.

Comment
This is the Hegelian recipe to introduce the New World Order
1. Thesis: Create a financial crisis by quickly lowering the interest rates and letting everybody without means buy real estate and other goods by means of cheap credits. Thereby, demand and so prices will inevitably rise and bring the bankers a lot of money. Not only in the US this was a deliberate policy. In his election campaign 2007 Sarkozy is told to have recommended the poorest French to have plenty of mortgages, complaining that France was much too little endebted!!!
2. Antithesis: Withdraw credits, withdraw values from the real estate funds and raise interest rates quickly. The ensuing plummeting of bad loan and house values will bring about a financial crisis that can be paid for by the taxpayers and deepened and extended into a real-economic crisis by the mark-to-market rule making it impossible for banks to lend to each other and so to their customers.
3. Synthesis: During this worldwide crisis everyone will call for state expropriation of the banks and property – or they will be simply necessary. This change can be enforced by illuminist political rulers (Henry Paulson/Fed-chairman Bernanke) by rules giving them and the New World Order dictatorship by enforced law (death threats to Congress):

The Synthesis is interesting: Int. Herald Tribune 26 Sept: British Prime Minister Gordon Brown called Friday for “a new global financial order” to resolve the financial crisis currently roiling world markets – see his New World Order Speech on the right margin of this blog, too.

The failures of modern global capitalism have been brutally exposed in recent months. Opinion is now hardening around the case for a new global architecture to enforce rules.

Former (EU trade Commissioner) Peter Mandelson: new global solutions are needed because “the machinery of global economic governance barely exists”, adding: “It is time for a Bretton Woods for this century.”
In essence, any organisation with the power to police the global economy would have to include representatives of every major country – a United Nations of economic regulation.

Danny Gabay, a former Bank of England economist who now works for Fathom Consulting, suggested the answer might already be staring us in the face, in the form of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), the umbrella organisation for the committee that came up with the sensible Basle II Accord.

The BIS (Bank for International Settlement – proposed to be the regulator of world finance)
Andrew Hitchcock : Bis is a Rothschild Bank. In his “History of the Money Changers” he describes the names of the Rothschild agents founding the BIS in 1930. And he quotes Bill Clinton´s mentor, prof. Carroll Quigley:” The powers of financial capitalism had (a) far reaching (plan), nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert.
The apex of the system was to be the Bank For International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland.

Wikipedia: Bank for International Settlements (or BIS) is an international organization of central banks.

To be clear: Suggestions are now being made to make the Rothschild BIS the regulator of world economy – making the dreams of Amschel Mayer Rothschild (1773-1855), who in 1838 said: “Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws.”

As Markus Angelicus (1997) writes in his excellent survey of Rothschild´s control of the world´s gold: “If the Rothschilds, through the LBMA operations, are effectively cornering the world’s gold supply they would undoubtedly be in a prime position to benefit from a currency crisis – which they and Soros undoubtedly expect, given Soros’s claims that the Asian, and thus by implication all fiat currencies, are inherently unsustainable. This crisis of sustainability is already engaged in Asia and will undoubtedly wash over Europe, England and the U.S. And who recently announced another bailout package? “
No one knows where the Gold of the USA (apparently not in Fort Knox) and Norway is.

But here is an interesting and competent explanation for the fact that Rothschild left the LBMA in 2004:”Another possible reason for Rothschild’s withdrawal is a conviction that the better risk/reward ratio is found in buying gold and silver for vault storage than in trading them on the LBMA”. For Rothschild also declares to continue its mining activities!!

Enforcing gold standard by very rude means, because money supply thereby is easily controlled, is an old Rothschild strategy. The 1896 presidential elections were lost by the Rothschild opponent over this topic.

The Telegraph, 8 Oct 2008 : J K Galbraith wrote in 1954 about the Great Wall Street Crash in 1929: “Men have been swindled by other men on many occasions. The autumn of 1929 was, perhaps, the first occasion when men succeeded on a large scale in swindling themselves. As now, too few understood this. Many who foresaw disaster kept quiet. There was a conspiracy of silence. “The foolish thus [had] the field to themselves.”

In fact, the financial New World Order is already functioning, 6 cental banks lowering their interest rates in a concerted action on Oct. 8, 2008.

Here is an excerpt of what the President of the US Council on Foreign Relations, i.e. the body which rules the US and so the world, Richard Haas, wrote in 2006 on the New World Order:
“New mechanisms are needed for regional and global governance that include actors other than states.

States must be prepared to cede some sovereignty to world bodies.

Some governments are prepared to give up elements of sovereignty to address the threat of global climate change etc.

Globalisation thus implies that sovereignty is not only becoming weaker in reality, but that it needs to become weaker.”

And it certainly will be – due to financial world governance.

Here is a video showing the master plan of the New World Order.

from euro-med.dk: How We Are Paying For the Introduction of a Global Dictatorship-regime

The Impact of Science on Society

Scientific Technique and the Concentration of Power
The Impact of Science on Society Part 1

Brent Jessop – Knowledge Driven Revolution.com
January 14, 2008

“So long as the rulers are comfortable, what reason have they to improve the lot of their serfs?”- Bertrand Russell, 1952 (p61)

Bertrand Russell in his 1952 book The Impact of Science on Society* describes the effects of “scientific technique” on the increasing control of societies by an ever shrinking number of people. As we will see, “scientific technique” is much more than just the development and widespread use of new technology, but first some of its effects.

Bertrand Arthur William Russell, 3rd Earl Russell (1872-1970) was a renowned British philosopher and mathematician who was an adamant internationalist and worked extensively on the education of young children. He was the founder of the Pugwash movement which used the spectre of Cold War nuclear annihilation to push for world government. Among many other prizes, Russell was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1950 and UNESCO’s (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization) Kalinga prize in 1957.

Increasing Organization

From Impact of Science on Society:

“This [the telegraph] had two important consequences: first messages could now travel faster than human beings; secondly, in large organizations detailed control from a centre became much more possible than it had formerly been.

The fact that messages could travel faster than human beings was useful, above all, to the police…” – 33

“Electricity as a source of power is much more recent than the telegraph, and has not yet had all the effects of which it is capable. As an influence on social organisation its most notable feature is the importance of power stations, which inevitably promote centralisation… as soon as a community has become dependent upon them for lighting and heating and cooking. I lived in America in a farm-house which depended entirely upon electricity, and sometimes, in a blizzard, the wires would be blown down. The resulting inconvenience was almost intolerable. If we had been deliberately cut off for being rebels, we should soon have had to give in.” – 35

“But what is of most importance in this connection is the development of flying. Aeroplanes have increased immeasurably the power of governments. No rebellion can hope to succeed unless it is favoured by at least a portion of the air force.” – 36

“In industry, the integration brought about by scientific technique is much greater [than agriculture] and more intimate.

One of the most obvious results of industrialism is that a much larger percentage of the population live in towns than was formerly the case. The town dweller is a more social being than the agriculturist, and is much more influenced by discussion. In general, he works in a crowd, and his amusements are apt to take him into still larger crowds. The course of nature, the alternations of day and night, summer and winter, wet or shine, make little difference to him; he has no occasion to fear that he will be ruined by frost or drought or sudden rain. What matters to him is his human environment, and his place in various organisations especially.

Take a man who works in a factory, and consider how many organisations affect his life. There is first of all the factory itself, and any larger organisation of which it may be a part. Then there is the man’s trade union and his political party. He probably gets house room from a building society or public authority. His children go to school. If he reads a newspaper or goes to a cinema or looks at a football match, these things are provided by powerful organisations. Indirectly, through his employers, he is dependent upon those from whom they buy their raw material and those to whom they sell their finished product. Above all, there is the State, which taxes him and may at any moment order him to go and get killed in war, in return for which it protects him against murder and theft so long as there is peace, and allows him to buy a fixed modicum of food.” [emphasis mine] – 44

“The increase of organisation has brought into existence new positions of power. Every body has to have executive officials, in whom, at any moment, its power is concentrated. It is true that officials are usually subject to control, but the control may be slow and distant. From the young lady who sells stamps in a Post Office all the way up to the Prime Minister, every official is invested, for the time being, with some part of the power of the State. You can complain of the young lady if her manners are bad, and you can vote against the Prime Minister at the next election if you disapprove of his policy. But both the young lady and the Prime Minister can have a very considerable run for their money before (if ever) your discontent has any effect.” [emphasis mine] – 45

“The increased power of officials is an inevitable result of the greater degree of organisation that scientific technique brings about. It has the drawback that it is apt to be irresponsible, behind-the-scenes, power, like that of Emperors’ eunuchs and Kings’ mistresses in former times. To discover ways of controlling it is one of the most important political problems of our time. Liberals protested, successfully, against the power of kings and aristocrats; socialists protested against the power of capitalists. But unless the power of officials can be kept within bounds, socialism will mean little more than the substitution of one set of masters for another: all the former power of the capitalist will be inherited by the official. [emphasis mine]” – 47

“As we have seen, the question of freedom needs a completely fresh examination. There are forms of freedom that are desirable, and that are gravely threatened; there are other forms of freedom that are undesirable, but that are very difficult to curb… The resultant two-fold problem, of preserving liberty internally and diminishing it externally, is one that the world must solve, and solve soon, if scientific societies are to survive.

Let us consider for a moment the social psychology involved in this situation.

…The armed forces of one’s own nation exist – so each nation asserts – to prevent aggression by other nations. But the armed forces of other nations exist – or so many people believe – to promote aggression. If you say anything against the armed forces of your own country, you are a traitor, wishing to see your fatherland ground under the heel of a brutal conqueror. If, on the other hand, you defend a potential enemy State for thinking armed forces necessary to its safety, you malign your own country, whose unalterable devotion to peace only perverse malice could lead you to question…

And so it comes about that, whenever an organisation has a combatant purpose, its members are reluctant to criticise their officials and tend to acquiesce in usurpations and arbitrary exercise of power which, but for the war mentality, they would bitterly resent. It is the war mentality that gives officials and governments their opportunity. It is therefore only natural that officials and governments are prone to foster war mentality.” [emphasis mine] – 51

“I incline to think that ‘liberty’, as the word was understood in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, is no longer quite the right concept; I should prefer to substitute ‘opportunity for initiative’. And my reason for suggesting this change is the character of a scientific society.” – 68

More Organization is More Power

“The effect of the telegraph was to increase the power of the central government and diminish the initiative of distant subordinates. This applied not only to the State, but to every geographically extensive organization. We shall find a great deal of scientific technique has a similar effect. The result is that fewer men have executive power, but those few had more power than such men had formerly.” [emphasis mine] – 35

“We have seen that scientific technique increases the importance of organisations, and therefore the extent to which authority impinges upon the life of the individual. It follows that a scientific oligarchy has more power than any oligarchy could have in pre-scientific times. There is a tendency, which is inevitable unless consciously combated, for organisations to coalesce, and so to increase in size, until, ultimately, almost all become merged in the State. A scientific oligarchy, accordingly, is bound to become what is called ‘totalitarian’, that is to say, all important forms of power will become a monopoly of the State.” [emphasis mine] – 56

“In the first place, since the new oligarchs are the adherents of a certain creed, and base their claim to exclusive power upon the rightness of this creed, their system depends essentially upon dogma: whoever questions the governmental dogma questions the moral authority of the government, and is therefore a rebel. While the oligarchy is still new, there are sure to be other creeds, held with equal conviction, which must be suppressed by force, since the principle of majority rule has been abandoned. It follows that there cannot be freedom of the Press, freedom of discussion, or freedom of book publication. There must be an organ of government whose duty it is to pronounce as to what is orthodox, and to punish heresy. The history of the Inquisition shows what such an organ of government must inevitably become. In the normal pursuit of power, it will seek out more and more subtle heresies. The Church, as soon as it acquired political power, developed incredible refinement of dogma, and persecuted what to us appear microscopic deviations form the official creed. Exactly the same sort of thing happens in the modern States that confine political power to supporters of a certain doctrine.” – 57

“The completeness of the resulting control over opinion depends in various ways upon scientific technique. Where all children go to school, and all schools are controlled by the government, the authorities can close the minds of the young to everything contrary to official orthodoxy. Printing is impossible without paper, and all paper belongs to the State. Broadcasting and the cinema are equally public monopolies. The only remaining possibility of unauthorised propaganda is by secret whispers from one individual to another. But this, in turn, is rendered appallingly dangerous by improvements in the art of spying. Children at school are taught that it is their duty to denounce their parents if they allow themselves subversive utterances in the bosom of the family. No one can be sure that a man who seems to be his dearest friend will not denounce him to the police; the man may himself have been in some trouble, and may know that if he is not efficient as a spy his wife and children will suffer. All this is not imaginary, it is daily and hourly reality. Nor, given oligarchy, is there the slightest reason to expect anything else.” [emphasis mine] – 58

What is Scientific Technique?

Scientific technique is much more than just the impact of new technology on the machinations of society. It is the use of science, in its most calculating and inhumane ways, to analyze, control and guide societies in a desired direction. This topic was elaborated on in a couple of talks given by Alan Watt (here and here) particularly through the writings of Jacques Ellul.

The rest of the articles in this series will also elaborate on other aspects of scientific technique, especially its application to education and human breeding. But first, I will examine Bertrand Russell’s views about the stability of scientific societies and the possibility of a scientific world government.

*Quotes from Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society (1952). ISBN0-415-10906-X

Note: I first heard about this book from talks given by Alan Watt at Cutting Through The Matrix.com, an individual well worth looking into.

Limits to the Stability of a Scientific World Empire
The Impact of Science on Society Part 2

Brent Jessop – Knowledge Driven Revolution.com
January 21, 2008

“I do not believe that dictatorship is a lasting form of scientific society – unless (but this proviso is important) it can become world-wide.”- Bertrand Russell, 1952 (p67)

According to Bertrand Russell’s 1952 book The Impact of Science on Society* empires of the past were unable to sustain their control over ever distant regions of their dominion mostly due to the difficulty of maintaining effective centralized control over the actions of their subordinates. Scientific technique has removed this limitation. The only remaining obstacle to the creation of a truly worldwide empire is the establishment of a unifying principle to replace the fear of war.

Bertrand Arthur William Russell, 3rd Earl Russell (1872-1970) was a renowned British philosopher and mathematician who was an adamant internationalist and worked extensively on the education of young children. He was the founder of the Pugwash movement which used the spectre of Cold War nuclear annihilation to push for world government. Among many other prizes, Russell was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1950 and UNESCO’s (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization) Kalinga prize in 1957.

As previously discussed, The Impact of Science on Society described the increase in organization and centralization of power that resulted from the use of scientific technique.

Limits to the Size of an Empire

From The Impact of Science on Society:

“In any given state of technique there is a limit to size. The Roman Empire was stopped by German forests and African deserts… And before the telegraph large empires tended to break up because they could not be effectively controlled from the centre.

Communications have been hitherto the chief factor limiting the size of empires… This difficulty was diminished by railways and the telegraph, and is on the point of disappearing with the improvement of the long-range bomber. There would now be no technical difficulty about a single world-wide Empire. Since war is likely to become more destructive to human life than it has been in recent centuries, unification under a single world government is probably necessary unless we are to acquiesce in either a return to barbarism or the extinction of the human race.” [emphasis mine] – 36

“I think the evils that have grown up in Soviet Russia will exist, in a greater or less degree, wherever there is a scientific government which is securely established and is not dependent upon popular support. It is possible nowadays for a government to be very much more oppressive than any government could be before there was scientific technique. Propaganda makes persuasion easier for the government; public ownership of halls and paper makes counter-propaganda more difficult; and the effectiveness of modern armaments makes popular risings impossible. No revolution can succeed in a modern country unless it has the support of at least a considerable section of the armed forces. But the armed forces can be kept loyal by being given a higher standard of life than that of the average worker, and this is made easier by every step in the degradation of ordinary labour. Thus the very evils of the system help to give it stability. Apart from external pressure, there is no reason why such a regime should not last for a very long time.” [emphasis mine] – 61

War, the Chief Source of Social Cohesion

“What stands in the way [of world government]? Not physical or technical obstacles, but only the evil passions in human minds…” – 108

“…so long as there is imminent risk of war it is impossible to escape from the authority of the State except to a very limited degree. It is mainly war that has caused the excessive power of modern States, and until the fear of war is removed it is inevitable that everything should be subordinated to short-term efficiency. But I have thought it worth while to think for a moment of the world as it may be when a world government has ended the present nightmare dread of war.” – 75

“War has been, throughout history, the chief source of social cohesion; and since science began, it has been the strongest incentive to technical progress. Large groups have a better chance of victory than small ones, and therefore the usual result of war is to make States larger…

There is, it must be confessed, a psychological difficulty about a single world government. The chief source of social cohesion in the past, I repeat, has been war: the passions that inspire a feeling of unity are hate and fear. These depend upon the existence of an enemy, actual or potential. It seems to that a world government could only be kept in being by force, not by the spontaneous loyalty that now inspires a nation at war.” [emphasis mine] – 36

World Government

“As regards war, the principle of unrestricted national sovereignty, cherished by liberals in the nineteenth century and by the Kremlin in the present day, must be abandoned. Means must be found of subjecting the relations of nations to the rule of law, so that a single nation will no longer be, as at present, the judge in its own cause. If this is not done, the world will quickly return to barbarism. In that case, scientific technique will disappear along with science, and men will be able to go on being quarrelsome because their quarrels will no longer do much harm. It is, however, just possible that mankind may prefer to survive and prosper rather than to perish in misery, and, if so, national liberty will have to be effectively restrained.” – 50

“In the past, there were many sovereign States, any two of which might at any time quarrel. Attempts in the line of the League of Nations were bound to fail, because, when a dispute arose, the disputants were too proud to accept outside arbitration, and the neutrals were too lazy to enforce it. Now there are only two sovereign States: Russia (with satellites) and the United States (with satellites). If either becomes preponderant, either by victory or by an obvious military superiority, the preponderant Power can establish a single Authority over the whole world, and thus make future wars impossible. At first this Authority will , in certain regions, be based on force, but if the Western nations are in control, force will as soon as possible give way to consent. When that has been achieved, the most difficult of world problems will have been solved, and science can become wholly beneficent.” – 106

“There are three ways of securing a society that shall be stable as regards population. The first is that of birth control, the second that of infanticide or really destructive wars, and third that of general misery except for a powerful minority. All these methods have been practised… the third in the world as some Western internationalists hope to make it and in Soviet Russia.” [emphasis mine] – 117

“… a scientific world society cannot be stable unless there is a world government… unless there is a world government which secures universal birth control, there must from time to time be great wars, in which the penalty of defeat is widespread death by starvation… Unless, at some stage, one power or group of powers emerges victorious and proceeds to establish a single government of the world with a monopoly of armed forces, it is clear that the level of civilization must decline until scientific warfare becomes impossible – that is until science is extinct.” – 117

This last point is very important because the exact same theme was described by Zbigniew Brzezinski in his book The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives (1997). Brzezinski outlines his case for how current American global supremacy should be used to unify the world under the dictates of the United Nations. For more about The Grand Chessboard read this.

From The Grand Chessboard:

“Meeting these challenges is America’s burden as well as its unique responsibility. Given the reality of American democracy, an effective response will require generating a public understanding of the continuing importance of American power in shaping a widening framework of stable geopolitical cooperation, one that simultaneously averts global anarchy and successfully deters the emergence of a new power challenge. These two goals– averting global anarchy and impeding the emergence of a power rival– are inseparable from the longer-range definition of the purpose of America’s global engagement, namely, that of forging an enduring framework of global geopolitical cooperation.” [emphasis mine] – 214

“In brief, the U.S. policy goal must be unapologetically twofold: to perpetuate America’s own dominant position for at least a generation and preferably longer still; and to create a geopolitical framework that can absorb the inevitable shocks and strains of social-political change while evolving into the geopolitical core of shared responsibility for peaceful global management. A prolonged phase of gradually expanding cooperation with key Eurasian partners, both stimulated and arbitrated by America, can also help to foster the preconditions for an eventual upgrading of the existing and increasingly antiquated UN [United Nations] structures. A new distribution of responsibilities and privileges can then take into account the changed realities of global power, so drastically different from those of 1945.” [emphasis mine] – 215

Conclusion

The next article will examine Bertrand Russell’s views on population control and the scientific breeding of humans. The fourth and final part in this series will explore the use of education as the most powerful form of government propaganda.

Population Control and the Scientific Breeding of Humans
The Impact of Science on Society Part 3

Brent Jessop – Knowledge Driven Revolution.com
January 28, 2008

“If there is not to be an endless succession of wars, population will have to become stationary throughout the world, and this will probably have to be done, in many countries, as a result of governmental measures. This will require an extension of scientific technique into very intimate matters.” – Bertrand Russell, 1952 (p38)

Bertrand Russell in his 1952 book The Impact of Science on Society* describes a variety of methods that have been and could be used to reduce the population of the world to a more manageable size. Another very interrelated concept of a managed population size is the practice of eugenics. To be more precise, the practice of dysgenics for the commoners and eugenics for the aristocracy. Commoners will be bred to create a “submissive and docile disposition” while the aristocracy will be bred for much different qualities. “Gradually, by selective breeding the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species.”

Bertrand Arthur William Russell, 3rd Earl Russell (1872-1970) was a renowned British philosopher and mathematician who was an adamant internationalist and worked extensively on the education of young children. He was the founder of the Pugwash movement which used the spectre of Cold War nuclear annihilation to push for world government. Among many other prizes, Russell was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1950 and UNESCO’s (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization) Kalinga prize in 1957.

The first article in this series described how scientific technique centralizes power within a society. The second part examined the stability of a scientific society and Russell’s belief in the need for a world government.

Solutions to Overpopulation

From The Impact of Science on Society:

“But bad times, you may say, are exceptional, and can be dealt with by exceptional methods. This has been more or less true unless the increase in population can be enormously diminished. At present the population of the world is increasing at about 58,000 per diem. War, so far, has had no very great effect on this increase, which continued throughout each of the world wars.” [emphasis mine] – 115

“There are three ways of securing a society that shall be stable as regards population. The first is that of birth control, the second that of infanticide or really destructive wars, and third that of general misery except for a powerful minority.” – 117

“The nations which at present increase rapidly should be encouraged to adopt the methods by which, in the West, the increase of population has been checked. Educational propaganda, with government help, could achieve this result in a generation.” [emphasis mine] – 116

“… a scientific world society cannot be stable unless there is a world government… unless there is a world government which secures universal birth control, there must from time to time be great wars, in which the penalty of defeat is widespread death by starvation… Unless, at some stage, one power or group of powers emerges victorious and proceeds to establish a single government of the world with a monopoly of armed forces, it is clear that the level of civilization must decline until scientific warfare becomes impossible – that is until science is extinct.” [emphasis mine] – 117

“If raw materials are not to be used up too fast, there must not be free competition for their acquisition and use but an international authority to ration them in such quantities as may from time to time seem compatible with continued industrial prosperity. And similar considerations apply to soil conservation.” [emphasis mine] – 124

“To deal with this problem [increasing population and decreasing food supplies] it will be necessary to find ways of preventing an increase in world population. If this is to be done otherwise than by wars, pestilence, and famines, it will demand a powerful international authority. This authority should deal out the world’s food to the various nations in proportion to their population at the time of the establishment of the authority. If any nation subsequently increased its population it should not on that account receive any more food. The motive for not increasing population would therefore be very compelling. What method of preventing an increase might be preferred should be left to each state to decide.” [emphasis mine] – 124

Eugenics and Dysgenics – The Scientific Breeding of Humans

“biology, physiology and psychology are likely in the long run to affect human life quite as much as physics and chemistry.” [emphasis mine] – 38

“In any case, it is pretty certain that scientific technique will very soon effect great improvements in the animals and plants that are useful to man.

When such methods of modifying the congenital character of animals and plants have been pursued long enough to make their success obvious, it is probable that there will be a powerful movement for applying scientific methods to human propagation. There would at first be strong religious and emotional obstacles to the adoption of such a policy. But suppose (say) Russia were able to overcome these obstacles and to breed a race stronger, more intelligent, and more resistant to disease than any race of men that has hitherto existed, and suppose the other nations perceived that unless they followed suit they would be defeated in war, then either the other nations would voluntarily forgo their prejudices, or, after defeat, they would be compelled to forgo them. Any scientific technique, however beastly, is bound to spread if it is useful in war – until such time as men decide that they have had enough of war and will henceforth live in peace. As that day does seem to be at hand, scientific breeding of human beings must be expected to come about.” [emphasis mine] – 39

“Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy. It may be worthwhile to spend a few moments in speculating as to possible future developments of those that are oligarchies.

…Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so.

A totalitarian government with a scientific bent might do things that to us would seem horrifying. The Nazis were more scientific than the present rulers of Russia, and were more inclined towards the sort of atrocities that I have in mind. They were said – I do not know with what truth – to use prisoners in concentration camps as material for all kinds of experiments, some involving death after much pain. If they had survived, they would probably have soon taken to scientific breeding. Any nation which adopts this practice will, within a generation, secure great military advantages. The system, one may surmise, will be something like this: except possibly in the governing aristocracy, all but 5 per cent of males and 30 per cent of females will be sterilised. The 30 per cent of females will be expected to spend the years from eighteen to forty in reproduction, in order to secure adequate cannon fodder. As a rule, artificial insemination will be preferred to the natural method. The unsterilised, if they desire the pleasures of love, will usually have to seek them with sterilised partners.

Sires will be chosen for various qualities, some for muscle others for brains. All will have to be healthy, and unless they are to be the fathers of oligarchs they will have to be of a submissive and docile disposition. Children will, as in Plato’s Republic, be taken from their mothers and reared by professional nurses. Gradually, by selective breeding the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organised insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton. (The Aztecs kept a domesticated alien tribe for purposes of cannibalism. Their regime was totalitarian.)

To those accustomed to this system, the family as we know it would seem as queer as the tribal and totem organisation of Australian aborigines seems to us… The labouring class would have such long hours of work and so little to eat that their desires would hardly extend beyond sleep and food. The upper class, being deprived of the softer pleasures both by the abolition of the family and by the supreme duty of devotion to the State, would acquire the mentality of ascetics: they would care only for power, and in pursuit of it would not shrink from cruelty. By the practice of cruelty men would become hardened, so that worse and worse tortures would be required to give the spectators a thrill.” [emphasis mine] – 61

Conclusion

A very important auxiliary technique involved in creating the “submissive and docile disposition” is education. Bertrand Russell’s views on education will be discussed in the following article, entitled Mass Psychology and Education.

Mass Psychology and Education
The Impact of Science on Society Part 4

Brent Jessop – Knowledge Driven Revolution.com
February 4, 2008

“For some reason which I have failed to understand, many people like the system [scientific totalitarianism] when it is Russian but disliked the very same system when it was German. I am compelled to think that this is due to the power of labels; these people like whatever is labelled ‘Left’ without examining whether the label has any justification.”- Bertrand Russell, 1952 (p56)

What exactly is the purpose of education? Does the government want to teach young people how to think and reason for themselves or is it a form of mass psychology aimed at propagandising the young? These questions are examined through Bertrand Russell’s 1952 book entitled The Impact of Science on Society*.

Bertrand Arthur William Russell, 3rd Earl Russell (1872-1970) was a renowned British philosopher and mathematician who was an adamant internationalist and worked extensively on the education of young children. He was the founder of the Pugwash movement which used the spectre of Cold War nuclear annihilation to push for world government. Among many other prizes, Russell was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1950 and UNESCO’s (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization) Kalinga prize in 1957.

Part 1 of this series examines the impact of “scientific technique” on society. The second part explores Bertrand Russell’s views on the stability of a worldwide scientific society. Part 3 deals with population control and the scientific breeding of humans.

Education, a Modern Method of Propaganda

From Bertrand Russell’s The Impact of Science on Society:

“I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is mass psychology. Mass psychology is, scientifically speaking, not a very advanced study… This study is immensely useful to practical men, whether they wish to become rich or to acquire the government. It is, of course, as a science, founded upon individual psychology, but hitherto it has employed rule-of-thumb methods which were based upon a kind of intuitive common sense. Its importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Of these the most influential is what is called ‘education’. Religion plays a part, though a diminishing one; the Press, the cinema and the radio play an increasing part.

What is essential in mass psychology is the art of persuasion. If you compare a speech of Hitler’s with a speech of (say) Edmund Burke, you will see what strides have been made in the art since the eighteenth century. What went wrong formerly was that people had read in books that man is a rational animal, and framed their arguments on this hypothesis. We now know that limelight and a brass band do more to persuade than can be done by the most elegant train of syllogisms. It may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the State with money and equipment.

This subject will make great strides when it is taken up by scientists under a scientific dictatorship. Anaxagoras maintained that snow is black, but no one believed him. The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakeable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at. First, that the influence of home is obstructive. Second, that not much can be done unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten. Third, that verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective. Fourth, that the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity. But I anticipate. It is for future scientists to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black, and how much less it would cost to make them believe it is dark grey.” [emphasis mine] – 40

The Intended Result of Education

“The completeness of the resulting control over opinion depends in various ways upon scientific technique. Where all children go to school, and all schools are controlled by the government, the authorities can close the minds of the young to everything contrary to official orthodoxy. Printing is impossible without paper, and all paper belongs to the State. Broadcasting and the cinema are equally public monopolies. The only remaining possibility of unauthorised propaganda is by secret whispers from one individual to another. But this, in turn, is rendered appallingly dangerous by improvements in the art of spying. Children at school are taught that it is their duty to denounce their parents if they allow themselves subversive utterances in the bosom of the family. No one can be sure that a man who seems to be his dearest friend will not denounce him to the police; the man may himself have been in some trouble, and may know that if he is not efficient as a spy his wife and children will suffer. All this is not imaginary, it is daily and hourly reality. Nor, given oligarchy, is there the slightest reason to expect anything else.” [emphasis mine] – 58

“Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy. It may be worthwhile to spend a few moments in speculating as to possible future developments of those that are oligarchies.

It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fichte laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. But in his day this was an unattainable ideal: what he regarded as the best system in existence produced Karl Marx. In future such failures are not likely to occur where there is dictatorship. Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so.” [emphasis mine] – 61

That is really worth repeating.

“Diet, injections, and injunctions [a command, admonition, etc.] will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible.”

Some Miscellaneous Uses of Education

“…result from the elimination of war [and the establishment of a world government]. A great deal, also, is to be hoped from a change in propaganda. Nationalist propaganda, in any violent form, will have to be illegal, and children in schools will not be taught to hate and despise foreign nations. Active instruction in the evils of the old times and the advantages of the new system would do the rest. I am convinced that only a few psychopaths would wish to return to the daily dread of radioactive disintegration.” – 108

“The nations which at present increase [their populations] rapidly should be encouraged to adopt the methods by which, in the West, the increase of population has been checked. Educational propaganda, with government help, could achieve this result in a generation.” [emphasis mine] – 116

The idea of using education or rather sex education to reduce the population of the west was further promoted in 1968 by Paul Ehrlich in his book The Population Bomb**:

“We need a federal law requiring sex education in schools – sex education that includes discussion of the need for regulating the birth rate and of the techniques of birth control. Such education should begin at the earliest age recommended by those with professional competence in this area – certainly before junior high school.

By “sex education” I do not mean course focusing on hygiene or presenting a simple-minded “birds and bees” approach to human sexuality. The reproductive function of sex must be shown as just one of its functions, and one that must be carefully regulated in relation to the needs of the individual and society.” – 133

For more on Paul Ehrlich’s views on the use of education and other means of population control please read this previous article, Population, Religion and Sex Education.

The Governing Classes Only

Most people reading this article are the products of a state run educational system. If the above is not enough to make you reflect on the merits of universal education and on all of the things you were ‘taught’ as a child (and since then), hopefully the following quote will.

“Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen…” [emphasis mine] – 41

*Quotes from Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society (1952). ISBN0-415-10906-X
**Quotes from: Paul R. Ehrlich. The Population Bomb: Revised & Expanded Edition (1968, 1971). SBN 345-24489-3-150.

Building the World State. From World Governance to World Government

Building the World State IX.

From World Governance to World Government: The Greatest Conspiracy in History Unmasks
from EURO-MED.DK

“We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” — Statement made before the United States Senate on Feb. 7, 1950 by James Paul Warburg “Angel to and active in the United World Federalists), son of Paul Moritz Warburg, nephew of Felix Warburg and of Jacob Schiff, both of Kuhn, Loeb & Co, which poured millions into the Russian Revolution through James’ brother Max, banker to the German government “
Even Gordon Brown and Pope Benedict XI are calling for “global solutions to global problems” – a phrase previously used by Tony Blair. And they are being backed by former UN Secretary-General, Boutros Boutros-Ghali

As described by the Financial Times world government is coming , here

Campaign conference reiterates call for UNPA as step to World Parliament
26 November 2007: Parliamentarians, representatives of non-governmental organizations and other activists of the Campaign for a UN Parliamentary Assembly (UNPA) from 18 countries gathered in the UN‘s “Palais des Nations” in Geneva last week for an exchange on the UNPA concept and the Campaign strategy. The meeting reiterated the principles laid down in the „Appeal for the establishment of a Parliamentary Assembly at the UN“, such as the gradual approach which allows first steps beneath the threshold of UN Charter reform. It was also stressed, however, that at the same time the eventual goal of a world parliament should be communicated. While some questions were vividly debated, the meeting also concluded, among other things, that a UNPA should be open for participation of regional parliamentary assemblies and should offer innovative ways for strong NGO participation. It was agreed that the goal to establish a UNPA-Coalition should be pursued with a series of preparatory conferences rather with one single event. Host of the conference was the Society for Threatened Peoples-International .

Who is behind the call for this World Parliament
Febr. 1994 : A resolution of the European Parliament on “the role of the United Nations within the UN and the problems of reforming the UN” contains a paragraph saying that it “wishes consideration to be given to the possibility of setting up within the UN a parliamentary consultative assembly to enable the elected representatives of peoples to participate more fully in the work of UN bodies”.

January 2004: The European Parliament reiterates its support for a UNPA by stating in a resolution on “the relations between the European Union and the United Nations… jointly launching, in cooperation with regional or world Parliamentary Assemblies … a network of parliamentarians, which should meet on a regular basis in a Consultative Parliamentary Assembly under the United Nations, to discuss major political issues”.

June 2005: In a resolution “on the reform of the United Nations” the European Parliament once again supports the establishment of a UNPA.

January 2006: The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe “urges Council of Europe member and observer states … to setting up a UN parliamentary assembly, based on national delegations, with consultative functions for the General Assembly”.

March 1996: The Secretary-General of the World Federation of United Nations Associations, Erskine Childers, states: ” We need a worldwide campaign to get our governments to establish, …a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly elected by the peoples”.

It is being backed by The “Millennium Forum” 2000, October 2003: The XXII. Congress of the Socialist International. November 2006: former UN Secretary-General Javier Pérez de Cuéllar April 2007: The international Campaign for the Establishment of a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly is launched. July 2007: In a report approved by the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development of the Canadian House of Commons , September 2007: In a statement issued by UBUNTU World Forum of Civil Society, 12 Dec. 2008: By The Latin American Parliament (Parlatino).
And many more

The Campaign for the Establishment of a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly
(UNPA) is a global network of parliamentarians and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) advocating citizen’s representation at the United Nations.
The Campaign’s participants are united in their support of the Appeal for the Establishment of a Parliamentary Assembly at the United Nations. The list of initial signatories to the appeal has been made public in April and May 2007 during the launch of the campaign at more than one dozen events on five continents. The call for a UNPA now is supported by 594 members of parliament, further 1932 individuals from 128 countries and 165 NGOs on all continents. The first international conference was convened in November 2007 in the Palais des Nations in Geneva under the patronage of former UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali.
The Campaign’s Secretariat is led by the Committee for a Democratic United Nations. The work of the Campaign is guided by an informal Steering Committee, which helps to define the Campaign’s goals, policies and strategies.

Appeal (excerpt)
We appeal to the United Nations and the governments of its member states to establish a Parliamentary Assembly at the United Nations. We call for all organizations, decision-makers and citizens engaged with the international common interest to support this appeal.

Humanity faces the task of ensuring the survival and well being of future generations as well as the preservation of the natural foundations of life on Earth. We are convinced that in order to cope with major challenges such as social disparity, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, the threat of terrorism or the endangerment of global ecosystems, all human beings must engage in collaborative efforts.
Such an assembly would not simply be a new institution; as the voice of citizens, the assembly would be the manifestation and vehicle of a changed consciousness and understanding of international politics. The assembly could become a political catalyst for further development of the international system and of international law. It could also substantially contribute to the United Nation’s capacity to realize its high objectives and to shape globalization positively.

Here, you can support the appeal.

Purpose of the UNPA
Parliamentary Assembly at the United Nations (UNPA) would serve to bring the voice of the citizens into the United Nations and international politics. Since the establishment of the Pan-African Parliament which is attached to the African Union, the United Nations by now is one of the last government organizations above the national level which does not have some sort of parliamentary representation.

Elected parliamentarians could act as direct representatives of civil society in global decision-making. The UNPA would be the body where these representatives gather and debate global issues. Initially the UNPA could consist of delegates of national and regional parliaments, reflecting their political composition. A UNPA therefore would include members of minority parties not included in government. At a later stage the UNPA could be directly elected. Thus, a UNPA would be a unique and legitimate body to represent the voice of citizens in international matters. The Campaign participants envisage that a UNPA, once established, would develop from a mere consultative body to a world parliament with genuine rights of information, participation and control.
As such a UNPA could be critical for an in-depth reform of the U.N. system.
It would be an additional means to integrate civil society at large more effectively into the shaping of globalization.

EUObserver, Jan. 9, 2008: Now the German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, joins the choir:
Alongside with Pres. Sarkozy, the chancellor said the world needs an “economic council” in the United Nations as well as the existing body that deals with security matters, adding that alongside the UN Charter, an economic sustainability charter “for a long-term reasonable economy” should be drafted establishing rules for global financial governance. “The crisis is an opportunity to create an international architecture of institutions. Former UK prime minister Tony Blair, a co-sponsor of the symposium, echoed the European leaders: “what is unavoidable in the longer term is a recasting of the system of international supervision.” (Financial Times New World Order video-Interview).

Comment
Which is to say: First create the great crisis – then make people believe we need world governance/government!
The UNPA Campaign is directed Andreas Bummel , who was – until recently a Council member of the World Federalist Movement – founded by illuminist James Paul Warburg´s United World Federalists.

As regular readers of this blog know this is exactly what I have written about for more than a year now: World Government. I have been trying to document the forces and many institutions behind this development – and stated it is not conspiracy theory as generally thought. This must have become specially obvious after the EU declared itself to be illuminist (explanatory statement). I cannot take the expression “conspiracy theory” for anything but a New World Order smoke screen for its high treason Anyway, here is the proof that we are not dealing with conspiracy theory – but with conspiracy practice.

As seen from the above this World Parliament – UNPA – is not a democratic one. It is to be a legislative government by NGOs who are just as bought as the politicians to run for lucrative seats in the UNPA. NGO-members are not elected by the people. They can be managed by all those who have money to let them pusue their fads. Islam and the New World Order will have their big opportunities here.

Left: Mayer Amschel Rothschild. Right: Nathan Rothschild

This is the goal of the illuminists founded by Mayer Amschel Rothschild and Adam Weishaupt on May 1, 1776: to create a world state governed by the means of the money of the House of Rothschild.
According to David Allen Rivera
“At the Congress of Vienna Fürst Metternich, a Rothschild ally launched a plan. In actuality, the reason for the Congress of Vienna, was for the Illuminati to create a Federation, so they would have complete political control over most of the civilized world. Many of the European governments were in debt to the Rothschilds, so they figured they could use that as a bargaining tool (Denmark, therefore, went bankrupt in 1813). The Illuminati, in their first attempt, had come terrifyingly close to gaining control of the world. It was prevented by Czar Alexander I of Russia.The head of the family, Nathan Rothschild, awaited the day that his family would get revenge by destroying the Czar and his family, which they did in 1917.

Rothschild is still working behind the stage by means of his money. His acolytes are behind the present financial crisis, as I have repeatedly shown on this blog.

Happy New World Order!


from euro-med.dk:

Building the World State IX. From World Governance to World Government: The Greatest Conspiracy in History Unmasks
Building the World State VIII. From Global Crisis to ”Global Government”: The Realization of the Albert Pike Legacy
Building the World State VII. New World Order Remapping the Middle East? A Spy Story
Building the World State VI. A Countdown to Upcoming Showdown: The Cold War Is Heating in the Middle East
Building the World Republic V: The Building Blocks
Building The World State IV. Religion Stonebreakers: Fabian Socialism. 4th ASEM Interfaith Dialogue
Building the World State III. Spiritual Fire or Cemetary Peace. The Christmas-Message of EU Parliament President, Hans-Gert Pöttering
Building the World State II: Sarkozy Will Enforce Hitler´s Ideas of Making a Master Race
Building the World State I. Amsterdam Mayor Job Cohen: Immigration and Multiculture Yardsticks of Success.

Demoralization, Destabilization, Insurgency, Normalization

This amazing interview was done back in 1985 with a former KGB agent who was trained in subversion techniques. He explains the 4 basic steps to socially engineering entire generations into thinking and behaving the way those in power want them to. It’s shocking because our nation has been transformed in the exact same way, and followed the exact same steps.


www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeMZGGQ0ERk




Interviewer, G. Edward Griffin: Our conversation is with Mister Yuri Alexandrovich Bezmenov. Mr. Bezmenov was born in 1939 in a suburb of Moscow. He was the son of a high ranking Soviet Army officer. He was educated in the elite schools inside the Soviet Union and became an expert in Indian culture and Indian languages. He had an outstanding career with Novesti, which was the, and still is, I should say, the Press arm or the press agency of the Soviet Union. It turns out that this is a front for the KGB. He escaped to the West in 1970 after becoming totally disgusted with the Soviet System. And he did this at great risk to his life. He is certainly one of the world’s experts on the subject of Soviet propaganda and disinformation and active measures.

When, the Soviets use the phrase ideological subversion what do they mean by it?

Yuri Bezmenov: Ideological subversion is, is the process which is legitimate, overt and open. You, you can see it with your own eyes. All, all you have to do, all American mass media has to do is to unplug their bananas from their ears, open up their eyes and they can see it. There is no mystery. There is nothing to do with espionage.

I know that espionage, intelligence gathering looks more romantic. It sells more deodorants through their advertising, probably. That’s why your Hollywood producers are so crazy about James Bond type, in free words.

But in reality, the main emphasis of the KGB is not in the area of intelligence at all. According to my opinion and the opinion of many defectors of my caliber only about fifteen percent of time, money, and manpower is spent on espionage as such. The other eighty-five percent is a slow process which we call either ideological subversion, or active measures, (~Activitia perionachia, in the language of the KGB), or psychological warfare. What it basically means is to change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that despite the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interests of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country. It’s a great brainwashing, process which goes very slow and is divided into four basic stages. The first one being demoralization.

It takes from fifteen to twenty years to demoralize a nation. Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years which requires to educate one generation of students in the country of, of your enemy exposed to the ideology of the enemy. In other words Marxist-Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of, of at least three generations of American students without being challenged or counter-balanced by the basic values of Americanism, American patriotism. …

Most of the activity of the Department was to compile huge amount, volume of information on individuals who were instrumental in creating public opinion, publishers, editors, journalists, actors, educationalists, professors of political science, members of Parliament, representatives of business circles. Most of these people were divided roughly in two groups, those that would tow the Soviet foreign policy. They would be promoted to the positions of power through media and public opinion manipulation. Those who refused the Soviet influence in their own country would be character assassinated or executed physically, counter-revolution.

Same way, as in the small town of Hue, in South Vietnam, several thousands of Vietnamese were executed in one night when city was captured by Vietcong for only two days. And American CIA could never figure out, how could possibly Communists know each individual, where he lives, where, where to get him and would be arrested in one night, basically, arrested four hours before dawn, put on a van, taken out of the city limits and shot? The answer is very simple. Long before Communists occupied city there was extensive network of informers, local Vietnamese citizens who knew absolutely everything about people who are instrumental in public opinion, including barbers and taxi drivers. Everyone who was sympathetic to United States was executed.

Same thing was done under the guidance of, of the Soviet Embassy in Hanoi. And same thing I was doing in New Delhi. To my horror, I discovered, that in the files were people who were doomed to execution. There were names of, of pro-Soviet journalists with whom I was personally friendly.

G. Edward Griffin : Pro-Soviet?

Yuri Bezmenov: Yes. They were idealistically-minded Leftists who made several visits to USSR and yet the KGB decided that counter-revolution or drastic changes in political structure in India, they would have to go.

G. Edward Griffin : Why is that?

Yuri Bezmenov: Because they know too much. Simply because, you see, the useful idiots, the Leftists who are idealistically believing in the beauty of Soviet socialist or Communist or whatever system when they get disillusioned, they become the worst enemies. That’s why my KGB instructors specifically made a point, never bother with Leftists. Forget about these political prostitutes. Aim higher. This was my instruction. Try to get into, into wide circulation, established conservative media. Reach the filthy rich movie makers, intellectuals, so-called academic circles, cynical, ego-centric people who can look into your eyes with an angelic expression and tell you a lie. These are the most recruit-able people. People who lack moral principles who are either too greedy or to suffer from self-importance, they feel that they matter a lot. These are the people who KGB wanted very much to recruit.

Interviewer, G. Edward Griffin: To eliminate the others to execute the others, don’t they serve some purpose? Wouldn’t they be the ones to rely on?

Yuri Bezmenov: They serve purpose only at the stage of destabilization of a nation. For example, your Leftists in the United States, all these professors and all these beautiful civil rights defender, they are instrumental in the process of subversion, only to destabilize the nation. When the job is completed they are none, they are not needed any more. They know too much. Some of them, when, when they see the Marxist-Leninists come to power, obviously, they get offended. They think that they will come to power. That will never happen, of course. They will be lined up against the wall and shot. But, they may turn into the most bitter enemies of Marxist-Leninism when they come to power. And that’s what happened in Nicaragua. You remember, most of the former Marxist-Leninist either were put to prison. And one of them split and now he’s working against the Sandinistas. It happened in Grenada, when Maurice Bishop, he was already a Marxist. He was executed by a new Marxist who was more Marxist than this Marxist. The same happened in Afghanistan. First there was Taraki. He was killed by Amin and Amin was killed by Brabak Karbakil with the help of the KGB. The same happened in Bangladesh when Mungi Burackman, the very pro-Soviet Leftist, was assassinated by his own Marxist-Leninist military comrades. It’s the same pattern everywhere. The moment they serve their purpose, all these useful idiots are used, either be executed entirely, or exiled or put in prison. Many former Marxists are in Cuba, are in prison.

So, basically, you in America are stuck with demoralization. And unless, even if you start right now, here this minute, educating a new generation of Americans, it will still take fifteen or twenty years to turn the tide of ideological perception of reality and normalcy and, and patriotism.

The result? The result you can see. Most of the people who graduated in the sixties, dropouts or half-baked intellectuals are now occupying the positions of power in the government, civil service, business, mass media, educational system. You are stuck with them. You cannot get rid of them. They are contaminated. They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern. You cannot change their mind even if, if you expose them to authentic information. Even if you prove that white is white and black is black. You cannot change the basic perception and illogical behavior. In other words, these people, the process of demoralization is complete and irreversible. To get rid society of these people you have, you need another twenty or, fifteen years to educate a new generation of patriotically-minded and, and common, common sense people who would be acting in favor and in the interests of United States society.

Interviewer, G. Edward Griffin: And yet these people who have been programmed and as you say, in-placed, …. Yuri Bezmenov: Yes. Interviewer, G. Edward Griffin: … who are favorable to an opening with the Soviet concept. These are the very people who would be marked for extermination?

Yuri Bezmenov: Most of them, yes. Simply because the psychological shock when, when they will see, the future, what the beautiful society of equality and social justice, means in practice. Obviously, they will revolt. They, they will be very unhappy, frustrated people. A Marxist-Leninist regime does not tolerate these people. They, obviously, they will join the leagues of dissenters, dissidents. Unlike in present United States, there will be no place for dissent in future Marxist-Leninist America. Here you can, you can get popular, like Daniel Ellsberg, or filthy rich, like Jane Fonda, for being dissident, for criticizing your Pentagon. In future these people will simply be, squich, squashed like cockroaches. Nobody is going to pay them nothing for their beautiful, noble ideas of equality. This they don’t understand. And, and will be greatest shock for them, of course.

The demoralization process in the United States is basically completed already. For the last thirty-five years. Actually, it is over-fulfilled because demoralization reaches such areas where previously, not even Comrade Andropov [1911-1984] and all his experts would, would even dream of such a tremendous success. Most of it is done by Americans to Americans thanks to lack of moral standards. As I mentioned before exposure to true information does not matter any more. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures. Even if I take him, by force, to the Soviet Union and show him concentration camp he will refuse to believe it until he, he is going to receive a kick in his, in his fat bottom. When the military boot crashes his, then he will understand. But not before that. That is the tragic of this situation of demoralization.

The next stage is destabilization. This time, the subverter does not care about your ideas, the patterns of your consumption, whether you eat junk food and get fat and flabby. It doesn’t matter anymore. This time, and it only takes from two to five years to destabilize a nation, what matters is essentials, economy, foreign relations, defense systems. And you can see it quite clearly in sensitive areas as defense and economy. The Marxist-Leninist ideas in the United States is absolutely fantastic. I could never have believed in fourteen years ago [1971] when I landed in this part of the world that the process would go that fast.

The next stage is crisis. If, if, it may take only six weeks to bring a country to the verge of crisis. You see it in Central America now. And after crisis, with a violent change in power, structure, and economy you have the period of so-called normalization will last indefinitely. Normalization is a cynical expression borrowed from Soviet propaganda. When the Soviet tanks moved into Czechoslovakia in ’68 Brezhnev said, ‘now brother Czechoslovakia is normalized.’ This is what will happen in the United States if you allow all these schmucks to promise all the goodies and paradise on earth to destabilize your economy, to eliminate the principle of free market competition, and to put a big brother government in Washington, D.C. with benevolent dictators like Walter Mondale who will promise lots of things, never mind if they are fulfilled or not. He will go to Moscow to kiss the bottoms of the new generation of Soviet assassins. Never mind. He will create false illusions that the situation is under control. Situation is not under control. Situation is disgustingly out of control.

Most politicians, media, and educational system frames another generation who think they are living at the peace time. False. The United States is in a state of war against the basic principles and the foundations of this system.

And the initiator of this war is not comrade Andropov of course. It’s the system. However ridiculous it may sound, the world Communist system, the world Communist conspiracy. Whether I scare some people or not, I don’t give a hoot. If, if you are not scared by now, nothing can scare you. But, you don’t have to be paranoid about it. What actually happens now, that unlike myself you have literally several years to live on unless the United States wake up. The time bomb is ticking. Every second the disaster is coming closer and closer. Unlike myself, you will have nowhere to defect to, unless you want to live in Antarctica with penguins. This is the last country of freedom and possibility.

G. Edward Griffin: OK, what do we do? What is your recommendation to the American people?

Yuri Bezmenov: The immediate thing that comes to my mind, of course, there must be an immediate, very strong national effort to educate people in the spirit of real patriotism, number one. Number two, explain the real danger of socialist, Communist, whatever welfare state, big brother government. If people will fail to grasp the impending danger of their development, nothing ever can help United States. You might kiss goodbye to your freedoms, including freedoms to homosexuals, prison inmates, all this freedom will vanish, evaporate in five seconds, including your precious life.

The second thing, the moment at least part of the United States is convinced that the danger is real, they have to force the American government, and I’m not talking about sending letters, signing petitions and all these beautiful noble activity. I’m talking about forcing the United States government to stop aiding Communist government.

Source: http://www.fhu.com “Wake up and Save Your Country.” The Foundation of Human Understanding. Roy Masters http://www.fhu.com/kgb-brainwashing-video.html No date. My transcript of a center portion, a 5 minute 8 second video interview excerpt of KGB defector, Yuri Bezmenov interviewed in 1984 by G. Edward Griffin. Transcript completed July 30, 2008 and posted on Newsvine.com.

A longer interview was found on 7-2-09, transcribed on 7-3-09, and proofed 7-4-09. Yuri Bezmenov interview, Longer version, 16:35, with French subtitles, uploaded 09/26/07: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x32cxf_yuri-bezmenov

and

Yuri Bezmenov, interviewé en 1985. Voir aussi http://www.bafweb.com/2007/09/26/yuri-bezmenov-les-idiots-utiles-du-socialisme/ on http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x32cxf_yuri-bezmenov found Thursday, July 2, 2009 10:59 AM PDT

http://larryh.newsvine.com/_news/2009/07/05/2998127-four-stages-in-subverting-a-nation-demoralization-destabilization-crisis-normalization-his-thesis-leftists-are-the-useful-idiots-of-socialism-

The Scientific Dictatorship and the Future of Humanity

We are at a critical juncture in history. A technological revolution is unfolding that is anticipated to alter humanity forever. We are witnessing the rise of tyrannical global governance and the fall of America. Elites around the world are keenly aware of the importance of the historical time we are living in.

They want to be masters of the future.

What will you do?

Daniel Taylor
www.oldthinkernews.com
Youtube

Your New World Central Bank and World Currency

- Taken Out of Rothschild´s Expensive CO2-free Air

by Anders euro-med.dk

Summary: The Rothschild think tank, the Chatham House, has presented its proposal for a world currency based on the International Monetary Union´s (IMF) Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) – not based on real values, but only set at a notional value arbitrarily conferred on them, probably to be based on allocated CO2 allowances. The IMF would accordingly become the world’s Central Bank and Treasury. Already the IMF can be regarded as a Rothschild subsidiary. The Chatham House suggests that the IMF’s head and the participating countries’ central bank governors, who are Rothschild-controlled, be given the task of controlling the world currency! The UNEP, the UNCTAD and the G20 have made the same proposal.
The IMF is to have the right to 1. issue the first supranational “currency” – i.e. paper money without any other backing than the good-will and guarantees of the IMF member states. 2. to survey currencies and deal with currency misalignments and promote monetary coordination. 3. to increase the use of SDRs and here, until it becomes the world currrency – in international trading. 4. Take national currencies at exchange rates, which the IMF fixes in return for – paper. 5. determining the wealth of nations by altering their exchange rates to the SDRs. 6. regulate the production of SDRs – thus regulating economical activity through inflation and deflation at the IMF´s liking. 7. In particular there needs to be a market-maker willing to buy and sell SDR bonds at bid/offer spreads that are competitive vis-à-vis those in existing bond markets – use as a unit of account and settlement for oil and other commodities (Let us guess: Rothschild, J.P. Morgan will assist). 8. Foster greater efforts in the peer monitoring and assessment of the full range of economic policies that impinge on countries’ balance of payments and exchange rates. 9. Strengthen the role and legitimacy of international institutions. 10. allowing it to issue its own quarterly reports on exchange rate and other relevant policies 11. The IMF would thereby become more vigorously engaged in ‘naming and shaming’.

The following is a report from March 2010 from the famous British elitist think tank The Chatham House. It summarizes what has been forwarded by the UN, G 20 and also by China: A New World Order with a world currency, viz. the Special Drawing Rights SDRs and here of the IMF.
It is also interesting, because it shows the thinking of the world government elite (according to EU Pres. van Rompuy, 2009 was the 1. year of global governance) : The IMF is to be a world central Bank, as the BIS has been till now.

2 fathers of the International Monetary Fund (IMF): Communist, Harry Dexter White, and John Maynard Keynes

Now let us see who is behind the IMF. It has joint world bank statistics with Rothschild´s BIS. The IMF cooperates with the BIS on financial stability ,and the IMF holds common conferences with the BIS on real estate and financial stability

The Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) is nothing but the Milner Group “writ large.” It was founded by the Group, has been consistently controlled by the Group, and to this day is the Milner Group in its widest aspect. It is the legitimate child of the Round Table organization also spawning the Council on Foreign Relations. The Round Table was the legitimate child of the “Closer Union” movement organized in South Africa in 1907

In his third will Cecil Rhodes left his entire estate to Freemason, Lord Nathan Rothschild as trustee. Rhodes stipulated that his gigantic fortune be used by his disciples to carry out the program he envisioned. Rothschild appointed Freemason Alfred Milner to head up the Secret society for which Rhodes’s first will made provision. Upon his appointment by Rothschild to chair Rhodes’s secret society, Milner recruited a group of young men from Oxford and Toynbee Hall to assist him in organizing his administration of the new society. All were respected English Freemasons. Among them were Rudyard Kipling, Arthur Balfour, Lord Rothschild, and some Oxford College graduates known as “Milner’s Kindergarten.” In 1909, Milner’s Kindergarten, with some other English Masons, founded the Round Table. The grandfather of all modern British Masonic “think tanks” was born.
Three powerful think tank offshoots of the Round Table are (1) the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), organized in 1919 in London; (2) the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), organized in 1921 in New York City; and (3) the Institute of Pacific Relations (IPR – dissolved 1960), organized in 1925 or the twelve countries holding territory in what today we call the Pacific Rim.

The Chatham House – or as it was called until 2004: The Royal Institute for International Affairs, has a long and sinister history

Executive Summary and Recommendations “Beyond the Dollar”
Rethinking the International Monetary System A Chatham House Report Edited by Paola Subacchi and John Driffill, Chatham House,
Chatham House and the ESRC World Economy and Finance Programme have looked at the current system, assessed the goals and principles that underpin it and made some recommendations for the way forward.

Dominique Strauss– Kahn is very much pleased with the New World Order plans to make his IMF the World´s Central Bank

This decade will certainly be one of transition. We do not expect a big bang, but a long, gradual process of incremental change and adjustment. However, whether this transition and the rebalancing of the world economy will be smooth remains to be seen.
As a result, the interests and requirements of the emerging economic powers should be taken into account. Policy cooperation should aim to avoid any protectionist reaction to exchange rate movements.

There is an argument for moving towards a multicurrency reserve system in line with the multipolar world, as well as expanding the use of a supranational currency such as the Special Drawing Right (SDR) (see Box 1). The policy recommendations below not only propose the measures that we regard as necessary but also take into account the political and economic costs involved in the transition from the current inadequately functioning system to a more sustainable and functional one.

A multicurrency reserve system for a multipolar world economy
1.1 Develop a multicurrency reserve system that is appropriate for a world of regional trading blocs – Europe, Asia, the Americas – alongside a still preeminent dollar. The disadvantage of losing network externalities would be compensated by gaining stability. Historical experience has shown that two or more reserve currencies can operate simultaneously.
1.2 Encourage a more extensive use of Special Drawing Rights as a supranational currency alongside international reserve currencies that are issued by sovereign states or by sovereign states pooled together in a currency union, as is the case
for the euro.
1.3 Promote cross-border dialogue and policy cooperation in order to manage the transition from a system based on the dollar to a multicurrency one. Institutional arrangements should be strengthened, with a clear mandate to avoid major imbalances.

2. Increase the use of the Special Drawing Rights
2.1 Expand the supply of SDRs in a frequent, predictable and politically independent way, so as to increase the existing stock at least in line with world GDP, gradually reducing the accumulation of dollars.
2.2 Establish a new committee (the ‘International Monetary Policy Committee’) to produce regular recommendations to the IMF board for new SDR allocations. The constitution of such a committee should be designed to ensure that its decisions are independent and fair. It might be chaired by the IMF managing director and composed of the heads of the central banks (All Rothschild´s minions) whose currencies make up the SDR, along with independent experts to allow independent decision-making on changes to the composition of the basket of currencies in the SDRs.
2.3 Establish a substitution account under the IMF into which member countries can deposit dollars, euros, yen or sterling, and receive the equivalent amount in SDRs in their account based on the exchange rate then prevailing. The size of this account should be limited initially and increased gradually, as experience is gained of its use by member countries and of the pattern of deposits and redemptions. Initially the substitution account might allow only one-way transfers, but it should work towards allowing both purchases and redemptions.
2.4 Take steps to increase the use of and demand for SDRs, beyond official circles, in international trade and finance:
2.4.1 The IMF should permit SDR accounts to be opened by private-sector actors.
2.4.2 The IMF or another suitable provider should create a settlement system, so that transactions denominated in SDRs can take place directly between buyers and sellers on a secure and transparentplatform.
2.4.3 The development of SDR-denominated financial instruments and markets in which to trade them should be encouraged. In particular there needs to be a market-maker willing to buy and sell SDR bonds at bid/offer spreads that are competitive vis-à-vis those in existing bond markets. These measures would greatly strengthen confidence in the liquidity of SDRs (i.e. their marketability, acceptability by all countries, convertibility to the dollar and other currencies, and use as a unit of account and settlement for oil and other commodities).

3. Promote dialogue and policy coordination to provide stability, confidence and balanced adjustment
3.1 Foster greater efforts in the peer monitoring and assessment of the full range of economic policies that impinge on countries’ balance of payments and exchange rates.
3.2 Encourage international dialogue between countries issuing a reference currency and individual or groups of countries using the reference currency. Consultation would pre-specify credible actions that would be taken in the case of growing imbalances and required change in reference currencies.

4. Strengthen the role and legitimacy of international institutions
4.1 Rebalance subscriptions to and voting rights within the IMF more rapidly and more radically than is currently taking place. These changes are needed to improve governance of, and increase international confidence in, the IMF. They are important in paving the way to wider use of SDRs. Without them the IMF risks becoming marginalized as an agent of a group of countries with a dwindling global presence. Following the reweighting of the voting rights, the composition of the Executive Board should also be rebalanced.
4.2 Strengthen the IMF’s ‘score-keeping’ capacity by allowing it to issue its own quarterly reports on exchange rate and other relevant policies. These would help in the evaluation of the full range of economic policies that affect exchange rates and the balance of payments, and establish a set of benchmarks against which countries’ actual policies and policy commitments could be assessed. The IMF would thereby become more vigorously engaged in ‘naming and shaming’. Both the management and the board must adjust the incentives for the staff to raise sensitive issues. IMF management, rather than the board, should have the authority to approve such surveillance reports, to further insulate the staff from political pressures.
4.3 Mandate the IMF to deal with currency misalignments and promote monetary coordination, or establish an institution for this purpose. Such an institution could start as a caucus of the countries issuing the reserve currencies – the United States, the Eurozone, the United Kingdom, Switzerland and Japan – and also include countries with the largest accumulation of reserves. This institution should eventually fulfil the function in terms of international monetary affairs that the World Trade Organization does for international trade.

The SDR is not a currency but a basket of currencies currently comprising the dollar, the Japanese yen, the euro and the pound sterling. The relative weights of these currencies are adjusted every five years. The next adjustment will take place in 2010. There have been only four allocations of SDRs made thus far. The last two allocations of 161.2 billion and 21.5 billion were made in August 2009 and September 2009 respectively. The total amount of SDRs is currently 204.1 billion.
These SDRs are distributed to the IMF member states in accordance with quotas that are largely decided by the size of their economy and its openness. The quota determines each member’s voting power in the IMF and its access to IMF funding as well as its financial obligations to the IMF. Wikipedia: “SDRs obtain their reserve asset power from the commitments of the IMF member states to hold and honor them for payment of balances”

Comment
Now, as stated above this is a summary of well-known suggestions from the UNEP and the technocrats. Their world currency consists of equal quotas of thin air (CO2) allocated to every person on earth. When you have used your allocation you go broke. You cannot make savings. Barroso 4. febr. 2010: The Copenhagen Accord might not be all that we hoped for. But it is a significant step on the road to a low carbon future. In the end, we will get there. No matter science, no matter the exposures of global warming science as fraud, The New World Order is building our future on thin air and lies. The devil is really at large in the NWO, for the NWO is his order.
Rothschild minion George Soros advocates SDRs as world currency, too. In April 2009 , Downing Street 10 affirmed on behalf of the G20 that the IMF was to be endowed with 250 bn dollars of new SDR allocations. This automatically means more inflation, i.e. theft of the value of our money. The remarkable thing is that the Master of the New World Order, The Rothschild Club, the Chatham House, comes into the open, stamping this one-world inititiative as its policy. That China, Russia and the Gulf states are dissatisfied with the dollar as the world´s only reserve currency and have started efforts to replace became clear last fall. The UNCTAD also wants a new world reserve currency, preferably the SDRs. So instead of gold standard, we are going to have a currency based on – nothing, except the New World order elite´s gracious grants to us subhumans. Did you believe, you could buy a little gold to secure yourself? Oh no. Your gold either consists of Tungsten covered with a thin layer of gold – or your gold certificate is just 1% worth its face value. Well, they are robbing you of your money, anyway, viz. as CO2 taxes.

from euro-med.dk:
Your New World Central Bank and World Currency – Taken Out of Rothschild´s Expensive CO2-free Air

Papandreou: We need global governance and we need it fast

April 28 2010

Sheeple: Signs That You Might Be Part Of The Herd

Giordano Bruno
The Silver Bear Cafe

Millions of people from countries across the world have begun to wake up to the very real threat of repressive and engineered Globalism, or what the financial elite and the politicians who work for them often refer to as “The New World Order”. The movement against this centralization of economic and social power has gained traction in nearly every sphere, to the point where even the mainstream media has been forced on occasion to acknowledge its existence and prevalence.

Those of us who have been working more than a few years in this activist organization, what many of us call the “Patriot Movement”, or the “Liberty Movement”, have seen incredible leaps and bounds in the fight against disinformation and the spread of unadulterated truth. Our work has gone viral, and our membership has skyrocketed, however, the task of diluting ignorance in the overall populace is far from over.

Every researcher, writer, and filmmaker who tackles the New World Order issue will suffer the unfortunate experience of running into people who are almost criminally uninformed, and this will happen on a regular basis. For a long time, our frustration was magnified by our inability to specifically define what it was that made these people the way they were. Were some just mentally inadequate, and unable to effectively process the facts? Were they so indoctrinated by the MSM that there was no turning back? Was there an innate difference in intuitive faculties that made some people quick in picking out a lie, and others slow? Many theories abound, but one thing was certain; in our quest to inform the masses, there were always going to be those who were incapable of hearing or understanding what we had to say, no matter how factual, rational, and refined our arguments. We now call these wonders of intellectual rustication “Sheeple”…

Sheeple can be found in every country, every ethnic background, every religious organization, and every subculture. After years of examination and experience, it has become much easier for the Liberty Movement to identify and categorize the various forms of sheeple, and come to terms with the triggers in the human mind that cause some to willfully ignore logic and wisdom. I have written in the past about some of these triggers, including my article “Sheeple: Why They Are The Way They Are”: http://neithercorp.us/npress/?p=182

I believe it is important to cover this issue once again, especially in light of recent attempts by the MSM, along with the ADL and SPLC, to demonize our movement and paint us as villainous cartoon characters in the minds of the general public, which will make things even more difficult for us in the near future if we are not prepared. For those in the movement, knowing when you are dealing with sheeple, why they function cognitively the way they do, and how you might be able to get around their mental blocks, is of utmost importance today. Every new person who is awakened to the abyss they are about to plunge into could tip the balance away from tyranny and establish a cultural foothold for free-thought. Every person counts. With the world on the edge of financial and political ruin due to the manipulations and mechanizations of elitism, we must work harder than ever before.

Identifying Sheeple

Not everyone who is unaware or uneducated on the intricacies of Globalism, Central Banking, and the NWO, is necessarily “sheeple”. All of us, at one time or another, were nearly clueless as to the real workings of our government and our economy behind the proverbial curtain. I have found that many people are quite open to the information I make available as long as I make it available in a way that is not immediately overwhelming for them, and as long as I present solid evidence to back every claim that I relate. It is very important to be able to make the distinction between those who are brazenly dim-witted, and those who simply have not been adequately exposed to the facts.

Below, I will list my observations on the various ‘types’ of sheeple, and how to recognize them. Keep in mind some people might fall into more than one category.

The ‘Happy-Go-Lucky’ Sheeple:

Also known as the “Yuppie”. Life is a party for these folks. As long as they are not affected by the immediate circumstances of the troubles surrounding them, they couldn’t care less about politics, economics, war, or governmental deceit. They may even be aware of the terrible facts behind a certain issue, but as long as the routine of their mundane existence remains intact, they will have little motivation to effect changes in their thinking or their world. In fact, some ‘Happy-Go-Lucky’ Sheeple ENJOY a random catastrophe or two, because it gives them conversational fodder for the small-talk around the water cooler that they love so much. Their primary drives are unchecked consumerism (the accumulation of useless things), and emotionally empty sexual exchanges (the accumulation of false self-confidence). Most of what they know about the world they derive from watching fifteen minutes of mainstream television news a day. They often parrot talking points they overheard on MSNBC or CNN, and rarely have an original thought.

I have found that these men and women are normally from upper middle-class, white collar families. They have likely been coddled and sheltered from the suffering that goes on outside of the affluent bubble they were born into, and have probably never had to truly struggle for anything in their lives, giving them an audacious sense of entitlement. Plenty of these people break out of this one track thinking pattern on their own. I have known quite a few. But others will refuse to see the obvious unless confronted with the prospect that they personally might lose something if they do not take action.

The ‘Quasi-Intellectual’ Sheeple:

My favorite kind of sheeple. These people hold themselves in very high esteem. Some even see themselves as part of the elite (though most of them are not). Normally from the “professional class”, they often hold positions as Doctors, Lawyers, Bankers, Investors, Professors, Scientists, etc, though some have not yet left the university setting, and are simply getting a head start on their superiority complex.

Quasi-Intellectual Sheeple believe in the world of academia as unerring, as opposed to true scholars, who always have the wisdom to question the conclusions of academia. To me, an Ivy League degree is little more than a $100,000 piece of paper; it tells me nothing of the true intelligence of the person holding it. One need only look at the thousands of mainstream “professional” financial analysts who blindly supported Keynesian economics and refused to acknowledge the bubbles being facilitated by the private Federal Reserve’s artificially low interest rates and free money mentality. Their expensive education counted for nothing, and the economy is now on a ruinous downward slide.

At bottom, most “higher education” is really indoctrination. People attaining degrees in economics learn what the financial establishment WANTS them to learn, and nothing more. The same goes for any other field of study in which information is extremely centralized and filtered. Yet, Quasi-Intellectual Sheeple have such misplaced faith in the ivory tower that they assume through the system they have reached the pinnacle of knowledge. Those who have not assimilated themselves into this system as the Quasi-Intellectual has are to be ignored or ridiculed when presenting an opposing view.

This type of sheeple is driven by the desire for respect, power, and sometimes sycophantic admiration. Actually being intelligent is less important to them than having others believe they are intelligent without question. When asked to prove their intelligence, they often respond with indignance. They rarely if ever consider the possibility that they may be wrong on any subject, especially if it’s a subject they received a degree in. When they find themselves facing someone who has a better grasp of an issue than they do, they will not relent. Instead, they will turn towards subversive debate tactics to confuse the discussion, go off on tangents to avoid direct confrontation, and when he is really cornered, he will throw out barrages of obscure vocabulary in an attempt to impress others and distract them from the fact that he has no idea what he is talking about.

Quasi-Intellectual Sheeple are easy to identify by their arrogant demeanor. They tend to distance themselves from FOX and CNN and read periodicals like Forbes and Foreign Affairs, which are still propaganda, just of a more complex nature. They respond to most arguments with a smile, due to overconfidence, until they realize they are being soundly outmatched, and then they tend to lose composure. It takes a lot of public embarrassment before they will mend their ways.

The ‘Working-Class Idiot’ Sheeple:

Otherwise known as “the good ole’ boy”. (Special Note: I came from a parallel background, and am highly familiar with these sheeple.) You would think that people who fancy themselves as hardcore conservatives would be aware of the push towards global government and the fact that groups like Al-Qaeda are a fairytale distraction away from the real threat: Socio-Corporate Elitism and overgrown Federal bureaucracy. Apparently, they would ‘love’ to hear about it, but the football game is on and their wife is in their ear and the rugrats won’t stop eating all the damn frosted flakes. Such is the life of men without valid priorities.

These folks are usually Neo-Conservative lapdogs, an ideology suspiciously identical to Socialism with a corporate twist. Mussolini had a name for this combination, though the term escapes me…

Its not that they LIKE big government, Socialism, and the loss of liberties, it’s just that they are too ignorant to realize that that’s what they are supporting when they support the current Republican Party. These sheeple are very competitive. Sadly, however, they are often not accomplished in much of anything, which forces them to live vicariously through the exploits of others; like sports teams, political figures, and soldiers sent to third world hell-holes to blow up “bad guys”. Winning, regardless of whether or not the fight is legitimate or justified, is at the top of the Working Class Idiot’s list.

They like to believe that they have a deep relationship with their conscience, which adds pain when attempting to explain anything to them. These men are vindicated in their own minds by a set of logical fallacies that would boggle the likes of Freud. Being rational is not important to those who are vehemently self righteous. They ARE the “good guys”, anyone who disagrees is a “bad guy”, and that is that. This mindset makes them very easy to dupe, and very easy to lead.

The Working Class Idiot worships television. More than a couple of days without it and he shivers like a starving drug addict. He watches FOX religiously, and not intelligent commentators like Andrew Napolitano. He’s a much bigger fan of frothing psychotics such as Bill O’ Reilly, spewing baseless nonsense like a third grader’s baking soda volcano spews foam. When cornered in an argument, this type of sheeple will try every trick he knows to degrade or intimidate his opponent. When that does not work, he has no problem resorting to violence. How to get through to this sheeple? Find a sports figure, prominent Republican, or military man who talks openly about the NWO (there are some out there). Only then will he take the blinders off.

The ‘New Age’ Sheeple:

Otherwise known as “unabashed collectivists”. Not to be confused with people who do legitimate study into mythology, spiritualism, and the teachings of the ancient past. These are the folks who read Oprah throwaway books like “The Secret”, and think they have actually learned a secret.

You don’t have to walk on egg shells with New Age Sheeple when it comes to the NWO. They are just as likely to approach you about it. The problem is, they think it’s the best thing since patchouli sticks! Why? Because their vision of a one world order comes from an overexposure to Gene Rodenberry-esque fantasy and a subversive form of propaganda I like to call “Positivism”.

Most ‘New Agers’ are people who have at one point or another in their lives met with serious struggle, unlike the ‘Happy-Go-Lucky’ sheeple. However, instead of holding steady through this struggle, they gave up, curling into a ball never to put any real effort into anything substantial again. They often make elaborate excuses for themselves, and adopt Eastern philosophical concepts they don’t really understand. Zen becomes an excuse to ignore the rest of the world and focus on something pointless like underwater basket weaving. Karma becomes an excuse and vindication for any unfortunate event. Self awareness gets confused with self-centeredness. While Happy-Go-Lucky sheeple focus superficially on the outside world, New Agers focus superficially on their inner world.

New Age Sheeple do not set out to actively and physically fix problems. They follow the Positivist view, which is to ignore bad things and hope they go away, or make them go away “with their minds”. No, I am not joking. Every New Ager I have ever met holds stubbornly to the belief that if they think happy thoughts and wish hard enough, their invisible “mental energy” will change their surroundings for them. “If only everyone was blindly optimistic about everything,” they think to themselves, “our society would be perfect…” I hate to break it to them, but no amount of ‘happy vibes’ will stop an inflationary dollar implosion, or stop people who have deliberately chosen to ignore their consciences from doing terrible things.

I have spent over two decades in the martial arts, so I am well aware of the mental and spiritual energy idea. However, in the martial arts, you are taught (rightly I think) that priming ones inner focus only prepares you for struggle, it does not make struggle disappear. What the New Age really boils down to is an attempt to cut corners and slap together easy answers for the very complex and intricate problems of life. It is a lazy man’s methodology of denial in which there is no concrete reality, only “point of view”. This breeds hive-mindedness, because the search for individualism is in itself an exhausting marathon, one they would rather not undertake. Overt collectivism is much easier. All you have to do is follow the swarm. And because New Agers force themselves to become so mutable, over the years they will mindlessly adapt to any horrifying circumstance. If reality is only a “point of view”, then why not rationalize wars and holocausts as illusory blips in time?

The only way to get through to New Age Sheeple that I have found is to show them succinctly that the New World Order the Global Elites are constructing is not the same as the one they like to imagine. Making them read through UN white papers on global governance and federal documents like PDD 51 and the Civilian Inmate Labor Program can help. They will still probably think a one world government is a good idea, but at least they won’t support the Elite’s version.

The ‘Quasi-Activist’ Sheeple:

Also known as “the rebel with too many causes and not enough knowledge”. At least these sheeple are willing to leave their houses and fight for something, even if they know little to nothing about what they are fighting for or over. The problem is that their lack of insight and in-depth understanding on most issues makes them highly susceptible to manipulation. These are the “useful idiots” we hear so much about; the people who support Anarchist groups that promote Socialist ideals (uh, Socialism is contrary to the tenets of real Anarchism, guys…), the people who believe everything they are told by the CRU on global warming even though the CRU has never released original source data proving that anything they say is true, the people who blame Capitalism and free markets for the economic collapse even though we haven’t had legitimate Capitalism and free markets in over a century. Without knowing the facts behind these issues, how can one effectively involve himself in them?

Quasi-Activist Sheeple protest not so much to change the world, but to FEEL like they are changing the world. Being a part of something greater, even if it’s a sham, is a major motivator. These people are under the impression that they have an inside track on the workings of politics and culture, but the information sources they use are ultimately narrow and biased. NPR for example is not a reliable news source, and just because they speak in a monotone voice with a British accent does not mean they are educated on social undercurrents or that they are objective. Most “progressive” journalism is merely the leftist equivalent of FOX; highly saturated with disinformation and emotional button pushing. This helps to create a subculture that sees itself as “alternative”, when it is actually the flipside of the same old false paradigm coin.

The advantage of dealing with Quasi-Activists is that they do realize something is very wrong with the world. This is more than most other sheeple accomplish in an entire lifetime. The key is showing them the inaccuracy of the information sources they are too dependent on, and breaking them out of the fake left/right mental trap. As long as they continue to blame all the problems of the planet on “the right”, as long as they continue to blame generalized and fictitious opponents that were designed for them by the media, they will never understand why America continues on its self-destructive path despite all their civil discourse.

Common Sheeple Arguments

Below are listed some of the most often uttered sheeple arguments, as well as the rational responses to them.

1) The NWO is just a “conspiracy theory”:

Set aside the fact that politicians and leaders of finance talk about the New World Order constantly in speeches, books, and on nighttime television. The temptation here is to push the sheeple label and start a battle of insults. When someone accuses you of “conspiracy theory” what they are really saying is that you are a liar, crazy, or both. Of course, calling someone a liar or crazy does not negate their arguments. Hollow character attacks like this are meant to interfere or defuse legitimate and logical discussion. Force the sheeple to address the information you present instead of allowing them to make your personal character the subject of the debate. This rule goes for you too. Don’t just call them sheeple without backing up your claims and pointing out the inconsistencies in their beliefs.

2) I’m well informed and have never been a “sheep”:

Most human beings, regardless of the time they live in, think they have it all figured out. Even men in the dark ages thought they had reached the summit of understanding. They are able to perpetuate this illusion because they are rarely challenged to prove the accuracy of their information or the wisdom in their perspective. Challenge their knowledge on specific issues, and show them there is always more to learn.

3) I’m not the “sheeple”! You are because you believe in conspiracy theories:

Yes, full grown adults still use the rubber/glue tactic. Remember, one of the main threads linking all sheeple is that they believe what they believe so that they can belong, so that they can be a part of a majority. Delving into NWO research is the last thing anyone does to “fit in”. Just mentioning it can alienate friends, family, potential hot dates, etc. No one follows this information because they expect to feel accepted by the masses. They follow it because they know it is the truth.

4) The NWO is not possible because it would involve too many people. Someone would let the cat out of the bag eventually:

Actually, the Global Elites themselves let “the cat out of the bag” constantly. They speak openly about plans for world government, world financial control, population control and reduction, and they write bills and legislation that are designed to limit or erase our civil liberties. The proof is hidden in plain sight.

5) You’re connecting dots that are not there:

Neither I nor any other researcher needs to “connect dots” when we have the public admissions and documents of the Elites themselves.

6) You’re just fear mongering to get attention:

The term “fear mongering” denotes the use of lies to induce hysteria. If the information we present is true and supported by tangible facts, then how other people are affected by it is not our problem, it is theirs. Frankly, learning the truth should make a person feel empowered, not hysterical.

7) Everything is just chaos. There is no such thing as an organized conspiracy to control the world:

The events they see as chaos make perfect sense to us because we have an insight into information they do not. It’s that simple. The numerous movements in a complex time-piece might seem like chaos to someone that doesn’t know what a time-piece is, or the purpose of a gear, or second hand. Try to explain the concept of color to a blind person. Without a full accounting of the facts, it is very hard for one to know a thing. Also, a quick glance through any encyclopedia, even those with heavy editing, will reveal numerous “conspiracies” throughout history by small groups of men to rule the known world at the expense of the rest of us. Why was it perfectly plausible a hundred years ago, or fifty years ago, but not today?

8) Yeah, I know the NWO exists, but who cares! We can’t stop it, so just live your life and have fun while you can:

Nihilism is the worst kind of mental illness because it allows a person to constantly fulfill his own prophecies by doing nothing. When it comes to cultural progression, there is no such thing as the insurmountable scenario. Anything can be accomplished with the right amount of intelligence and effort. Nihilists make no effort to fix the problems they are confronted with, then claim they were right to be nihilistic because nothing changed. We have a responsibility not just to ourselves, but to the future. We have a responsibility to deal with the problems of the present, instead of pawning them off on the next generation.

9) Its all our fault that Globalists get away with murder. Most of us are just stupid:

This is only partly true. The average person does share part of the blame for not educating himself on circumstances, and for not taking action, however, ultimately it is the Elites who initiate the crimes we are then forced to either face or ignore. They are the ones that literally spend billions of dollars on propaganda designed to keep us in a fog. In the end, it is they who carry the principal culpability, not “the people”.

10) What’s so bad about a one-world government? It would be the end of war, right?:

Global government designed around a collectivist structure and ruled by men who believe themselves to be “genetically and philosophically superior” to the rest of us would not fix anything, it would only make our current problems much worse. War would be perpetual, because there will always be people who fight to be free from despotism, and even planetary governments need to create fear to manipulate the citizenry towards certain goals. Our economy would be equalized; meaning it would be equally oppressive and feudalistic for everyone. And, the liberties we hold dear today would be a distant memory tomorrow. Anyone who truly thinks that more government makes them “safer” is not just extraordinarily naive; they are sheeple…

Breaking The Sheeple Barrier

Sheeple can change. I have seen it with my own eyes on numerous occasions. If the sheeple you are dealing with at any given moment is a stranger, or mere acquaintance, you may not feel that it is worth the immense effort necessary to enlighten them to the problems at hand. But, if said sheeple is a family member or loved one, you might have no other choice but to push forward. There is nothing worse than seeing the people you care about suffer because you were unsuccessful in warning them of impending danger.

The above sections can help in easing through the process of waking up a member of the herd, though the best efforts will be wasted without patience and persistence. In every person there are barriers and doorways to truth. The trick is finding the unique keys which open those doors and break down those barriers. There are some who will claim that it is futile to make the attempt. That we should leave well enough alone. That many are too far gone to be helped. I beg to differ. If that was true, then the Liberty Movement would not be making the tremendous strides it is today. We did not get to where we are now by giving up when the waters became choppy, and I believe when this age is chronicled and spoken of, it will be our perseverance above all else that defines us. It is a grueling task to defeat an opponent who cannot be dissuaded, who cannot be made to give up. It is nearly impossible to defeat that same opponent when he is also right. To those in the New World Order, we are such an opponent. As long as we do not falter, the sheeple will grow thinner in number, replaced by cognizant vibrant individuals, and the warped ambitions of Globalists will not come to pass…

from: The Silver Bear Cafe

Sheeple: Why They Are The Way They Are…

By Giordano Bruno

Neithercorp Press

For years, perhaps even decades, the Liberty Movement or elements of it have been waging a relentless and arduous battle; a painful and sometimes demoralizing struggle with no end in sight. This battle has consumed some people’s lives with few victories to speak of, making them bitter and indifferent to the fate of their fellow man. I speak not of our fight with Global Elites bent on centralized control of every country in the world, but of our fight with the average know-nothing American; our next door neighbor, our fellow employees on the job, even our own family members. The very same people we have recently come to term “Sheeple.”

Part Of The Herd

For people in the Liberty Movement who are privy to so much background knowledge of world events, it is often tempting to immediately label those people who have not yet been exposed to the facts as “Sheeple,” but this is not always the case. At one point or another, every one of us in the movement were completely unaware of the big picture, or had only a very vague impression of what Globalists were and how they manipulate the political and financial underpinnings of our society. Were we also Sheeple? If not, then what set us apart from others who did not take the initiative to learn more?

The fact is, it takes more than simply “not knowing” to be a part of the herd. It takes a special kind of willful ignorance.

When members of the Liberty Movement were first confronted with the reality of the “New World Order” (termed by global elitists, not us), we perhaps scoffed at first, but our intuition told us to look deeper, and we listened. Sheeple, on the other hand, are people who are confronted with the truth consistently, perhaps even daily, yet make the internal decision to ignore it, to block it out completely, to consciously make the decision that they will not even consider the possibility of the information’s validity. In psychology this level of denial is often associated with mild to very severe forms of mental illness, and in a sense, that’s exactly what Sheeple suffer from. Let’s examine further…

Did You Build Your Own World View, Or Was It Made For You?

Do you actively participate in the expansion of your own world view, or do you just parrot the talking points you hear on your favorite television news channel? Take honest note of what opinions you express and how you express them. How often do you repeat word for word what you hear from others? How often do you say only what you think other people want to hear? How often do you actually formulate your own conclusions on a subject based on facts you researched for yourself, instead of heard from someone else?

The problem is that many American’s are barely involved in the making of their own perspective, and this reflects a complete lack of interest in their own self awareness. In order to create one’s own world view, one must take interest in himself. This sounds vain, but taking interest in ones self also includes one’s failings and weaknesses; a frightening prospect for some people. Many decide that the pursuit of self knowledge is either too much work, or too painful to face, and instead choose the “path of least resistance,” become apathetic, and allow their environment to tell them who they are and what they believe. This creates a level of suggestivity akin to hypnosis, and the results on a mass scale can be horrifying. In a society of apathy, whoever controls the expressed world view of the general environment controls the world view of the people in it. The Mainstream Media accomplishes this task spectacularly.

World view is a powerful psychological force. When it is allowed to set in stone, it can make a person wildly blind to the obvious. They could be confronted with the most irrefutable of facts, but if these facts lay too far outside their established opinion, their minds seize, as if mustering against invasion. Reactions can become visibly absurd, or even violent. When the presentation of solid information without malicious intent causes a person to actually feel physically threatened to the point of unchecked rage or clownish indignance, something in their psyche is highly imbalanced. Yet, society often treats this way of dealing with information as almost “normal”…

Positivism: Playing Hopscotch On The Way To Oblivion

Another mass producer of sheep-like people is a movement that is incredibly pervasive in recent decades yet rarely identified or subjected to honest examination. It goes by many names but I often refer to it as the “positivist movement.” Positivism* is touted by hundreds of self help gurus, personal finance advisers, health and diet yogis, and even politicians (Barack Obama). It is actually a twisted branch of the New Age Movement that sprang from the strange and spiritually awkward recesses of the Theosophical Society (an elitist organization). The Theosophists stole the idea from Zen Buddhism, and horribly misinterpreted it for Western audiences. A more visible outcropping of this system can be seen in the UN recognized religion of “Bahai” (also an elitist supported organization):

Its basic driving force is the belief that “positivity” is not only a psychological state, but a world view with sociological implications, upon which, a successful and meaningful life is built. Negative environmental situations were considered a “matter of perspective,” and thus subject to our state of mind. That is to say, positivists believe that if a bad situation exists in your life, instead of trying to fix it, you should “change how you look at it”. Obviously, this would not work so well for an Afghan family facing a predator drone bombing, or a Holocaust victim in an internment camp. Changing one’s “perspective” alone does very little to help the abhorrent nature of the situation. Whenever I hear the argument for Positivism, I think of the final scene in Monty Python’s “Life of Brian,” when the hero is nailed to a wooden cross while other victims sing “Always Look On The Bright Side Of Life”.

The problem with Positivism is its assumption that there is no “ideal state,” that there is no point of balance, because we make everything up as we go along. This comes from the theory of the “Blank Slate” (long proven incorrect), which says that human beings are born devoid of any inherent knowledge or faculties. If we are blank slates, they argue, then there is no such thing as a “bad situation,” because we have no point of reference to judge whether something is bad or good. Therefore, they claim, all environmental situations are subject to your “perspective,” and as long as you believe a situation is “good” or “not negative,” then it will be so.

The psychologist Carl Jung proved beyond a doubt that the blank slate theory was absolutely inapplicable through his work on Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. He found that indeed there are many inherent psychological values and properties given to us at our very birth. These qualities included the capability for good (balanced), and evil (aberrant) behavior, as well as conscience, which helps us to determine which is which. Where these psychological properties come from is not yet known, but the fact remains that they exist. Because we have inborn oppositions (called “dualities”) in our psyches at birth, this means that there is a “point of reference” for positive and negative situations in our environment. When the reality of this is understood, the entire philosophy of Positivism comes crashing down.

Jung laughed and sometimes despaired at the ridiculous mish mash of philosophies the Theosophical Society threw together and marketed as their own “ancient wisdom”:

“I am convinced that the growing impoverishment of symbols has a meaning. It is a development that has an inner consistency. Everything that we have not thought about, and that has therefore been deprived of a meaningful connection with our developing consciousness, has got lost. If we now try to cover our nakedness with the gorgeous trappings of the East, as the Theosophists do, we would be playing our own history false. A man does not sink down to beggary only to pose afterwards as an Indian potentate. It seems to me that it would be far better stoutly to avow our spiritual poverty, our symbol-lessness (*of Western Culture*), instead of feigning a legacy to which we are not the legitimate heirs at all.”

Carl Jung, Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious

What Jung is saying here is, the Theosophists, and the New Agers, have stolen belief systems from other cultures that their groups simply do not have the capacity to understand or relate to, and then applied them to our own culture in a slapdash manner. This is how we get strange movements like Positivism, which purports that we are all “blank slates” and there is no “right and wrong” yet at the same time argues that there is such a thing as Karma, and the collective unconscious, that we Realists ruin with our “negative vibes.” The beliefs are completely contradictory, yet in the mind of a Positivist, it is the ultimate wisdom.

The danger of Positivism is its ability to make people apathetic to tyranny and prone to Collectivism, or rejection of the individual. If tyranny is just a “perspective” which you can change simply by adapting how you relate to it, then why fight it? The terror of freedom-lessness is all in our minds….right?

The opposite of this would be the Realist’s position; that there are in fact many imbalances in the world as determined by our conscience, which is inborn. That we should never fail in pointing out these imbalances, regardless of whether or not this seems negative to positivists, so that we may then do something about them. We do not bow to the environment that others create for us. If it does not support the ideals of justice, honor, and truth, then it must be changed, not us.

The mistake often made by positivists is their accusation that by focusing on the negative in the world, Realists promote pessimism. However, pointing out what is wrong with society and the world is only pessimistic if you believe nothing can be done about it, which is actually what positivists believe. Realists know that something can be done about it. Ironically, if anyone has a nihilistic view of the world, it is the positivist, who thinks he can do nothing about his circumstances, and hopes against hope that his forced smiles and fabricated joy will somehow help him ignore his dire situation.

The Idiocy Of “Intellectuals”

In the documentary “Manufacturing Consent,” Noam Chomsky talks about the “Professional Class,” the top 10% of educated people in the U.S., and how they are the most indoctrinated of all classes. He said that the establishment used the Graduate and Ivy League School apparatus as a sort of brainwashing laboratory, in which doctors, lawyers, and scientists, would be force-fed a carefully prepared diet of elitist propaganda which they would accept without question as un-erring truth. They would exit their studies believing themselves keepers of the historical direction of our age, and far superior in intellect to those not a part of their “exclusive” education. Indoctrinating the professional class was a simple way for the Elites to control a population, because the rest of us are taught to turn to the professional class for all our answers. By scripting the world view of only 10% of educated Americans, they could control the world view of the rest of the country.

Of course, Chomsky forgot to include himself in this assessment, and he is just as much an unwitting victim of elitist propaganda as any other person in the professional class, as his completely irresponsible and illogical comments on the pursuit of a new investigation into 9/11 show. Basically, his argument is that the powers elites derived from the 9/11 attacks are merely a side benefit which they “took advantage of” but that there is no evidence that they created the event to gain these benefits (which has been proven thoroughly incorrect by numerous scientific “professionals” not beholden to the system). He also claims that even if it was engineered by the elites, it doesn’t matter and is of no significance:

The illusion inherent in the professional class is that they “know more” than the rest of us. That they have access to knowledge we could never understand. But the reality is, all knowledge is available to anyone willing to look for it and learn it. The laws of physics, the laws of biology, the laws of society, are available to EVERYONE, not just a select few. Globalist puppets and shills often use the argument that we (the uneducated dregs) should “listen to the experts” when it comes to subjects such as 9/11, the private Federal Reserve, swine flu, the economic collapse, etc. Essentially, they are saying we should put all our “faith” in these individuals, and leave the truth to the professionals. However, being that these professionals are the most indoctrinated people on the planet, whose entire world view has been shaped by the establishment, they are in fact the last people we should be turning to for our information. Not to mention, not all professionals agree on every topic. Ironically, when a professional comes out against the establishment, they are immediately labeled as “not professional or knowledgeable”. This video of the makers of Loose Change utterly destroying the editors of Popular Mechanics in a fair debate illustrates quite nicely the Intellectual Sheep Syndrome at work:

The truth exists for everyone, but the only way for everyone to attain it, is to find it for themselves. Sheep leading sheep is not the way to enlightenment, but disaster.

The Fight Continues

The Liberty Movement has made incredible strides in the past couple years, and our numbers have grown rapidly in a very short period. The fight to educate the masses remains an uphill battle, but our perseverance is finally paying off. We must be careful in unwarranted generalizations, labeling anyone not aware of the facts as “Sheeple,” for this is not always the reality. There are still many out there in the world simply on the fence. They need more information, more effort than others, but conscience directs that it is our job as those who know the truth to warn those who don’t. True Sheeple may try to obstruct our progress, but this has been going on for years and they have not stopped us yet. Take comfort in this fact, and ask yourself; How could they possibly stop us now…?

*Special Note: The term “Positivism” used in this article should not be confused with Comte’s “philosophy of Positivism,” which has similarities and parallels, but does not contain the New Agey happy-go-lucky fruit filling like the Positivism we examine here. Thanks for your attention, and thanks for visiting us here at Neithercorp.

from: Neithercorp

The Story of Your Enslavement

We can only be kept in the cages we do not see. A brief history of human enslavement – up to and including your own.

From Freedomain Radio, the largest and most popular philosophy conversation in the world.

www.freedomainradio.com

New MoD Strategic Report Extends Vision to 2040

Foresees the rise of a global elite that “sits above the level of individual states and influences the global agenda”

Old-Thinker News | March 18, 2010

By Daniel Taylor

In 2006, the United Kingdom’s Ministry of Defense published the DCDC Strategic Trends 2007-2036 report, outlining possible scenarios for technology, society and world politics. Among other issues, the 2006 report accurately envisioned a “revolutionary middle class” that would revolt against economic hardship and burdens of debt, and described a future population implanted with brain chips. A new report from the MoD titled Global Strategic Trends – Out to 2040 was published in February of this year, and extends the Ministry’s strategic vision to 2040.

Amidst the 168 pages of the report, these are a few highlights. The newest MoD paper, drawing influence from its predecessor, describes rapid changes in society that threaten to “radicalize” individuals who seek to maintain traditions and beliefs, while a global elite “…sits above the level of individual states and influences the global agenda…” By 2040 the MoD envisions a “global society” plagued with tensions brought about by globalization, and high technology exaggerates differences between haves and have nots. The MoD report states,

“The social tensions caused by intrusive global culture are likely to be most acute amongst those who seek to maintain their indigenous and traditional customs and beliefs, and feel threatened by changes. This is likely to lead to an increasing number of individuals and groups, many of whom form around single issues that differentiate them from wider society, becoming marginalised and possibly radicalised.”

These issues, along with the public response to economic hardship are driving the strategic vision of governments in the western world. In 2008 the Army War College released the report Known Unknowns: Unconventional Strategic Shocks in Defense Strategy Development. “Widespread civil violence inside the United States would force the defense establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic order and human security,” states the report. The western world has seen an unprecedented build up for domestic unrest as the machinery of governance built for anti-terrorism is turned inward.

Additionally, the latest Global Strategic Trends report peddles the climate change fear that more and more people are rejecting as an excuse to impose draconian measures on their lives. Indeed, the MoD report foresees a move away from “freedom of choice” to more “sustainable” practices in response to climate change. Chillingly, the paper states,

“The developed world is likely to experience a degree of transformation as it moves from a consumerist society based on freedom of choice to a more constrained, sustainable societal model that provides financial and social rewards to encourage greener practices and discourage waste.”

“Emergence of a global elite”

The state will remain the predominant player in world affairs according to the MoD report, but “…the emergence of a global elite, a powerful network of individuals and institutions that sits above the level of individual states and influences the global agenda, is also possible.” While the report foresees the rise of a global elite, the existence of a global elite is a well documented fact. One method of influence that the global elite wield is through large foundations. As the MoD report states, these operate above individual states and influence the global agenda.

In an interview with the Seattle Times, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon was asked, “Some say the emergence of super rich philanthropies like the Gates Foundation has undermined the effectiveness of the U.N. and its member organizations, like the WHO.” Moon responded,

“On the contrary that is what we really want — contributions from the business community as well as philanthropies. We need to have political support, but it doesn’t give us all that we need. NGOs and philanthropies and many foundations such as Bill Gates Foundation — they’re taking a very important role…”

In May of 2009 the so called “Good club” met in New York at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, president of Rockefeller University. According to the London Times, the meeting was so secret that, “…some of the billionaires’ aides were told they were at ‘security briefings’”. David Rockefeller Jr, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey were all in attendance. The Times reports, “Over dinner they discussed how they might settle on an “umbrella cause” that could harness their interests.” The Times interviewed a guest at the meeting, who said that the group wanted to meet in secret because they didn’t want their statements ending up in the media, “painting them as an alternative world government.”

In defense of the secrecy, the guest said that, “They need to be independent of government agencies, which are unable to head off the disaster we all see looming.”

“To be disconnected may be considered suspicious”

By 2040 – and likely before then – many futurists and scientists are projecting that technology will have advanced exponentially, bringing the much anticipated “singularity” closer. The MoD hints at some of these possible developments, including the emergence of an internet of things, radical life extension technology, and surveillance of personnel via mood sensing devices.

Computing will become pervasive everywhere in the environment. According to the report, “The virtual networks will consist of communications servers linking individuals and objects, many of which will be networked through individual Internet Protocol (IP) addresses.” Ultimately, as stated in the paper, it may become difficult to “turn the outside world off,” and “…Even amongst those who make an explicit life-style choice to remain detached, choosing to be disconnected may be considered suspicious behaviour.”

Furthermore, life extension technology will “have a significant impact on global society,” and “…initial access… could be highly unequal and only be available to wealthier members of society.”

Old-Thinker News

Η λογική της καταστροφικής μανίας της εξουσίας

Κείμενα σχετικά με την καταστροφική μανία της εξουσίας

Disaster Capitalism



Brent Jessop articles

H εγκληματική αλλαγή

Demoralization, Destabilization, Insurgency, Normalization

Η χαμένη τιμή των Ελλήνων

Του ΚΩΝ/ΝΟΥ Π. ΡΩΜΑΝΟΥ Πανεπιστήμιο Αιγαίου

Ο Σημίτης έδωσε και πάλι τη βασική φόρμουλα για την ανθρωπολογική μετάλλαξη των Ελλήνων όταν είπε ότι το κύριο εμπόδιο στην ανάπτυξη ήταν η ιδιαιτερότητα των Ελλήνων.

Να παρατηρήσουμε εδώ ότι δεν αναζήτησε την αιτία της «κακοδαιμονίας» μας σε κάποιο επιμέρους συστατικό στοιχείο της ελληνικής ταυτότητας (π.χ. την Ορθοδοξία ή τον κοραϊσμό ή τον ραγιαδισμό, τον ατομικισμό κ.λπ.) το οποίο εξοβελίζοντας θα μπορούσαμε να ελπίσουμε σ’ ένα πιο θετικό μέλλον. Όχι, ολάκερη η ιδιαιτερότητα των Ελλήνων, δηλαδή ό,τι συνιστά την ελληνικότητα αυτήν καθαυτήν μπήκε στο στόχαστρο του «εκσυγχρονιστικού» λόγου. Το στοίχημα ήταν οι Έλληνες να πάψουν να είναι Έλληνες προκειμένου να… προοδεύσουν. Η πρόοδος, η ανάπτυξη, ο εκσυγχρονισμός ήταν ο προβαλλόμενος στόχος. Η ανθρωπολογική μετάλλαξη των Ελλήνων, το μέσον για την επίτευξη του στόχου αυτού.

Από την αρχή της διακυβέρνησης Σημίτη ως σήμερα η αποελληνοποίηση της Ελλάδος έγινε στην αρχή ψιθυριστά, αργότερα φωναχτά, αλλά πάντα με συνέπεια και αμείωτη ένταση. Το μεσοδιάστημα της κυβέρνησης των συντηρητικών δεν άλλαξε τίποτα στη ροή αυτήν των πραγμάτων. Μάλιστα συνέτεινε, μπορεί να πει κανείς, στην απρόσκοπτη λειτουργία του σχεδιασμού αποδόμησης του έθνους με το να δεσμεύσει ένα πατριωτικό δυναμικό το οποίο, χωρίς τη χειραγώγηση των συντηρητικών, θα μπορούσε να είχε απειλήσει τους ανθελληνικούς σχεδιασμούς. Έτσι π.χ. η εκδηλωθείσα αντίσταση του λαού στην παραποίηση της Ιστορίας στα νέα σχολικά βιβλία των ετών 2006-2007 έσβησε πρόωρα μόλις η κυβέρνηση έκανε τον απλό ελιγμό να αποσύρει ένα και μόνο βιβλίο (από τις εκατοντάδες) από την κυκλοφορία και την αρμόδιο υπουργό από την υπηρεσία.

Η μεθοδολογία της εθνοκτονίας με επιστημονική συνέπεια επικεντρώθηκε στους δύο κεντρικούς άξονες αναπαραγωγής μιας ανθρώπινης κοινωνίας, την παιδεία και τη δημογραφία. Με άκρα μυστικότητα επετεύχθη η αλλαγή των περιεχομένων της σχολικής παιδείας και η ιδεολογική μετατόπιση της κατεστημένης ακαδημαϊκής και πολιτικής νομενκλατούρας, με τους συμπληρωματικούς στόχους να αμφισβητηθεί η ελληνικότητα αφενός και να γίνει αποδεκτός ως τετελεσμένο γεγονός ο εποικισμός της σκόπιμα αφύλακτης χώρας από εκατομμύρια λαθρομετανάστες αφετέρου. Όπως ήταν προβλεπόμενο, η εισαγωγή σε μεγάλη κλίμακα των τελευταίων στα ελληνικά σχολεία θα έκανε επιτακτική πλέον και νόμιμη τη μετάλλαξη της εθνικής παιδείας σε πολυεθνική. (Η μαζική εισαγωγή λαθρομεταναστών στα ελληνικά σχολεία ήταν βεβαίως αντισυνταγματική εφόσον το Σύνταγμα καθορίζει ότι η Παιδεία είναι δωρεάν και υποχρεωτική για όλους τους Έλληνες – αποκλείοντας έτσι τους μη Έλληνες.) Ταυτόχρονα θα παγίωνε την εθνογραφική αλλοίωση του ελληνικού πληθυσμού προσφέροντας «πάτημα» για την ελληνοποίηση των ξένων μόλις θα έφταναν στην ηλικία των 18 ετών. Η ελληνοποίηση με τη συνακόλουθη αλλαγή του κώδικα ιθαγένειας έγινε τον Μάρτιο του 2010 από την κυβέρνηση ΠΑΣΟΚ ολοκληρώνοντας την προηγηθείσα νομιμοποίηση της Νέας Δημοκρατίας του τέλους του 2008 (καθεστώς του «επί μακρόν διαμένοντος»).

Η νεοταξική αριστερόστροφη προπαγάνδα για την καλλιέργεια οικειοφοβίας, δηλαδή απομάκρυνσης από την ελληνικότητα με τη συνακόλουθη απαίτηση να αλλοτριωθούμε αγκαλιάζοντας τον «Άλλο» ως «διαφορετικότητα», αποτελεί δυστυχώς χρόνια τώρα μια θλιβερή σταθερά της καθημερινότητας του Έλληνα. Είναι η ίδια προπαγάνδα που απαντάται ως γκράφιτι των Εξαρχείων, ως ανάλυση των ΜΜΕ και ως διδακτικό περιεχόμενο των σχολικών βιβλίων. Συνοψίζεται στις παροτρύνσεις να μην είμαστε «ξενοφοβικοί» (παραβλέποντας ότι καθόλου δεν γνωρίζουμε τις προθέσεις του ξένου που μπήκε από το παράθυρο), να μην είμαστε «ρατσιστές» (δηλαδή να αδιαφορήσουμε για τους προγόνους, το γένος και τη φυλή μας) και να μην είμαστε «εθνικιστές» (δηλαδή να παραιτηθούμε από την αξίωση να έχουμε ως έθνος δικό μας κράτος-προστάτη ή ακόμα και απλώς να υπάρχουμε ως διακριτό έθνος ανάμεσα στα άλλα έθνη). Πρόκειται για προπαγάνδα επιστημονικής αποδόμησης η οποία συν τοις άλλοις κατασκευάζει ενοχικά σύνδρομα που αφορούν το ήθος και τις συλλογικές δράσεις του «κακού Έλληνα» μέσα στην ιστορία. Οι κατηγορίες είναι δανεισμένες από το παλαιό και το νεώτερο ρεπερτόριο του ανθελληνισμού. Υποθέτω ότι η πλήρης εσωτερίκευσή τους οδηγεί στην αυτοαπαξίωση του Έλληνα ως ανθρωπολογικού τύπου.

Αυτό στη γλώσσα των κομπιούτερ στο πλαίσιο μιας «κοινωνικής μηχανικής» (social engineering) θα σήμαινε ότι η φάση του «αποπρογραμματισμού» του ιστορικού υποκειμένου Έλλην περατώθηκε πλέον επιτυχώς και τώρα μπορεί να αρχίσει η αντίστροφη διαδικασία «αναπρογραμματισμού» του εκκενωθέντος από κάθε ιστορική μνήμη ανθρώπινου πλάσματος με νέα περιεχόμενα. Με άλλα λόγια, εκεί όπου ήδη επιτεύχθηκε η παραγωγή «γυμνού» ανθρώπου μπορεί να προχωρήσει η νέα εποχή στην πειραματική κατασκευή κάποιου νεοφανούς μιγαδικού πολιτισμικοφυλετικού ανθρωπολογικού τύπου στη νοτιοανατολική Ευρώπη (πρώην Ελλάδα).

Ίσως για την έναρξη του σχεδιαζόμενου αναπρογραμματισμού το υπουργείο Παιδείας μελετά επί του παρόντος (όπως ακούγεται) την εισαγωγή νέων σχολικών βιβλίων που θα αντικαταστήσουν τα υπάρχοντα που στόχο είχαν τον αποπρογραμματισμό. Ίσως ο αναπρογραμματισμός των –πρώην– Ελλήνων να είναι στη συνέχεια και η αποστολή των πολυάριθμων μη κυβερνητικών οργανώσεων που η νέα κυβέρνηση δεν κατήργησε παρά τα υποτιθέμενα μέτρα περιορισμού των εξόδων στη σημερινή κρίση.

Αν επιμείνει κανείς στο ερώτημα ποιος θα είναι (επιτέλους) ο σχεδιαζόμενος από τα κέντρα εξουσίας ανθρωπολογικός τύπος του μετα-Έλληνα θα βρει ήδη σήμερα προτεινόμενες φαντασιακές ταυτότητες, οι οποίες ξαφνιάζουν με την αφέλεια που τις διακρίνει: «πολίτης μιας σύγχρονης ευρωπαϊκής πολυπολιτιστικής κοινωνίας» ή «πολίτης της Γης» ή απλώς «Άνθρωπος»… Μια στοιχειώδης κριτική δείχνει ότι με τα ανοικονόμητα εκατομμύρια αφρικανών, ασιατών και βαλκάνιων λαθρομεταναστών και τα συνεπακόλουθα προβλήματα της γκετοποίησης, της εγκληματικότητας, της επιδημιολογικής μόλυνσης (450.000 κρούσματα ηπατίτιδας στην Ελλάδα! – «Ελευθεροτυπία» 19 Μαΐου 2010) και γενικότερης επαπειλούμενης κατάρρευσης των ελληνικών υποδομών, η Ελλάδα αντί να πλησιάζει, αντιθέτως συνεχώς απομακρύνεται από τον ευρωπαϊκό μέσο όρο ομοιάζοντας όλο και περισσότερο με τριτοκοσμικό κρατικό μόρφωμα. Επίσης η κριτική δείχνει ότι δεν υπάρχουν διαβατήρια για «πολίτες της Γης» ούτε ελευθερία εγκατάστασης σε όποια μέρη του πλανήτη θα προσπαθήσουν να καταφύγουν άφρονες Έλληνες μετά την καταστροφή της πατρίδας τους. Τέλος «Άνθρωπος» χωρίς εθνοτικό, πολιτισμικό, θρησκευτικό, πολιτικό προσδιορισμό δεν υπάρχει, μόνο ο σκύλος, η γάτα και το όποιο ζώο είναι απλώς σκύλος και γάτα οπουδήποτε χωρίς περαιτέρω προσδιορισμό.

«Άνθρωπος» χωρίς ιδιαιτερότητα δεν είναι παρά ένα ζώο! Προφανώς τέτοια ζώα, τέτοια ανθρώπινα μηδενικά, βδελύγματα πάνω στο πρόσωπο της Γης, θα κατασκευάσουν στην Ελλάδα οι σκοτεινοί κύριοι προγραμματιζόμενων εθνοκτονιών.

Πραγματικά αποφάσισαν λοιπόν οι Έλληνες, θα πει κανείς, να απεμπολήσουν την ιδιαιτερότητά τους για να γίνουν πιο άνθρωποι ή πιο Ευρωπαίοι, τέλος πάντων για να εκσυγχρονισθούν και να αναπτυχθούν όπως το ήθελε ο Σημίτης; Αν πιστέψει κανείς ότι αυτοί που δέχθηκαν να μεταλλαχθούν (και δεν ήσαν προς Θεού όλοι) το έπραξαν για ιδανιστικούς αποκλειστικά λόγους, απατάται σίγουρα. Δεν ξέρει δηλαδή να διαβάζει το πραγματικό μήνυμα της εξουσίας ανάμεσα στις γραμμές των επίσημων διακηρύξεων.

Εδώ το μήνυμα ήταν ένα και μοναδικό: Ξεχάστε αυτά που πιστεύατε ως Έλληνες και εμείς σας εγγυώμεθα υψηλή κατανάλωση και ευημερία! Ως Έλληνες δεν έχετε μέλλον στην Ελλάδα, γιατί οι ανώτερες εξουσίες έχουν άλλα σχέδια για την Ελλάδα! Ως απλές βιολογικές υπάρξεις όμως, αφημένες στα δικά μας χέρια να τις μορφώσουμε όπως καλύτερα ξέρουμε εμείς, επιτρέπουμε να επιβιώσετε και μάλιστα σε υψηλό επίπεδο. Όσοι τυχόν αρνηθούν και αντισταθούν θα αποκλεισθούν από όλες τις απολαβές, κοινωνικές, επαγγελματικές, πολιτικές. Θα ζουν με τον φόβο του κράτους και μαζί τού παρακράτους που χτυπάει εκεί όπου δεν φτάνει ο νόμος. Αν δε επιμείνουν ότι «η Ελλάδα ανήκει στους Έλληνες» θα βρουν απέναντί τους και τους συνασπισμένους «ελληνοποιημένους» αλλοδαπούς πραιτωριανούς.

Αυτοί ήταν οι όροι του συμβολαίου που η εξουσία πρότεινε στους Έλληνες και πολλοί δελεάσθηκαν. «Η τιμή τιμή δεν έχει και χαράς τον που τη… χάνει!» σκέφτηκαν. Όμως αυτό που επέμεινε να διαχειρισθεί η εξουσία χωρίς εξαιρέσεις ήταν τα παιδιά. Τα αφελληνισμένα σχολεία περίμεναν τα ελληνόπαιδα με τον Χασάν στο ίδιο θρανίο, υλικό για μετάλλαξη. Τι θα έπρατταν άραγε οι γονείς, οι σύλλογοι γονέων και κηδεμόνων; Θα δημιουργούσαν προβλήματα επειδή τα παιδιά τους διδάσκονταν ανθελληνικά βιβλία και θα αμφισβητούσαν τη νομιμότητα της εισαγωγής λαθρομεταναστών χωρίς τα νόμιμα δικαιολογητικά στο σχολείο που πλήρωσαν γενεές επί γενεών ελλήνων φορολογουμένων; Ή θα άφηναν ό,τι πολυτιμότερο είχαν, τα παιδάκια τους δηλαδή, τα μοναχοπαίδια τους μάλιστα (διότι δεν κάνουν πάνω από ένα παιδί) βορά στο αντεθνικό υπουργείο Παιδείας; Γνωρίζουμε δυστυχώς την απάντηση…

Πώς όμως να ερμηνεύσει κανείς την παρούσα πτώχευση της Ελλάδας, την περικοπή μισθών και συντάξεων, την αύξηση των φόρων στα καταναλωτικά αγαθά κ.λπ., δεδομένης της ανειλημμένης υποχρέωσης της εξουσίας να ανταμείψει πλουσιοπάροχα όσους εδέχθηκαν τον αφελληνισμό τους; Η απάντηση είναι γνωστή από τα αρχαία χρόνια: Ο διάβολος δεν κρατάει τον λόγο του. Γιατί να ξοδεύεται εσαεί γι’ αυτούς που τώρα πια είναι ένα τίποτα; Αφού οι Έλληνες έχασαν οικειοθελώς την τιμή τους, να χάσουν τώρα και το… αντίτιμο. Άλλωστε δεν τα έδωσαν όλα ακόμα, ποιος ξέρει αν πιεζόμενοι δεν θα δώσουν και τα υπόλοιπα!

Η ανυποληψία όσων ανθρώπων πρόδωσαν το λίκνο της Ευρώπης, τους προγόνους και το όνομά τους για τον Μαμμωνά δεν διέφυγε την προσοχή των Ευρωπαίων των οποίων ο παραδοσιακός φιλελληνισμός υπό το κράτος της ματαίωσης γύρισε τώρα στο εξίσου παραδοσιακό του αντίθετο, τον ανθελληνισμό.

Έτσι η διάθεση να μας απαξιώσουν, ηθικά και διανοητικά με κάθε τρόπο μιλάει καθημερινώς μέσα από χίλια και ένα άρθρα του ευρωπαϊκού Τύπου για τη χρεοκοπημένη, ψεύτικη, αδηφάγα, πρόστυχη Ελλάδα, η οποία τώρα πρέπει να τιμωρηθεί, να ταπεινωθεί, να ματώσει με κάθε τρόπο, στο τέλος δε και να εκδιωχθεί από την Ευρώπη! Ακόμα κι έναν Τούρκο να π….. έναν τσολιά σκιτσάρισε ευρωπαίος γελοιογράφος… Όχι: τέτοιο μένος, τέτοιο διασυρμό δεν επιφυλάσσει κανείς σε δανειολήπτη που απλώς αδυνατεί να πληρώσει. Τον επιφυλάσσει μόνο σε άνθρωπο που έχασε την τιμή του.

Αν δεν θέλει να χάσει τα πάντα, ο ελλαδικός Ελληνισμός πρέπει να κινητοποιήσει τις υγιείς δυνάμεις που διαθέτει το αρχαίο του κύτταρο για να γίνει τιμωρός των πρωταιτίων της προδοσίας και παιδαγωγός των παραστρατημένων, που όμως βαθιά μέσα τους φέρουν το φως της Ελλάδος.

ΤΟ ΠΑΡΟΝ ΤΗΣ ΚΥΡΙΑΚΗΣ 06/06/2010

Ήξεραν τα πάντα! Απάτη το Μνημόνιο!

του Γιώργου Δελαστίκ

Η κυβέρνηση και η ΕΕ συνεργάστηκαν για να εξαπατήσουν τον ελληνικό λαό. Έστησαν το παραμύθι με τη δήθεν απειλούμενη χρεοκοπία, προκειμένου να παραλύσουν τις αντιδράσεις του τρομοκρατημένου ελληνικού λαού, πετυχαίνοντας έτσι να τον μετατρέψουν σε «πειραματόζωο» πανευρωπαϊκής χρησιμότητας.

Τίναξε στον αέρα τη βάση όλης της πολιτικής του πρωθυπουργού Γιώργου Παπανδρέου η δημόσια ομολογία του προέδρου του Eurogroup Ζαν-Κλοντ Γιουνκέρ ότι οι ηγέτες της ΕΕ ήξεραν επί δεκαετίες τα πάντα για την πραγματική κατάσταση της ελληνικής οικονομίας, αλλά δεν μιλούσαν και δεν πίεζαν να αλλάξει τίποτα, επειδή η Γερμανία και η Γαλλία επωφελούνταν τα μέγιστα από τις εξαγωγές τους στη χώρα μας!

Καταρρέει με την παραδοχή του Γιουνκέρ όλο το οικοδόμημα της πολιτικής απάτης, στην οποία ο Γιώργος Παπανδρέου στήριξε το παραμύθι ότι δήθεν το καθεστώς υποτέλειας στην ΕΕ και στο ΔΝΤ που υπήγαγε την Ελλάδα μέσω του Μνημονίου υπήρξε απόρροια της αποκάλυψης της άθλιας κατάστασης που άφησε την οικονομία μας η κυβέρνηση Καραμανλή στα μάτια των «εμβρόντητων» Ευρωπαίων.

Αφού ο Γιουνκέρ δηλώνει ευθαρσώς ότι οι Ευρωπαίοι γνώριζαν την κατάσταση εδώ και δεκαετίες, ασχέτως του ότι δεν μιλούσαν γι’ αυτή δημοσίως, είναι προφανές ότι μόνο έκπληκτοι δεν έμειναν όταν ανέλαβε πέρσι τον Οκτώβριο πρωθυπουργός της χώρας ο Γιώργος Παπανδρέου και άρχισε να διαλαλεί ότι «η ελληνική οικονομία βρίσκεται στην Εντατική», συνοδευόμενος από τον υπουργό Οικονομικών Γιώργο Παπακωνσταντίνου που διατυμπάνιζε ότι «η Ελλάδα είναι “Τιτανικός”»!

Ο πρωθυπουργός ψεύδεται
Παράλληλα, έχουμε πλέον και επίσημη επιβεβαίωση του γεγονότος ότι ο Γιώργος Παπανδρέου ψεύδεται ασύστολα, όταν ισχυρίζεται ότι έλαβε γνώση της κατάστασης της οικονομίας της χώρας αφότου ανέλαβε τη διακυβέρνησή της.

Ο τέως υπουργός Οικονομικών της Γερμανίας, ο σοσιαλδημοκράτης Πέερ Στάινμπρικ αποκάλυψε σε άρτι εκδοθέν βιβλίο του ότι είχε ο ίδιος πλήρως ενημερώσει τον Γιώργο Παπανδρέου για την πραγματική κατάσταση της ελληνικής οικονομίας ήδη από τον Ιανουάριο του 2009, πολύ πριν από τις περσινές βουλευτικές εκλογές που έφεραν το ΠΑΣΟΚ θριαμβευτικά στην εξουσία. Μάλιστα, κατά το Γερμανό τέως υπουργό, ο Γιώργος Παπανδρέου εμφανίστηκε προβληματισμένος μετά την ενημέρωση και του εξέφρασε την ταλάντευσή του για το εάν έπρεπε ή όχι να επιδιώξει να κερδίσει την πρωθυπουργία υπ’ αυτές τις συνθήκες.

Δεν τόλμησε φυσικά ο Γιώργος Παπανδρέου να προβεί σε οποιαδήποτε διάψευση των ισχυρισμών του Πέερ Στάινμπρικ, αλλά κατά τα άλλα έκανε προεκλογική σημαία του το σύνθημα… «Λεφτά υπάρχουν», αποδεικνύοντας πόσο υποκριτικοί ήταν οι δήθεν δισταγμοί του να κατακτήσει την εξουσία.

Μας εξαπάτησαν
Οι Ευρωπαίοι ηγέτες ήξεραν από πριν την κατάσταση της ελληνικής οικονομίας, αποκάλυψε ο Γιουνκέρ. Ο Γιώργος Παπανδρέου ήξερε από πριν τα πάντα, αποκάλυψε ο Στάινμπρικ. Άρα και οι μεν και ο δε εξαπάτησαν ασύστολα τον ελληνικό λαό με την κωμωδία που έστησαν από πέρσι τον Οκτώβριο, με τον πρωθυπουργό της Ελλάδας να αποκαλύπτει, δήθεν, τα σημεία και τέρατα της οικονομικής διακυβέρνησης Καραμανλή και τους Ευρωπαίους ηγέτες να πέφτουν, δήθεν, από τα σύννεφα και να αποφασίζουν να στερήσουν την οικονομική ανεξαρτησία της χώρας μας.

Υπό το φως αυτών των αποκαλύψεων αποκτά νέα διάσταση η ειλικρινέστατη, όπως αποδεικνύεται, δήλωση του υφυπουργού Οικονομικών Φίλιππου Σαχινίδη στη ΝΕΤ, στις αρχές Μαΐου, ότι η κυβέρνηση του ΠΑΣΟΚ είχε ήδη αποφασίσει την προσφυγή στο ΔΝΤ από την επομένη των εκλογών που την έφεραν στην εξουσία.

Η δήλωση Σαχινίδη μας βοηθά να συνειδητοποιήσουμε βαθύτερα την πραγματική φύση και τους πραγματικούς στόχους της κυβέρνησης Παπανδρέου και να αντιληφθούμε πού θέλει να οδηγήσει τη χώρα ο πρωθυπουργός, ανεξάρτητα από τα όσα διακηρύσσει δημοσίως.

Η κυβέρνηση και η ΕΕ συνεργάστηκαν για να εξαπατήσουν τον ελληνικό λαό. Έστησαν το παραμύθι με τη δήθεν απειλούμενη χρεοκοπία, προκειμένου να παραλύσουν τις αντιδράσεις του τρομοκρατημένου ελληνικού λαού, πετυχαίνοντας έτσι να τον μετατρέψουν σε «πειραματόζωο» πανευρωπαϊκής χρησιμότητας. Μελετούν τις –ουσιαστικά ανύπαρκτες μέχρι τώρα– αντιδράσεις των Ελλήνων σε ακραία μέτρα περικοπής μισθών και συντάξεων, αγριότατης φορολόγησης, εκποίησης της δημόσιας περιουσίας, υποβάθμισης της υγείας, της παιδείας, των κρατικών υπηρεσιών κοινής ωφέλειας…

ΔΝΤ και ξερό ψωμί
Προκειμένου να υλοποιήσει τον προεκλογικά αποφασισμένο στόχο του να οδηγήσει την Ελλάδα σε καθεστώς υποτέλειας στο ΔΝΤ που ελέγχεται από τους Αμερικανούς, ο Γιώργος Παπανδρέου, από την πρώτη στιγμή που ανέλαβε τη διακυβέρνηση της χώρας, αποκάλυψε δημόσια την κατάσταση της ελληνικής οικονομίας που όλοι οι ηγέτες της ΕΕ ήξεραν αλλά όλοι έκρυβαν – άλλοι για λόγους συμφέροντος και άλλοι για λόγους σκοπιμότητας που αφορά την ίδια τη λειτουργία της ΕΕ.

Καθώς τα κομμάτια του παζλ συμπληρώνονται ένα ένα με την πάροδο του χρόνου και καθώς ολοένα και περισσότερα στόματα ανοίγουν, μπορούμε τώρα να πούμε ότι αρχικά η στάση του Γιώργου Παπανδρέου αιφνιδίασε τους ηγέτες της ΕΕ. Όχι φυσικά γιατί ενδιαφέρονται για την Ελλάδα, αλλά γιατί ανάλογη συγκάλυψη της κατάστασης επικρατούσε κοινή συναινέσει για πολλές χώρες-μέλη της ΕΕ. Γι’ αυτό και η αρχική στάση των Ευρωπαίων ηγετών ήταν αμήχανη, μουδιασμένη. Δεν ήξεραν ακόμη πώς να χειριστούν το θέμα.

Ο Γιώργος Παπανδρέου πολιορκούσε φορτικά ήδη από τον Οκτώβριο το διευθυντή του ΔΝΤ Ντομινίκ Στρος-Καν για να υπαγάγει αμέσως την Ελλάδα σε καθεστώς Μνημονίου, παρόλο που ο τελευταίος τον παρέπεμπε συστηματικά στην Ευρωζώνη. Η αντίφαση λύθηκε, όταν τελικά οι Γερμανοί αποφάσισαν να χρησιμοποιηθεί το ΔΝΤ ως «σκουπιδοτενεκές» για τα δεύτερης κατηγορίας μέλη της ΕΕ και, ταυτόχρονα, ως μοχλός επιβολής εξοντωτικής λιτότητας και κατάλυσης των κοινωνικών κατακτήσεων των ευρωπαϊκών κρατών, στο πλαίσιο μιας πανευρωπαϊκής υστερίας πολιτικής λιτότητας σε όλες τις χώρες-μέλη της ΕΕ και πρωτίστως της Ευρωζώνης.

Μέτωπο κατά απατεώνων
Σίγουρα έχει την αυτοτελή, δική της σημασία το γεγονός της αποκάλυψης ότι τόσο η ΕΕ όσο και ο Γιώργος Παπανδρέου ήξεραν εκ των προτέρων την οικονομική κατάσταση της Ελλάδας και εξαπατούσαν το λαό της υποκρινόμενοι τους αδαείς. Σοβαρό θέμα, αλλά το σημαντικότερο είναι άλλο.

Αφού επί δεκαετίες γνώριζαν την κατάσταση οι Ευρωπαίοι εταίροι της ΕΕ και δεν έκαναν τίποτα, είναι προφανές ότι καμιά «αδήριτη ανάγκη» δεν υπήρχε για καθεστώς Μνημονίου. Αν ήταν αναγκαίο, θα μας το είχαν επιβάλει νωρίτερα.

Ας μην γελιόμαστε. Το Μνημόνιο δεν είναι φάρμακο θεραπείας των μακροοικονομικών δεικτών της ελληνικής οικονομίας. Το Μνημόνιο συνιστά αυτοτελές επιθετικό σχέδιο αναμόρφωσης της ελληνικής κοινωνίας. Σημασία για τον Γιώργο Παπανδρέου και την ΕΕ έχουν αυτοτελώς τα μέτρα που προβλέπει το Μνημόνιο – η μείωση μισθών και συντάξεων, το φορολογικό «γδάρσιμο» όλων των Ελλήνων που ήδη πληρώνουν φόρους, η κατάλυση του κοινωνικού κράτους.

Πάλη για το μέλλον
Το Μνημόνιο Παπανδρέου – ΕΕ – ΔΝΤ έχει στόχο την επιβολή ενός κοινωνικού Μεσαίωνα. Το ένα εκατομμύριο άνεργοι που θα προκαλέσει φέτος θα είναι μόνο η αρχή. Το Μνημόνιο αποσκοπεί στη διαρκή υποβάθμιση του βιοτικού επιπέδου του ελληνικού λαού, εδραζόμενο στην ακραία νεοφιλελεύθερη αντίληψη ότι όσο πιο πολύ φτωχαίνουν οι Έλληνες και πέφτουν οι μισθοί, οι συντάξεις και τα εισοδήματά τους, τόσο πιο… «ανταγωνιστική» θα γίνεται η ελληνική οικονομία. Όσο πιο φτηνά δηλαδή αγοράζουν τις υπηρεσίες μας, τις επιχειρήσεις μας ή τη γη μας οι Γερμανοί, τόσο καλύτερα, πιστεύει η κυβέρνηση Παπανδρέου.

Είναι προφανές ότι από το εάν θα επιβληθεί τελικά ή θα ανατραπεί το Μνημόνιο θα κριθεί το μέλλον της πατρίδας μας. Αν, δηλαδή, θα μετατραπεί η Ελλάδα σε μια εξαρτημένη, ξεπουλημένη χώρα, η οποία από τα ταχυδρομεία και τα τρένα έως το ηλεκτρικό και το νερό θα βρίσκεται στα χέρια ξένων δυναστών, όπως επιδιώκει ο Γιώργος Παπανδρέου και η κυβέρνησή του σε συνεργασία με την ΕΕ και το ΔΝΤ, ή αν θα ξαναζήσουμε ημέρες εθνικής αξιοπρέπειας ανατρέποντας το Μνημόνιο και τους φορείς του.

ΕΠΙΚΑΙΡΑ (m-epikaira.gr)

Όχι στην ένδεια

Για να καταλάβουμε τις προθέσεις των ανθρώπων που μας έφεραν σε αυτή τη κατάσταση πρέπει να ακούσουμε με προσοχή τα λόγια των εντολοδόχων τους.
Η διαρκής επανάληψη της δήθεν ανάγκης για παγκόσμια διακυβέρνηση είναι μια ξεκάθαρη ένδειξη για τη συνέχεια του έργου.
Η εξαθλίωση του ελληνικού λαού, όχι όλων των Ελλήνων, αλλά μιας πολύ μεγάλης μερίδας του, αναμένεται να οδηγήσει σε κάποιου είδους εξέγερση.
Η εξέγερση, αν τυχόν δεν ξεκινήσει, γιατί ακόμα και αυτό είναι πιθανό, αφού η ελληνική κοινωνία έχει περάσει εδώ και δεκαετίες σε μια κωματώδη σχεδόν κατάσταση, αν δεν ξεκινήσει αυθόρμητα, θα ξεκινήσει με το ζόρι από τους γνωστούς άγνωστους και όσο αφορά τα παγκόσμια μέσα ενημέρωσης θα είναι μια μεγάλη εξέγερση άσχετα αν θα διεξάγεται από μερικές μόνο εκατοντάδες εμπρηστές.
Στο τέλος αυτής της “εξέγερσης” εγχώριας ή και διεθνούς και με το πιθανό αιματοκύλισμα να ζητά μια δικαίωση, θα εμφανιστεί η λύση.
Η λύση αυτή θα είναι η παγκόσμια κεντρική τράπεζα και η παγκόσμια διακυβέρνηση.
Στην διαδικασία της δραματοποίησης δεν είναι απαραίτητο να συμμετέχει σύσσωμος ο ελληνικός λαός.
Αρκεί να βγουν άφθονα πλάνα καταστροφής που μέσα από τις κάμερες θα εμφανίζονται σαν την μεγαλύτερη εξέγερση των τελευταίων δεκαετιών.
Η εξέγερση του Δεκέμβρη του 2008 είχε σαφέστατα βοηθηθεί από παρακρατικούς ή άλλους αγνώστου ταυτότητας “βοηθούς” εκτός των λαθρομεταναστών που βρήκαν την ευκαιρία και συμμετείχαν.
Αλλά και η ίδια η αιτία της εξέγερσης, (για πολλούς η αφορμή της), η δολοφονία του Γρηγορόπουλου δεν μοιάζει και τόσο αυθόρμητη και τυχαία. Η δολοφονία ενός νέου παιδιού με το συγκεκριμένο τρόπο που έγινε, μόνο μια μεγάλη εξέγερση θα είχε σαν αποτέλεσμα.
Το αν ενισχύθηκε ή όχι, ή το αν αφέθηκε επίτηδες να παραδοθεί η Αθήνα στις φλόγες για χάρη των παγκόσμιων μέσων ενημέρωσης είναι κάτι που ίσως μάθουμε πολλά χρόνια μετά.
Το εμφανές δίλημμα της τότε κυβέρνησης, “να τους αφήσουμε να τα κάψουν όλα ή να έχουμε και άλλα θύματα” ήταν ίσως ένα πραγματικό δίλημμα. Και δεν έχουμε καταλάβει ακόμα αν πράγματι είναι ταμπού η σύλληψη των δήθεν αντιεξουσιαστών ή απλά είναι προτιμότερα θύματα οι μαθητές γυμνασίου και οι συνταξιούχοι, οι απλοί απεργοί ή διαδηλωτές ή όσοι τύχει απλά να κρατούν μια ελληνική σημαία, ή όποιοι από τους παραπάνω εμφανίζονται ανυπεράσπιστοι και εύκαιροι για ξυλοκόπημα και σύλληψη.
Στο τέλος, η δραματικότητα της φωτιάς έστειλε τους απλούς πολίτες στα σπίτια τους και άφησε το πεδίο στους “επαγγελματίες” κάθε είδους και στους πλιατσικολόγους. Έτσι η αποτελεσματικότητα της μη επέμβασης που επέλεξαν οι αρχές τον Δεκέμβρη του 2008 ήταν αδιαμφισβήτητη. Αυτό που φάνηκε είναι η αναποτελεσματικότητα της τυφλής οργής, του όχλου και της τυφλής εκδίκησης έστω και αν πρωταρχικός στόχος ήταν μεγαλοκαταστήματα και τράπεζες, με αποτέλεσμα όμως να καούν και όλα τα υπόλοιπα. Η τυφλή οργή όμως θα μπορούσε ακριβώς να είναι και η επιδίωξη μιας τέτοιας ενέργειας, όπως η δολοφονία εν ψυχρώ ενός αθώου παιδιού. Είναι εξαιρετικά δύσκολο να πιστέψει κανείς πως με αφορμή έναν διαπληκτισμό όπως αυτός που προηγήθηκε της δολοφονίας, ο αστυνομικός έβγαλε το περίστροφο και πυροβόλησε προσπαθώντας να σκοτώσει και μετά απλά περπάτησε πίσω στο περιπολικό σαν να μην συνέβη τίποτα.
Σε κάθε περίπτωση, το σύστημα έχει τους τρόπους να χρησιμοποιεί σχεδόν τα πάντα προς όφελός του.
Η εξέλιξη της δολοφονίας των τραπεζοϋπαλλήλων της Μαρφίν το αποδεικνύει για ακόμα μια φορά.
Στην περίπτωση της λεηλασίας και της εξαθλίωσης που επιχειρείται με το Δ.Ν.Τ. και την “βοήθεια” πακέτο (με τους υψηλούς τόκους) που μας “προσφέρει” η Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση, δεν μπορεί να μην παρατηρήσει κανείς την όλη μεθόδευση και να βγάλει κάποια συμπεράσματα. Η στόχευση της Ελλάδας αντί μιας άλλης Ευρωπαϊκής χώρας δεν μπορεί παρά να σημαίνει ένα από δύο πράγματα. Ή πιστεύουν πως είμαστε ένας λαός που θα δεχτεί αδιαμαρτύρητα την καταστροφή του ώστε να αποτελέσουμε το παράδειγμα για την εξάπλωση της νεοφεουδαρχίας σε όλο τον δυτικό κόσμο, ή αντίθετα υπολογίζουν στην γνωστή ανυπακοή μας για να στήσουν μια δραματική έκβαση σαν αποτέλεσμα της πίεσης που δεχόμαστε.
Το Δ.Ν.Τ. και η Τ.Δ.Δ. (BIS) έχουν στόχο να πρωτοστατήσουν στη επιβολή του φόρου του διοξειδίου του άνθρακα σαν το νέο παγκόσμιο νόμισμα. Η κυβέρνηση είχε από την αρχή σαν μοναδική επιλογή της την επιβολή του Δ.Ν.Τ. στην ελληνική επικράτεια.
Το γεγονός πως προσπάθησε να το κρύψει δείχνει το προσχεδιασμένο του πράγματος. Όλοι οι άλλοι χειρισμοί τους επιβεβαιώνουν αυτή την επιλογή.
Είναι λοιπόν αναμενόμενο πως η λύση θα δοθεί με την μετάλλαξη της Τ.Δ.Δ ή του Δ.Ν.Τ. σε μιας άλλης μορφής σωτήριου παγκόσμιου οργανισμού ο οποίος θα δώσει μια πιο δραστική λύση στο “πρόβλημα” των χρεωμένων κρατών που τα ίδια τα αφεντικά του έχουν δημιουργήσει.
Αυτό αναμένει και αναζητεί ο Παπανδρέου και με κάθε ευκαιρία το εκφράζει. Αυτό παπαγαλίζει μεταξύ άλλων και ένας μεγάλος αριθμός από ηγέτες παγκοσμίως. Ο Kissinger που είναι γνωστός για την “διορατικότητά” του, είπε πως η οικονομική κρίση είναι μια θαυμάσια ευκαιρία για μια νέα παγκόσμια τάξη.
Αυτή την εμμονή των ισχυρών και των φερέφωνών τους να αλλάξουν τον αμαρτωλό καπιταλισμό ή τουλάχιστον να τον ασφαλίσουν από οικονομικές καταστροφές με εγγυητή έναν παγκόσμιο τραπεζιτικό οργανισμό δεν είναι μόνο το αποτέλεσμα της ανησυχίας τους, είναι ο αυτοσκοπός.
Ο οργανισμός αυτός, που θα εμφανίζεται σαν ο μοναδικός τρόπος να περιορίζονται η κερδοσκοπική τους δράση και τα δυσάρεστα αποτελέσματα από την απληστία των διεθνών τραπεζιτών και των αγορών, θα είναι στην πραγματικότητα ακριβώς το αντίθετο, θα συγκεντρώνει και θα ισχυροποιεί την ισχύ των διεθνών τραπεζιτών με μοναδικό στόχο την παγκόσμια κυβέρνηση.
Η κερδοσκοπία, η σπέκουλα και η αρπαγή των πόρων των κρατών θα είναι πια ξεπερασμένο να γίνεται με μεθόδους όπως αυτούς του Δ.Ν.Τ. αφού θα υπάρξουν συμφωνίες που θα παραδίδουν την απόλυτη κυριαρχία των κρατών σε έναν διεθνή οργανισμό, σε μία κεντρική κυβέρνηση. Σε πρώτη φάση, το νέο Δυτικό υπερκράτος θα μπορεί να ανταγωνιστεί με την Κίνα με αποτέλεσμα οι ελίτ της Κίνας και άλλων ισχυρών κρατών να αναγκαστούν να προσχωρήσουν και να συμμορφωθούν σε αυτόν.
Η εξέλιξη αυτή θα συμβεί με τρόπους που δεν είναι δυνατόν να κατανοηθούν σήμερα, αφού οι καταστροφές που θα συμβαίνουν με μαζικό τρόπο θα είναι ισοπεδωτικές.
Καταστροφές και απειλές που θα αναγκάσουν τους ανθρώπους να αναζητήσουν προστασία σε όποιον υπόσχεται να την προσφέρει.
Αυτό το σχέδιο είναι μονόδρομος. Η τάση εκφοβισμού του ανθρώπου με κάθε δυνατό συνδυασμό πείνας, φυσικών καταστροφών, επιδημιών, συγκρούσεων, τρομοκρατίας και πολέμων είναι εμφανής εδώ και πολλά χρόνια, και αναμένεται να ενταθεί στα επόμενα χρόνια.
Μπροστά στο σχεδιασμό για μία παγκόσμια κυβέρνηση με λυτούς και δεμένους να αλλάζουν τα βιβλία Ιστορίας και να μετακινούν πληθυσμούς με ιλιγγιώδεις ρυθμούς η Ελλάδα δεν είναι παρά ένα πεδίο βολής όπου ασκούνται βρίζοντας ξένοι φαντάροι. Είναι όμως ένα πεδίο βολής με συμβολική σημασία. Είναι το πεδίο μεταξύ Δύσης και Ανατολής, Χριστιανισμού και Ισλαμισμού, Πολιτισμού και Πολυπολιτισμού.
Και είναι λογικό να υπολογίζουν πως υπάρχει ακόμα αρκετό αίμα στις φλέβες μας για να ξεκινήσει μια εξέγερση.
Η τακτική της βίαιης αποσταθεροποίησης είναι μία μέθοδος για την προώθηση της αλλαγής του συστήματος που θα υπόσχεται λύσεις και θα σκλαβώνει με το πιο ύπουλο τρόπο.
Χωρίς την οικονομική κρίση που “ξεκίνησε” το 2008 και χωρίς τα δεινά που εγγυάται πως θα φέρει, δεν θα υπήρχε τρόπος να αναγκαστεί και να εκβιαστεί όλος ο Δυτικός κόσμος για να δεχτεί μία νέα πραγματικότητα.
Δεν υπάρχει περίπτωση να είναι μια πρόβα όπως το 1929, επειδή ο καπιταλισμός έχει τελικά πάρει τη πορεία που προβλεπόταν να πάρει και τα πρόσωπα – κλειδιά δίνουν τις λύσεις από τις πρώτες κιόλας μέρες μετά την κρίση του Οκτώβρη του 2008, όπως ακριβώς κάνει και ο πρωθυπουργός που επέβαλαν στην Ελλάδα.
Κάθε βίαιη δράση είναι μάταιη αφού και επανάσταση να γίνει και να πετύχει, σε λίγα χρόνια ή ακόμα και μήνες θα έχει καταληφθεί από αντιπροσώπους του συστήματος που θα φέρουν τα πράγματα στη παλαιά τροχιά ή στη νέα επιθυμητή από το σύστημα τροχιά.
Οδομαχίες με τα ΜΑΤ και τις λοιπές δημοκρατικές δυνάμεις με τις μολότοφ δεν πρόκειται να αλλάξουν το παγκόσμιο σύστημα που έχει εγκαθιδρύσει η ελίτ εδώ και τόσα πολλά χρόνια. Η αλλαγή που απαιτείται για να ανατραπεί αυτή η πορεία είναι δύσκολη και σχεδόν ανέφικτη προς το παρόν, με την νοοτροπία που έχει ενσταλάξει το σύστημα στους πληθυσμούς των κρατών της Δύσης.
Με βάση την μέθοδο Demoralization, Destabilization, Insurgency, Normalization, δηλ. Εξαχρείωση, Αποσταθεροποίηση, Εξέγερση, Επαναφορά (Κανονικοποίηση) αυτή εδώ είναι η φάση της δυσαρέσκειας από την αποσταθεροποίηση η οποία λογικά αναμένεται να γεννήσει την εξέγερση.
Αφού το ζητούμενο για την παγκόσμια ελίτ είναι η εξαθλίωσή μας και τελικά η καταστροφή μας, λίγη σημασία έχει ποιο ποσοστό ανθρώπων θα παραμείνουν ζωντανοί στη Γη μετά την καταστροφή ή τις καταστροφές που αντιμετωπίζουμε μπροστά μας για να συμμορφωθούν στην νέα πραγματικότητα.
Αφού το χρήμα για αυτούς δεν είναι εδώ και για πολύ καιρό ο σκοπός, αλλά το μέσο, αφού ο πραγματικός τους στόχος είναι ο έλεγχος, ο απόλυτος έλεγχος της ζωής μας, δεν είναι τυχαίο που “καταρρέει” ο καπιταλισμός.
Είναι σχεδιασμένος να καταρρεύσει. Είναι λογικό ότι κάθε think tank που έχει ασχοληθεί εκτενώς με τον σχεδιασμό του μέλλοντος έχει καταλήξει σε αυτό το συμπέρασμα σχεδόν αυτόματα. Δεν μπορεί να συντηρήσει ο πλανήτης 6 ή 7 δισεκατομμύρια ανθρώπους οι οποίοι θα απαιτούν όλοι να ζήσουν το αμερικάνικο όνειρο.
Γιατί λοιπόν πουλήθηκε το αμερικάνικο όνειρο σε κάθε γωνιά του πλανήτη σαν ο ιδανικός τρόπος ζωής; Γιατί η εξάπλωση του ίδιου νοσηρού συστήματος εμφανίστηκε σαν ο πρωταρχικός σκοπός της παγκόσμιας ελίτ; Για να πλουτίσουν περισσότερο οι σχεδιαστές του μέλλοντος ή μήπως για να μπορέσει να τον διαδεχθεί ο σοσιαλισμός; Η τάση είναι ξεκάθαρη. Η τάση με το “παγκόσμιο χωριό” που κινδυνεύει από το διοξείδιο του άνθρακα που εκπέμπει ακόμα και το κάθε μικρό χωριό στη τελευταία γωνία του πλανήτη είναι ολοφάνερα μια τάση απόλυτου ελέγχου ακόμα και του τελευταίου αυτού μικρού χωριού.
Η συνειδητοποίηση που προωθείται είναι πως η “καλή ζωή” που μας πρόσφερε ο καπιταλισμός είναι ένα “μεγάλο λάθος” επειδή δεν μπορούν τάχα όλοι οι κάτοικοι της πλανήτη να απολαμβάνουν το ίδιο επίπεδο διαβίωσης όπως αυτό της Ευρώπης και της Αμερικής. Όχι για κανένα άλλο λόγο, αλλά επειδή θα “επιβαρύνει” το περιβάλλον.
Η καλή ζωή είναι “σπάταλη” και καταστρέφει τον πλανήτη. Αυτή είναι η εκδοχή που θέλουν να περάσουν. Δεν φταίει η αφάνταστη απληστία των ισχυρών και των μεγιστάνων της Γης, φταίει η ανάγκη του κάθε ανθρώπου να έχει από ένα ψυγείο, ένα πλυντήριο, μια τηλεόραση, άντε ίσως και ένα αυτοκίνητο. Αυτό ξεκάθαρα μας ανακοινώνουν πως δεν είναι πια εφικτό.
Γι’ αυτό “αφεθήκαμε” στην σπατάλη και στον υπερκαταναλωτισμό, για να μπορέσουμε να το εμπεδώσουμε καλύτερα.
Ο “σοσιαλισμός” που θα εγκαθιδρυθεί θα είναι μια τυραννία χωρίς προηγούμενο.
Η νέα θρησκεία είναι το περιβάλλον, άρα και η νέα αμαρτία είναι η “σπατάλη” και η “επιβάρυνση” του περιβάλλοντος.
Ο άνθρωπος δεν θα είναι πια ελεύθερος να κάνει ό,τι θέλει, αλλά θα πρέπει να συμμορφωθεί σε πολύ αυστηρούς κανόνες “για να σωθεί ο πλανήτης”. Υπάρχουν βέβαια εξαιρέσεις, δηλαδή όλοι οι ισχυροί του πλανήτη και οι υπάλληλοί τους, αλλά ο απλός άνθρωπος θα πρέπει να συμμορφώνεται πλήρως και να ελέγχεται για τις δραστηριότητές του.
Ο άνθρωπος που θα επιθυμεί να ζει με τα σημερινά δεδομένα θα είναι αμαρτωλός.
Για να υπάρξει ο απόλυτος έλεγχος της “σπατάλης” των ενεργειακών πόρων και της μόλυνσης που προκαλεί ο κάθε αμαρτωλός άνθρωπος που θα επιμένει να θέλει να ζήσει μια αξιοπρεπή ζωή, θα πρέπει να σημαδευτεί όπως τα ζώα και να περνάει κάθε δραστηριότητά του στους κεντρικούς υπολογιστές.
Αν αντιληφθούμε πως το σύστημα ποτέ δεν αυτοκτονεί αλλά απλά ξαναεφεύρει τον εαυτό του, τότε είναι εμφανές ότι δεν φοβάται την εξέγερση, αλλά αντίθετα την προβοκάρει. Είναι ο μοναδικός τρόπος να επιβληθεί ένα τόσο μεγαλόπνοο σχέδιο.
Το σύστημα που ρίχνει τους πύργους με εκατοντάδες αθώους μέσα, δεν έχει τέτοιους φόβους, ούτε ενδοιασμούς. Αντίθετα αντιλαμβάνεται την αποτελεσματικότητα της καταστροφής σαν το τέλειο μέσο πειθούς.
Αν αυτή η εξέγερση εξαπλωθεί σε άλλα ευρωπαϊκά κράτη ή ακόμα και στην Αμερική, δεν θα πρόκειται για μια απειλή για το σύστημα. Τα θύματα για αυτούς είναι αναλώσιμα ανθρώπινα όντα. Ακόμα και τα μεγάλα στελέχη του συστήματος είναι αναλώσιμα. Μετά από τα ειδικά δικαστήρια και τις άλλες παραστάσεις, θα “καταδικαστούν” και θα αποσυρθούν οι ακατάλληλοι κυβερνήτες, ίσως και να τιμωρηθούν με αναγκαστική εργασία σε διάφορες πολυεθνικές για να συνεχίσουν την καριέρα τους, και στη θέση τους θα αναλάβουν την εξουσία οι νέοι σωτήρες.
Ακόμα και στην περίπτωση που δεν θα υπάρξει εξέγερση, το σύστημα θα πονέσει για την ταλαιπωρία μας και θα θελήσει από μόνο του να δώσει τη λύση. Είναι γνωστό πως θέλουν το καλό μας και δεν μπορούν να μας βλέπουν να βασανιζόμαστε.
Η λύση λοιπόν θα είναι η “σοσιαλιστική” και φανατικά περιβαλλοντική παγκόσμια κυβέρνηση η οποία θα επιβάλλει τον απανθρωπισμό σαν την ορθή και αναγκαία μέθοδο και η παγκόσμια τράπεζα θα είναι η βάση αυτής της παγκόσμιας κυβέρνησης.
Αυτή είναι η ένδεια και ο μοναδικός πλούτος μας είναι η ανθρώπινη ιδιότητά μας και η ικανότητά μας να αποτρέψουμε αυτό το εφιαλτικό μέλλον με τρόπους εξυπνότερους και αποτελεσματικότερους από τα διάφορα διεθνή think tanks.

Za-mam-phood

Είσαι ξύπνιο και πνευματώδες παιδί και θέλεις να είσαι ο trendy blogger της ελληνικής σκηνής;
Θέλεις να κατοχυρώσεις πως είσαι πολυδιαβασμένος (γκούχ) και πως έχεις διαβάσει τα βιβλία του Douglas Adams;
Δεν έχεις τι να κάνεις με τη ζωή σου και όλη τη μέρα διαβάζεις ξεσηκώνεις και “σκαρφίζεσαι” χαριτωμένα κειμενάκια – καρμπόν για να σε φιλοφρονήσουνε τα φιλαράκια σου;

Δεν έχεις την παραμικρή ανησυχία ούτε χολοσκάς μιας και δεν πρόκειται κανένας λαθρομετανάστης να σου πάρει την πανεπιστημιακή ή άλλη απλησίαστη για τους περισσότερους έλληνες “μαλάκες” της εργατικής τάξης σίγουρη και στρωμένη δουλειά σου;
Ή ακόμα καλύτερα, είσαι εισοδηματίας ή ο μπαμπάς απασχολεί λαθρομετανάστες επειδή οι Έλληνες του πέφτουν ακριβοί;
Ε τότε, αφού η ίδια η ζωή σε έχει οδηγήσει σε ένα τόσο μεγάλο αδιέξοδο, δεν σου αφήνει καμία άλλη επιλογή και αναγκαστικά πλέον δεν μπορείς να κάνεις τίποτε άλλο απ’ το να γράψεις μεταξύ άλλων:

«Εσύ μαλάκα που έχεις όνομα και επίθετο. Εσύ, που όταν οι εργοδότες σου αποφάσισαν ότι τα 800 ευρώ που παίρνεις τους πέφτουν πολλά και σε πέταξαν στο δρόμο, πίστεψες ότι για όλα φταίνε οι Πακιστανοί και οι Αλβανοί που σου τρώνε το ψωμί. Εσύ μαλάκα υπάνθρωπε. Ξύπνα!»

Όχι δεν φταίνε για όλα. Μάλιστα, δεν φταίνε για τίποτα. Απλά βρήκαν ανοιχτά και μπήκαν και διεκδικούν αυτό που δικαιωματικά τους ανήκει.
Το ψωμί.
Ούτως ή άλλως όμως, το ψωμί που τρώνε δεν το φέραν μαζί τους ούτε από το Πακιστάν ούτε από την Αλβανία.
Άρα μάλλον για ελληνικό ψωμί πρόκειται.
Αφού λοιπόν έχει τόσο πολύ ψωμί η Ελλάδα, γιατί θυμώνεις και μας αποκαλείς μαλάκες;
Πείνασε κανένας;
Γιατί μας ζητάς να ξυπνήσουμε;
Τι έγινε δηλαδή;
Μειώθηκε μήπως ποτέ καμία σύνταξη ή κανένας μισθός εξαιτίας της αλλοδαπής υπερπροσφοράς της μαύρης εργασίας;
Όχι ντε.
Και μήπως τάχα όταν θα ξυπνήσουμε, θα βρούμε τρόπο να απαγορεύσουμε στους 350 λαθρομετανάστες που διέσχισαν τα σύνορα χθες να δουλέψουν στην μαύρη εργασία;
Μα αυτό είναι elementary… έτσι δεν είναι;
Αφού λοιπόν έχει ψωμί για όλους μας, αν εμείς οι “υπάνθρωποι” γίνουμε “ανεκτικοί” και “ελαστικοί” σαν τους λαθρομετανάστες θα βρούμε και εμείς ψωμί.
Αυτό είναι το ζητούμενο τελικά, και όχι να σταματήσουν (προς Θεού) οι άνθρωποι να έρχονται.
Και αν τελικά το μόνο “αριστερό” πρόβλημα με όλη αυτή την κατάσταση είναι που το ψωμί είναι άνισα διανεμημένο, δηλαδή μεταξύ των πλουσίων και των λαθρομεταναστοποιημένων ανέργων “υπανθρώπων” Ελλήνων, το ελπιδοφόρο και πρωτοποριακό κίνημα της συνδικαλισμένης λαθρομετανάστευσης θα το λύσει και αυτό εν καιρώ.
Προς τι λοιπόν η ανησυχία;
Ζωή σε μας…

Εδώ είναι και το υπόλοιπο πρωτότυπο και αυθεντικότατο αριστούργημα – εγερτήριο (εκ του ασφαλούς) για να ξυπνάμε σιγά σιγά… frapezitis.wordpress.com

Ανατριχιαστικό βίντεο αλητοδημοσιογραφίας

Ανεξάρτητα απ’ το αν κάποιος συμφωνεί ή όχι με την αποτελεσματικότητα του πετάγματος ενός παπουτσιού προς την κατεύθυνση του Παπανδρέου, η αντίδραση των δημοσιογράφων του πάνελ του Mega θυμίζει εκείνη μιας αγέλης από ύαινες που απειλούνται να χάσουν το μερίδιό τους από τα απομεινάρια μιας φρεσκοσκοτωμένης λείας. Και μάλλον οι ύαινες έχουν κάποια ελαφρυντικά που εκείνοι σαφέστατα δεν έχουν.

Έχει κι συνέχεια…

«Τις συνέπειες της ανοησίας του θα τις μάθουμε τις επόμενες μέρες, τα συμπεράσματα όμως μπορούμε από τώρα να τα βγάλουμε. Η τηλεόραση σε όλα τα πλάτη και μήκη της γης συνεχίζει να κάνει είδηση την γελοιότητα. Πολλές φορές την κατασκευάζει κιόλας αναμασώντας ηρωικές πράξεις του παρελθόντος. Γιατί μην μου πείτε ότι φανταζόταν ποτέ ο Αλ Ζάιντι – ο Ιρακινός δημοσιογράφος που πέταξε το παπούτσι του στο Μπους – ότι κάποτε θα τον αντέγραφε ένας «πατριώτης» που βλέπει οράματα ότι του παίρνουν την Μακεδονία και ότι δεν του διορίζουν την κόρη (εναλλάξ).»

Η γελοιότητα ξεχειλίζει από την ανοιχτή τηλεόραση και διαχέεται ακόμα και στα “προοδευτικά” μπαράκια και πότε πότε κρατάνε και καμιά σημείωση στην χαρτοπετσέτα άμα λάχει…
Μην πάει χαμένη η έμπνευση. Εναλλάξ οράματα είναι αυτά…
Το παραπάνω απόσπασμα, αριστούργημα γεμάτο απέχθεια προς τον πατριώτη, είναι του πρωτ-αγωνιστή Σταύρου Θεοδωράκη του Protagon, που ανησυχεί για «τις συνέπειες της ανοησίας» του γιατρού.

Όταν καις ολόκληρη πόλη και κάνεις πλιάτσικο επειδή σου παίρνουν την ζωή σου από τα χέρια σου δεν είναι «ανοησία», δεν είναι «γελοίο», είναι υγιής επαναστατικότητα, αλλά όταν πετάς ένα παπούτσι είναι «γελοίο» και «ανοησία», ακόμα κι αν σου παίρνουν τη ζωή σου μέσα από τα χέρια σου με ένα αργό αλλά εξίσου αποτελεσματικό τρόπο.

Αυτό που φαίνεται να έχει σημασία τελικά στον αριστερόστροφο φαντασιακό κόσμο είναι το στυλ της έκφρασης. Αλλιώς είναι η μολότοφ πως να το κάνουμε… Εξάλλου δικαίωμα στον “ακτιβισμό” δεν μπορεί να έχει όποιος κι όποιος. Που πας κύριε με πατριωτική ορμή; Γιατί δεν ρωτάς να μάθεις; Ο “ακτιβισμός” ανήκει αποκλειστικά σε συγκεκριμένα άτομα του χώρου. Αν δεν έχεις τα απαραίτητα “διαπιστευτήρια” να κάτσεις σπίτι σου.
Ξέχνα τους οπλαρχηγούς.
Αυτή την «ανοησία» τους ν’ απελευθερωθούμε από τους “πολίτες του κόσμου” ακόμα την πληρώνουμε.
Και τώρα, για να ξανακουστούν τα τούρκικα και οι μιναρέδες σε όλη τη χώρα, πρέπει να μας ξεπουλάνε πυρετωδώς οι πολιτικοί, να ιδρώνουν οι dragones, να ξεφορτώνουν μέρα νύχτα οι βάρκες στο Αιγαίο, και στα κανάλια, να “αγωνίζονται” τα protagon για τους αδυνάτους και τις “φυλές της Αθήνας” και να παίζουν οι οθωμανικές σαπουνόπερες απ’ το πρωί μέχρι το βράδυ χωρίς σταματημό.

Τι κρίμα που μετά από τόση στήριξη από το σύστημα της κατ’ εξοχήν αριστερόστροφης καθεστωτικής δημοσιογραφίας η μολότοφ έχει εκτελέσει την αποστολή της και αποσύρθηκε μέχρι νεωτέρας.
Έτσι μετριέται το cool της επαναστατικότητας. Η φωτιά δεν έχει συνέπειες. Το παπούτσι όμως έχει. Άντε να δούμε τώρα τι θα μας κάνουν… Τι συνέπειες θα έχουμε. Λέτε να ανέβουν τα spreads; Λέτε να κλείσει το Mega;